| Events |
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result |
| 05/20/1993 | | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |
| 06/14/1993 | | APPOINTING COUNSEL/CO REFERRAL (CJA) Irwin A. Goldberg, Esq. | |
| 06/28/1993 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DS | |
| 06/28/1993 | | RECEIVED aplt's docketing statement | |
| 07/01/1993 | | RECORD ON APPEAL | |
| 07/02/1993 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (75-pgs/schoch 2/25/93 proc.) | |
| 07/15/1993 | | ORDER GRANTING APLT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DS and the docketing statement is filed. (By WHN) | |
| 07/15/1993 | | APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT | |
| 10/04/1993 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #2 (311 pages--Hawkins) (3/1,2,3,4/93 proceedings) | |
| 10/04/1993 | | RECORD COMPLETED | |
| 10/22/1993 | | ORDER that the brief of appellant shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order, and the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. Any request for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (by: Ng) | |
| 12/15/1993 | | ORDER that counsel for appellant shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, file the brief, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the brief out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the brief or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply may result in counsel's appointment being vacated. (by: WHN) | |
| 12/17/1993 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF | |
| 12/17/1993 | | RECEIVED- aplt's brief | |
| 01/07/1994 | | ORDER GRANTING APLT MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEFand the lodged brief is filed. F/O that the brief of appellee shall be filed on or before January 20, 1994. (by: WHN) | |
| 01/07/1994 | | APPELLANT'S BRIEF | |
| 01/21/1994 | | APPELLEE'S BRIEF | |
| 01/21/1994 | | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |
| 02/15/1994 | | FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR | |
| 04/04/1994 | | STATEMENT - stipulation filed by the parties stipulating that the recrod on appeal be supplemented with the attached transcript of appellant's videotaped statement. | |
| 04/08/1994 | | Trans to division on vote stipulation to supplement the record and proposed order | |
| 04/12/1994 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO SUBMIT ON BRIEF (NO OPPO). | |
| 04/14/1994 | | ORDER - Grant on behalf of the merits division the stipulation to supplement the record on appeal and appellee shall make the necessary arrangements to have Government's Exhibit #2 transmitted to this court forthwith as a supplemental record. WHN | |
| 04/14/1994 | | Trans to division on vote consent motion rec'd on 4/12 to submit on briefs | |
| 04/18/1994 | | exhibits to supplement record (pursuant to order of April 14, 1994) | |
| 04/28/1994 | | ORDER GRANT APLT MOTION TO SUBMIT WITHOUT ARGUMENTWHN | |
| 05/06/1994 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #3 (Copy of videotaped statement of Tadesse Desta (Gov't Ex. No. 2). | |
| 05/17/1994 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | |
| 05/17/1994 | | SUBMITTED (TE,ST,KG) | |
| 05/25/1994 | | AFFIRMED MOJ (TE,ST,KG) | |
| 06/16/1994 | | MANDATE ISSUED | |
| 12/23/1994 | | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for leave to file petition for rehearing of criminal appeal | |
| 12/23/1994 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS | |
| 12/23/1994 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL | |
| 01/20/1995 | | ORDER deny aplt's motion for appointment of counsel. Further Ordered that the motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as moot since aplt is proceeding in forma pauperis. Further Ordered that the motion for leave to file pet. is granted and aplt shall file the pet. for rehearing w/i 30 days from the date of this order. Further extensions of time will be granted only under extraordinary circumstances. (TE,ST,KG) | |
| 02/22/1995 | | APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR REHEARING | |
| 07/20/1995 | | ORDER The matter is before the court on appellant Tadesse Desta's pro se motion for re-hearing of appeal from criminal conviction in which he challenges the effectiveness of the appellate counsel, claiming that counsel never contacted him during the pendency of the appeal or sought his input concerning possible appellate issues. We hereby request appellate counsel, Irwin A. Goldberg, Esquire, to respond to these claims, as well as any other allegations made by appellant in the pro se motion concerning his representation of Desta, a copy of which is attached, within 30 days of this order with a copy of the response being provided to appellant. (TESTKG) | |
| 08/16/1995 | | APPELLANT'S ANSWER/RESPONSE to motion for re-hearing of appeal from criminal conviction | |
| 09/26/1995 | | ORDER On consideration of appellant's pro se petition for rehearing, which we construe as a motion to recall the mandate, and appellate counsel's response thereto, it is Ordered that the motion is denied, without prejudice to appellant's seeking relief in the Superior Court, under D.C. Code Sec. 23-110, on his claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, and, in the particular circumstances of this case, without need of a showing of cause and prejudice for not having raised that claim during the pendency of the direct appeal. (TESTKG) | |
| 10/02/1995 | | RECEIVED - pro se ltr from aplt to provide info useful to PENDING (?) appeal. | |