Parties and Attorneys
In re STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA on Habeas Corpus
Division 5
Division 5
Case Number A155804
| Party | Attorney |
|---|---|
| Steven Wayne Bonilla : Petitioner San Quentin State Prison San Quentin, CA 94974 | Pro Per |
| The People : Respondent | Office of the Attorney General 455 Golden Gate Avenue - Suite 11000 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 |
Case Summary
Trial Court Case:
H12210A
Court of Appeal Case:
A155804
Division:
5
Case Caption:
In re STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA on Habeas Corpus
Case Type:
CR
Filing Date:
11/19/2018
Completion Date:
11/26/2018
Oral Argument Date/Time:
Docket (Register of Actions)
In re STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA on Habeas Corpus
Division 5
Division 5
Case Number A155804
| Date | Description | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 11/19/2018 | Petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed. | by Petitioner in pro per |
| 11/26/2018 | Order denying petition filed. | BY THE COURT:* Assuming, arguendo, that the instant filing is properly entertained and should not be stricken notwithstanding petitioner's representation by counsel (In re Barnett (2003) 31 Cal.4th 466, 477-478), the petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. * Before Jones, P.J., Simons, J., and Needham, J. |
| 11/26/2018 | Case complete. |
Briefs
In re STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA on Habeas Corpus
Division 5
Division 5
Case Number A155804
No information found.
Future Scheduled Actions
In re STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA on Habeas Corpus
Division 5
Division 5
Case Number A155804
No information found.
Disposition
In re STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA on Habeas Corpus
Division 5
Division 5
Case Number A155804
Description:
Petition summarily denied by order
Date:
11/26/2018
Disposition Type:
Final
BY THE COURT:* Assuming, arguendo, that the instant filing is properly entertained and should not be stricken notwithstanding petitioner's representation by counsel (In re Barnett (2003) 31 Cal.4th 466, 477-478), the petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. * Before Jones, P.J., Simons, J., and Needham, J.
BY THE COURT:* Assuming, arguendo, that the instant filing is properly entertained and should not be stricken notwithstanding petitioner's representation by counsel (In re Barnett (2003) 31 Cal.4th 466, 477-478), the petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. * Before Jones, P.J., Simons, J., and Needham, J.
Publication Status:
Author:
Participants:
Case Citation:
none
Trial Court
In re STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA on Habeas Corpus
Division 5
Division 5
Case Number A155804
Trial Court Name:
Alameda County Superior Court - Main
County:
Alameda
Trial Court Case Number:
H12210A
Trial Court Judge:
Travis, Benjamin
Trial Court Judgment Date: