judyrecords
search tips
760 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

JAMES F. MCMILLAN V. UNITED STATES

Case Information: 93-CF-1338
Short Caption:JAMES F. MCMILLAN V. UNITED STATESClassification:Appeals - Criminal Felony - Homicide
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:F10635-92Filed Date:10/12/1993

Opening Event Date:10/12/1993Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:08/24/1994Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:11/28/1994
Argued/Submitted:03/20/1995
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:04/13/1995
Costs Waived

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantJames F. Mcmillan Y
Judith SandalowNN
Michael H. Stone YN
AppelleeUnited StatesN
Leslie A. Blackmon YN
John R. Fisher NN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
10/12/1993NOTICE OF APPEAL
11/03/1993APPOINTING COUNSEL/CO REFERRAL (CJA) John A. Briley, Jr., Esq.
11/17/1993APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT
11/17/1993RECORD ON APPEAL
11/17/1993SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (26 pages--Ronan) (10/01/93 proceedings)
12/02/1993SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #2 ( Reporter's Transcript -Proc.6/28/93-thru-7/2/93-528 Pages-Reporter- Tremel).
03/07/1994SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD#3 (31-pgs/griffin 6/18/93 proc.)
04/06/1994COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW FOR BUSINESS REASONS Granted
04/13/1994SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #4 (663 pages--Moore(Curley)) (6/21,22,23,24/93 proc.)
04/29/1994ORDER: Grant the motion of counsel for appellant to withdraw and the appointment of John A. Briley, Jr._, Esquire, is vacated, and Michael H. Stone____, Esquire, is appointed to represent appellant herein. John A. Briley______, Esquire, shall transmit all documents to this appeal to newly-appointed counsel forthwith. F/O that newly-appointed counsel for appellant shall advise this court, within 20 days from the date of this order, as to the status of the aforementioned transcript. Failure tlo comply may result in the issuance of a briefing order. (By: JMF)
04/29/1994APPOINTING COUNSEL/CO REFERRAL (CJA) Michael H. Stone, Esq.
05/27/1994STATEMENT from appellant's counsel in compliance with the order of this court docketed 4/29/94, hereby states that counsel has been unable to contact John A. Briley, Jr., and has not received any documents or transcripts from Mr. Briley.
08/08/1994STATEMENT - status report filed by appellant's counsel, stating all transcripts has been received by appellant.
08/24/1994SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #5 (Reproter's Transcript- Proc. 7/1/93-17 Pages-Reporter-Hilton-Proc. 7/6/91-13 pages-Reporter-Hilton).
08/24/1994RECORD COMPLETED
08/29/1994ORDER: The brief of appellant shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order and the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. Any requests for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. See D.C. App. R. 31. (By: WHN)
10/07/1994APPELLANT'S BRIEF
11/01/1994APPELLEE'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF until November 28, 1994 (no oppo)
11/09/1994ORDER: Grant the motion of appellant for an extension of time within which to file the brief and the brief of appellant shall be filed on or before November 28, 1994. Any further request for an exte nsion of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (By WHN)
11/28/1994APPELLEE'S BRIEF
11/28/1994BRIEFS COMPLETED
11/28/1994SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #6 (Reporter's Transcript- Proc. 7/2/93-10 Pages-Reporter-Tremel).
12/19/1994FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I
03/20/1995FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
03/20/1995SUBMITTED (FE,KG,RE)
03/22/1995AFFIRMED IN PART/REMANDED IN PART MOJ (FE,KG,RE)
04/13/1995MANDATE ISSUED
05/04/1995LETTER referring to counsel a letter from aplt dated April 19, 1995, regarding case. (JAC)
09/28/1995RECEIVED letter from appellant, in regards to his attorney.
10/06/1995APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION - to recall mandate
10/12/1995ORDER On consideration of appellant's letter of September 25, 1995, construed as a motion for appointment of counsel to file a motion to recall mandate, it is Ordered that the motion is denied. (FE,KG,NW)
08/02/1996APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN OPPOSITION to file oppo to mot. to recall
08/02/1996RECEIVED - aple's opp to mot. to recall mandate
08/06/1996TMC - Appellant motion to recall the mandate - Motion for leave to late-file appellee's oppo. to motion to recall mandate - Aple's oppo. to motion to recall mandate
03/07/1997ORD GRANT APLE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE OPPOSITION to the motion to recall mandate, and the Clerk shall file the lodged opposition. (by: RDKGPY)
03/07/1997APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION to aplt's motion to recall the mandate.
03/07/1997ORDERED that appellant's (pro se) motion to recall the mandate is held in abeyance pending further order of the court. (by: FEKGPY)
03/07/1997ORDER GRANTING APLT'S REQUEST TO APPOINT COUNSEL and Judith Sandalow, Esquire is appointed to represent appellant in order to assess the issues presented in appellant's motion to recall mandate and file the appropriate pleading within 60 days from the date of this order. (by: FEKGPY)
03/07/1997APPOINTING COUNSEL/COURT ORDER REFERRAL (CJA) Judith Sandalow, Esq.
04/21/1997APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for extension of time to supplement aplt's aplt's pro-se motion to recall mandate
04/24/1997TMC - Aplt's unopposed motion for extension of time to suppplement pro se motion to recall mandate.
05/21/1997ORDER GRANT APLT MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION and the supplement appellant's pro se motion to recall the mandate shall be filed no later than July 7, 1997. (BY: {FE, KG, PR)
06/25/1997NOTICE RECEIVED by appellant's counsel, of intent not to supplement appellant's pro se motion to recall the mandate
06/27/1997TMC - Aplt's notice of intent not to supp. pro se motion to recall mandate
07/11/1997ORDER DENY APLT MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION to recall the mandate. (by: FEKGPY)
08/29/2000ORDER On consideration of appellant's letter dated August 7, 2000, construed as a second motion to recall the mandate, and it appearing that appellant's previous motion to recall the mandate filed Oct. 6, 1995, wherein counsel was appointed to assess the issues presented in appellant's motion, was denied by order of this court dated July 11, 1997, it is Ordered that appellant's second motion to recall the mandate is denied. (WA)
08/29/2013FiledLetter From Appellant asking for counsel to be appointed (Appellant)
09/12/2013FiledLetter To Judith Sandalow, Esq. re: appellant's letter