| Events |
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result |
| 06/17/1993 | | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |
| 07/20/1993 | | APPOINTING COUNSEL/CO REFERRAL (CJA) Patrick T. Hand, Esquire | |
| 07/27/1993 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (4 pgs. -- Boston) (1/27/93 proceedings) | |
| 07/28/1993 | | RECORD ON APPEAL | |
| 07/30/1993 | | APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT | |
| 10/06/1993 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #2 (311 pages--Watkins) (2/25,26/93 proceedings) | |
| 11/29/1993 | | ORDER that the brief of appellant shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. Any request for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (by: WHN) | |
| 11/29/1993 | | COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW FOR BUSINESS REASONS (no oppo.) | Granted |
| 11/29/1993 | | MOTION(S) FEE PAID for mwbiz. | |
| 12/27/1993 | | ORDER: Grant the motion of counsel for appellant to withdraw and the appointment of Patrick T. Hand_____, Esquire, is vacated, and Paul H. Zukerberg___, Esquire, is appointed to represent appellant herein. Patrick T. Hand_____, Esquire, shall transmit all documents to this appeal to newly-appointed counsel forthwith. F/O that the brief of appellant shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order. (By JWR) | |
| 12/27/1993 | | APPOINTING COUNSEL/CO REFERRAL (CJA) Paul H. Zukerberg, Esq. | |
| 02/07/1994 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR STAY appeal pending the resolution of appellant's 23-110 motion. | |
| 03/04/1994 | | ORDER GRANTING APPELLANT MOTION FOR STAY, and this appeal is hereby stayed pending further order of this court. If the motion in the trial court is denied, review of that denial may be sought only by filing a separate notice of appeal, after which the two appeals will be consolidated. See Hall v. U.S., 559 A.2d 1321, 1322 (D.C. 1989). F/O that counsel for appellant shall advise this court within 30 days from the date of this order, as to the status of the proceedings in the trial court. (By: JWR) | |
| 03/11/1994 | | CHANGE OF ADDRESS RECEIVED by: Paul H. Zukerberg 1790 Lanier Place, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20009-2116 | |
| 03/25/1994 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #2 (62 pages--Swaim) (9/4/92 proc.) (6 pages--Sides) (4/15/93 proc.) Total pages--68 | |
| 04/08/1994 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #3 (29 pages--Taped) (6/17/93 proc.) | |
| 04/11/1994 | | ORDER counsel for appellant in 15 days to file a response as to the status of the pending trial court motion. This response shall be accompanied with a motion for leave. Failre to comply with this order may result in counsel's appointment beign vacated. (By WHN) | |
| 04/18/1994 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LV TO FILE ANSWER/RESPONSE | |
| 04/18/1994 | | RECEIVED- status report | |
| 04/18/1994 | | error | |
| 04/29/1994 | | ORD GRT APLT MOTION FOR LV TO FILE ANSWER/RESPONSE, and then lodged status report is filed. (By: WHN) | |
| 04/29/1994 | | STATEMENT - status report re: 23-110 motion | |
| 05/18/1994 | | SECOND 23-110 status report. | |
| 06/15/1994 | | RECORD COMPLETED | |
| 06/15/1994 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #4 (142 pgs -- Watking-Griffin) (2/24/93 proc.) | |
| 07/05/1994 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall advise this court within 30 days from the date of this order as to the status of the 23-110 motion pending in the trial court. (By WHN) (VVD) | |
| 07/07/1994 | | APPELLANT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE | |
| 08/09/1994 | | APPELLANT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE, regarding the 23-110 motion. | |
| 08/31/1994 | | STATEMENT - fourth 23-110 status report. | |
| 10/12/1994 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall advise this court, within 30 days from the date of this order, as to the status of the pending motion filed in the trial court pursuant to D.C. Code 23-110. If the motion in the trial court is denied, review of that denial may be sought only by filing a separate notice of appeal, after which the two appeals will be consolidated. See Hall v. US. (By: WHN) | |
| 10/20/1994 | | STATEMENT filed by appellant's counsel, in reference to the 23-110 motion. | |
| 12/02/1994 | | ORDER that counsel for the appellant shall advise this court, within 30 days from the date of this order, as to the status of the pending motion filed in the trial court pursuant to D.C. Code 23-110. If the motion in the trial court is denied, review of that denial may be sought only by filing a separate notice of appeal, after that two appeals will be consolidated. See Hall V. United States, 559 A.2d 1321, 1322 (D.C. 1989) (By WHN) | |
| 12/13/1994 | | STMT/STATUS REPORT RE PENDING TRIAL COURT MOTION filed by Paul H. Zuckerberg, counsel for appellant. | |
| 02/03/1995 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall advise this co urt within 30 days from the date of this order as to the status of the pending motion filed in the trial court pursuant to D.C. Code 23-110. If the motion in the trial court is denied, review of that denial may be sought only by filing a separate notice of appeal, after which the two appeals will be consolidated. See Hall v. US, 559 A.2d 1321, 1322 (D.C. 1989). (By WHG) | |
| 02/03/1995 | | STMT/STATUS REPORT RE PENDING TRIAL COURT MOTION | |
| 02/08/1995 | | STMT/STATUS REPORT RE PENDING TRIAL COURT MOTION | |
| 05/16/1995 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall advise this court, within 30 days from the date of this order, as to the status of the pending motion filed in the trial court pursuant to D.C. Code 23-110. If the motion filed in the trial court is denied, review of that denial may be sought only by filing a separate notice of appeal, after which the two appeals will be consolidated. See Hall v. United States, 559 A.2d 1321, 1322 (D.C. 1989). (By: WHN) | |
| 05/24/1995 | | STMT/STATUS REPORT RE PENDING TRIAL COURT MOTION | |
| 06/07/1995 | | STATEMENT - of aplt 10th 23-110 status report | |
| 07/28/1995 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall advise this court, within 30 days from the date of this order, as to the status of the pending motion filed in the trial court pursuant to D.C. Code 23-110. If the motion filed in the trial court is denied, review of that denial may be sought only by filing a separate notice of appeal, after which the two appeals will be consolidated. See Hall v. United States, 559 A.2d 1321, 1322 (D.C. 1989). (By: WHN) | |
| 08/03/1995 | | STMT/STATUS REPORT RE PENDING TRIAL COURT MOTION (11th) | |
| 10/17/1995 | | STMT/STATUS REPORT RE PENDING TRIAL COURT MOTION | |
| 12/19/1995 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall advise this court, within 30 days from the date of this order, as to the status of the pending motion filed in the trial court pursuant to D.C. Code 23-110. If the motion filed in the trial court is denied, review of that denial may be sought only by filing a separate notice of appeal, after which the two appeals will be consolidated. See Hall v. United States, 559 A.2d 1321, 1322 (D.C. 1989). (By: WHN) | |
| 12/26/1995 | | STMT/STATUS REPORT RE PENDING TRIAL COURT MOTION (13th) | |
| 04/30/1996 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall advise this court, within 30 days from the date of this order, as to the status of the pending motion filed in the trial court pursuant to D.C. Code 23-110. If the motion filed in the trial court is denied, review of that denial may be sought only by filing a separate notice of appeal, after which the two appeals will be consolidated. See Hall v. United States, 559 A.2d 1321, 1322 (D.C. 1989). (By: JAC) | |
| 06/11/1996 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall advise this court, within 30 days from the date of this order, as to the status of the pending motion filed in the trial court pursuant to D.C. Code 23-110. If the motion filed in the trial court is denied, review of that denial may be sought only by filing a separate notice of appeal, after which the two appeals will be consolidated. See Hall v. United States, 559 A.2d 1321, 1322 (D.C. 1989). (By: GP) | |
| 07/01/1996 | | ORDERED, sua sponte, that the stay entered by this court on March 4, 1994, in appeal no. 93-CF-786 is hereby vacated. It is F/O, sua sponte, that appeals nos. 93-CF-786 and 96-CO-652 are consolidated for all purposes herein. It is F/O that Paul H. Zukerberg, Esquire, is appointed to represent appellant in appeal no. 96-CO-652 , It is F/O that counsel for appellant shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, file the docketing statement in appeal no. 96-CO-652. (BY: AMW) | |
| 07/01/1996 | | PROCEED WITH APPEAL, NO LONGER ON HOLD/STAYED | |
| 07/09/1996 | | RECORD ON APPEAL | |
| 07/12/1996 | | RECEIVED - ADS (96-CO-652) | |
| 07/17/1996 | | APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT (96-CO-652) | |
| 08/12/1996 | | ORDER: The brief of appellant shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. Any request for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (By: GP) | |
| 10/18/1996 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, file the brief, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the brief out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the brief or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply with this order may result in counsel's appointment being vacated. (By: GP) | |
| 11/08/1996 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF for 93 CF 786 & 96 CO 652 (unopposed) | |
| 11/08/1996 | | RECEIVED appellant's brief for 93 CF 786 & 96 CO 652 | |
| 11/18/1996 | | ORDER: Grant motion of appellant for leave to file the brief, and the lodged brief of appellant is filed. F/O that the brief of appellee shall be filed on or before December 10, 1996. (By: GP) | |
| 11/18/1996 | | APPELLANT'S BRIEF | |
| 12/10/1996 | | APPELLEE'S BRIEF | |
| 12/10/1996 | | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |
| 12/27/1996 | | FINAL SCREENING - SUMMARY CALENDAR I | |
| 03/20/1997 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | |
| 03/20/1997 | | SUBMITTED (WG,SC,BE) | |
| 03/28/1997 | | AFFIRMED MOJ (WG,SC,BE) | |
| 04/22/1997 | | MANDATE ISSUED | |