judyrecords
search tips
760 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

LONNIE L. WIGGINS, III V. UNITED STATES

Case Information: 94-CO-0480
Short Caption:LONNIE L. WIGGINS, III V. UNITED STATESClassification:Appeals - Criminal Other - Other Criminal
Lead: 94-CO-0479 Consolidated:94-CO-0480
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:M3918-93Filed Date:04/26/1994

Opening Event Date:04/26/1994Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:
Argued/Submitted:
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:06/20/1994

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantLonnie L. Wiggins, IIIN
Theodore R. Weckel, Jr.NN
AppelleeUnited StatesN
John R. Fisher NN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
04/26/1994NOTICE OF APPEAL
04/26/1994APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT
04/28/1994APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION for immediate bond hearing and memorandum of points and authorities.
04/28/1994APPOINTING COUNSEL/CO REFERRAL (CJA) Theodore R. Weckel, Jr., Esq.
05/03/1994TMC - Appellant's motion for immediate bond hearing and memorandum of points and authorities
05/04/1994APPELLEE'S ANSWER/RESPONSE to motion for immediate bond hearing.
05/04/1994APPELLEE'S ANSWER/RESPONSE to motion for immediate bond hearing.
05/06/1994ORDER that appeal nos. 94-CO-479 and 94-CO-480 are hereby consolidated. F/O that appellant shall, within 10 days from the date of this order, show cause why these appeals should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. F/O that the appellant's motion for immediate bond hearing is held in abeyance pending his response to this court's order to show cause. (by: TEWANG)
05/10/1994APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION - to show cause why appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction and request for leave to provide additional facts and memorandum of point and authorities
05/26/1994ORDER that this appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jursidiction for lack of a non-final order, without prejudice to appellant appealing from the order issued by the trial court denying the motion t reconsider. F/O that all other pending motions are denied as moot. (by: TEWGNM)
05/26/1994DISMISSED
06/20/1994MANDATE ISSUED
06/23/1994RECEIVED Record on Appeal for 94-CO-479