| Case Information: 33372 | |||
| Short Caption: | PANOS CANADIAN INVESTMENTS VS. AUSTIN | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Lower Court Case(s): | Washoe Co. - Second Judicial District - CV9702851 | Classification: | Civil Appeal - General - Other |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Disposition Filed/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | 11/25/1998 / Berry, Robert | SP Status: | Completed |
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | How Submitted: | ||
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 11/19/1998 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Debra Robinson Naquin--check no. 1369. | ||
| 11/19/1998 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) | 98-00123 | |
| 11/25/1998 | Settlement Notice | Issued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Robert G. Berry. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts suspended pending further order of this court.) | ||
| 12/08/1998 | Docketing Statement | Filed Docketing Statement. | 98-00293 | |
| 12/17/1998 | Motion | Filed Motion for Stay. Emergency Motion for Stay Pending Appeal. | 98-00405 | |
| 12/18/1998 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. Temporarily stay enforcement of the district court orders of October 20, 1998, and November 17, 1998, until further order of this court. Respondent's response due 1/4/99. District court order due in this court 5 days after the date it was entered in the district court. | 98-00444 | |
| 01/04/1999 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Notice. Submission of Trial Court's Order. | 99-00023 | |
| 01/07/1999 | Motion | Filed Motion. Request for Submission of Emergency Motion for Stay Pending Appeal for Decision. | 99-00080 | |
| 03/10/1999 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Granting Motion. On Decemer 18, 1998, we temporarily stayed enforcement of the district court's orders of October 20, 1998, and November 17, 1998, until we received and considered respondents' opposition for a stay. Respondents have not filed an opposition to date, and we therefore grant appellants' motion for a stay. The challenged district court orders shall not be enforced during the pendency of this appeal or until further order of this court. | 99-01663 | |
| 04/14/1999 | Motion | Filed Motion. Petition for Order of Limited Remand. | 99-02880 | |
| 04/20/1999 | Motion | Filed Response to Motion. Opposition to Petition for Order of Limited Remand. | 99-03077 | |
| 05/11/1999 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. We remand this matter to the district court for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to modify and clarify its order with respect to the 1996 payment under the Placer Dome contract, and the distribution thereof, consistent with its findings of fact, conclusions of law, and judgment. The district court shallenter its order within 30 days of the date of this order, and shall immediately transmit a certified copy of the order to this court. fn1[This order of limited remand does not affect the viability of this appeal or the continuing jurisdiction of this court]. | 99-03814 | |
| 06/11/1999 | Settlement Program Report | Filed Interim Settlement Program Report. The parties have agreed to a settlement of this matter. | 99-04980 | |
| 06/11/1999 | Settlement Program Motion/Stipulation | Filed Settlement Program/Stipulated Dismissal. | 99-04981 | |
| 06/18/1999 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Stipulated Dismissal. Pursuant to the settlement conference held in this matter and the stipulation of the parties, " . . . this appeal is dismissed." The parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys' fees. NRAP 42(b). NNP/CLK | 99-05278 | |
| 06/18/1999 | Case Status Update | Case Closed. No remittitur issued. | ||