| Events |
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result |
| 08/02/1993 | | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |
| 08/24/1993 | | APPOINTING COUNSEL/CO REFERRAL (CJA) Judith A. Lovelace, Esq. | |
| 08/30/1993 | | APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT | |
| 09/08/1993 | | RECORD ON APPEAL | |
| 10/04/1993 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (160 pgs. - Herzfeld) (6/2/93 proc.) | |
| 10/07/1993 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #7 (202 pages--Hunt) (6/1/93 proceedings) | |
| 10/07/1993 | | RECORD COMPLETED | |
| 11/22/1993 | | ORDER that the brief of appellant shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. Any request for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (by: WHN) | |
| 01/03/1994 | | APPELLANT'S BRIEF | |
| 02/04/1994 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD#8 (23-pgs/ronan 7/21/93 proc.) | |
| 02/07/1994 | | APPELLEE'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF until 3/9/94. | |
| 03/04/1994 | | ORD GRANT APLE MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF on or before March 9, 1994. Any further request for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (by: WHN) | |
| 03/09/1994 | | APPELLEE'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF-to MARCH 23, 1994 | |
| 03/14/1994 | | APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION to Government's second motion for extension of time. | |
| 03/22/1994 | | ORD GRANT APLE MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF on or before March 23, 1994. Any further request for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (by: WHN) | |
| 03/23/1994 | | APPELLEE'S BRIEF | |
| 03/23/1994 | | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |
| 04/11/1994 | | FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I | |
| 07/18/1994 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION REQUESTING ORAL ARGUMENT | |
| 07/29/1994 | | ORDER GRANT APLT MOTION REQUESTING ORAL ARGUMENT AND THERE BEING NO OPPOSITION THERETO WHN | |
| 08/25/1994 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY BRIEF | |
| 08/25/1994 | | RECEIVED -- Reply Brief of appellant. | |
| 09/08/1994 | | ORDER GRANT APLT MOTION FOR LV TO FILE REPLY BRIEFthere appearing to be no opposition thereto, and the lodged reply brief is grant and the lodged reply brief is filed. WHN | |
| 09/08/1994 | | APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF is filed | |
| 09/09/1994 | | CERTIFICATE PER RULE 28 | |
| 09/20/1994 | | ARGUED (FE,TE,NW) Judith A. Lovelace, Esquire, for appellant. Mark J. Carroll, Esquire, for appellee. | |
| 10/04/1994 | | CERTIFICATE PER RULE 28 | |
| 10/20/1994 | | AFFIRMED opinion | |
| 11/02/1994 | | APLT'S PETITION FOR REHEARING/REHEARING EN BANC | |
| 11/28/1994 | | ORDER that appellee within 20 days from the date of this order shall file a response to petition for rehearing en banc (10 copies). (WA) | |
| 04/28/1995 | | APPELLEE'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN OPPOSITION | |
| 04/28/1995 | | RECEIVED -aple's opposition to aplt's petition for rehearing en banc | |
| 05/04/1995 | | NOTICE RECEIVED of consent of the parties for the public defender service to participate as amicus curiae and suggestion that this court, sua sponte, grant rehearing with an opportunity for additional briefing. | |
| 06/14/1995 | | AMICUS CURIAE MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for leave to file supp exhibit to suggestion of Amicus Curiae | |
| 08/02/1995 | | RECEIVED - motion of aplt to consolidate case with 93 cf 979 filed in 95 co 928 | |
| 08/30/1995 | | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for leave to file supplement to petition for rehearing en banc. | |
| 08/30/1995 | | RECEIVED supplement to petition for rehearing en banc. | |
| 06/10/1996 | | ORDER sua sponte that this case shall be reheard before this division of the court. Such rehearing shall be limited to the following issues: 1) What is the effect on this case, if any, of the discrepancy between the enrolled original and the codified version of D.C. Code Sec. 33-541 (g)? 2) If the effect of this statutory discrepancy is prejudicial to appellant, what relief, if any, is available to remedy such prejudice? It is Further Ordered that within 21 days from the date of this order, the parties shall file simultaneous suppl. briefs addressing these issues. It is Further Ordered that the Public Defender Service, as amicus curiae, may file a brief within 21 days from the date of this order addressing the same issues. It is Further Ordered that the Clerk shall schedule this case for reargument before this division as soon after the filing of the suppl. briefs as the calendar permits. The Public Defender Service is invited to participate in that argument. (FE,TE,BE) | |
| 06/28/1996 | | APLT MOTION TO EXT TIME TO FILE SUPLEMENTAL BRIEF to 7/3/96 no oppo | |
| 07/03/1996 | | RECEIVED - aplt's supplemental brief | |
| 07/03/1996 | | RECEIVED supplemental brief of the Public Defender Service for the District of Columbia as Amicus Curiae | |
| 07/03/1996 | | RECEIVED supplemental brief for Appellee | |
| 07/10/1996 | | ORDER On consideration of the unopposed joint motion to extend time for filing supplemental briefs to July 3, 1996, and the lodged supplemental briefs of appellant, appellee, and the Public Defender Service for the District of Columbia as amicus curiae, it is Ordered that the motion is granted and the Clerk is directed to file the lodged supplemental briefs. (FE,TE,BE) | |
| 07/10/1996 | | APPELLANT'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF/MEMORANDUM | |
| 07/10/1996 | | APPELLEE'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF/MEMORANDUM | |
| 07/10/1996 | | AMICUS CURIAE'S BRIEF (supplemental brief of the Public Defender Service for the District of Columbia) | |
| 09/11/1996 | | ORDER It appearing that this matter has been scheduled for argument and that the calendar improperly identifies this Summary I Calendar case as being on the Regular Calendar of October 24, 1996, it is Ordered that this matter is scheduled for argument as a Summary Calendar case, with argument on October 24, 1996 limited to 15 minutes per side. (FE,TE,BE) | |
| 10/24/1996 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | |
| 10/24/1996 | | ARGUED (FE,TE,BE) Jaclyn Frankfurt, Esquire, for appellant. Judith A. Lovelace., Esquire, for appellant. Roy W. McLEESE, Esquire, for appellee. | |
| 08/28/1997 | | error | |
| 11/06/1997 | | ORDER DENYING APLT PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC also grant the motion of appellee for leave to file opposition to petition and the motion of appellant for leave to file supplement to petition and the Clerk is directed to file the lodged opposition and supplement. (Judges Schwelb and Reid would grant rehearing en banc.) (EB) | |
| 11/06/1997 | | APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION to petition for rehearing en banc | |
| 11/06/1997 | | STATEMENT (appellant's supplement to petition for rehearing en banc) | |
| 11/14/1997 | | MANDATE ISSUED | |