| Events |
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result |
| 04/13/1993 | | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |
| 05/06/1993 | | ORDER, SUA SPONTE, CONSOLIDATING APPEAL nos. 93cf492 and 93cf522 are consolidted for all purposes herein. F/O that W. Douglas Wham, Esquire, is appointed to represent appellant herein. F/O that appellant shall file the docketing statements for the above captioned appeals within 15 days from the date of this order. (BY JWR) | |
| 05/06/1993 | | APPOINTING COUNSEL/CO REFERRAL (CJA) W. Douglas Wham, Esq. | |
| 05/21/1993 | | APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT | |
| 06/24/1993 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (353 pgs. - Schoch) (2/22 - 2/24/93 proc.) | |
| 10/29/1993 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #2 (279 pages--Shaw) (2/17 thru 19/93 proceedings) | |
| 10/29/1993 | | RECORD COMPLETED | |
| 02/15/1994 | | ORDER: The brief of appellant shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order and the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. Any requests for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only in extraordinary circumstances. (By WHN) | |
| 03/24/1994 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF UNTIL APRIL 28, 1994. | |
| 03/31/1994 | | ORDER: Grant the motion of appellant for an extension of time within which to file the brief and the brief of appellant shall be filed on or before April 27, 1994____. Any further request for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (By WHN) | |
| 04/20/1994 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO STAY BRIEFING SCHEDULE. | |
| 05/13/1994 | | ORDER GRANTING APPELLANT MOTION FOR STAY, and this appeal is hereby stayed pending further order of this court. If the motion in the trial court is denied, review of that denial may be sought only by filing a separate notice of appeal, after which the two appeals will be consolidated. See Hall v. United States, 559 A.2d 1321, 1322 (D.C. 1989). Counsel for appeal shall, supply this court within 10 days from the date of this order, a copy of the 23-110 motion pending in the trial court. (By JMF) | |
| 05/19/1994 | | RECEIVED copies of two pending trial court motions filed under 23 D.C. Code sec. 110, one filed by counsel and the other by appellant proceeding pro-se. | |
| 07/27/1994 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shalll advise this court, within 30 days from the date of this order, as to the status of the pending motion filed in the trial court pursuant to D.C. Code 23-110. If the motion filed in the trial court is denied, review of that denial may be sought only be filing a separate notice of appeal, after which the two appeals will be consolidated. See Hall v. US. (By: WHN) | |
| 08/22/1994 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #3 (6 pages--Sargent-Burns) (12/11/92 proc.) | |
| 08/22/1994 | | STATEMENT - appellant's status report on pending trial court motions. | |
| 08/24/1994 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #3 (6 pages--Taped) (2/16/93 proc.) | |
| 08/29/1994 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #4 (20 pgs -- Allison) (11/3/92 and 11/6/92 proc.) | |
| 09/01/1994 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #5 (6 pages--Tape) (2/16/93 proc.) | |
| 09/13/1994 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #3 (3-pgs/herzfeld 12/4/92 proc.) | |
| 09/14/1994 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD # (5-pgs/janifer 11/9/92 proc.) | |
| 10/03/1994 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #9 (6-pgs/1/11/93 proc.) (10/27/92 proc. Hogue) | |
| 10/12/1994 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall advise this court, within 30 days from the date of this order, as to the status of the pending motion filed in the trial court pursuant to D.C. Code 23-110. If the motion in the trial court is denied, review of that denial may be sought only be filing a separate notice of appeal, after which the two appeals will be consolidated. See Hall v. US. (By: WHN) | |
| 11/02/1994 | | STATEMENT filed by appellant's counsel, status report on pedning trial court motions. | |
| 12/22/1994 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall advise this court, within 30 days from the date of this order, as to the status of the pending motion filed in the trial court pursuant to D.C. Code 23-110. If the motion filed in the trial court is denied, review of that denial may be sought only by filing a separate notice of appeal, after which the two appeals will be consolidated. See Hall v. US. (By: WHN) | |
| 01/17/1995 | | STMT/STATUS REPORT RE PENDING TRIAL COURT MOTION | |
| 03/08/1995 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall advise this co urt within 30 days from the date of this order as to the status of the pending motion filed in the trial court pursuant to D.C. Code 23-110. If the motion in the trial court is denied, review of that denial may be sought only by filing a separate notice of appeal, after which the two appeals will be consolidated. See Hall v. US, 559 A.2d 1321, 1322 (D.C. 1989). (By WHG) | |
| 04/04/1995 | | STMT/STATUS REPORT RE PENDING TRIAL COURT MOTION | |
| 05/17/1995 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall advise this court, within 30 days from the date of this order, as to the status of the pending motion filed in the trial court pursuant to D.C. Code 23-110. If the motion filed in the trial court is denied, review of that denial may be sought only by filing a separate notice of appeal, after which the two appeals will be consolidated. See Hall v. United States, 559 A.2d 1321, 1322 (D.C. 1989). (By: WHN) | |
| 06/19/1995 | | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION - for leave to late file the attached status report on pending trial court motion | |
| 06/19/1995 | | RECEIVED - aplt's status report on pending trial court motion | |
| 11/29/1995 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall advise this court, within 30 days from the date of this order, as to the status of the pending motion filed in the trial court pursuant to D.C. Code 23-110. If the motion filed in the trial court is denied, review of that denial may be sought only by filing a separate notice of appeal, after which the two appeals will be consolidated. See Hall v. United States, 559 A.2d 1321, 1322 (D.C. 1989). (By: WHN) (SW) | |
| 12/18/1995 | | STMT/STATUS REPORT RE PENDING TRIAL COURT MOTION | |
| 04/02/1996 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall advise this court, within 30 days from the date of this order, as to the status of the pending motion filed in the trial court pursuant to D.C. Code 23-110. If the motion filed in the trial court is denied, review of that denial may be sought only by filing a separate notice of appeal, after which the two appeals will be consolidated. See Hall v. United States, 559 A.2d 1321, 1322 (D.C. 1989). (By: JAC) | |
| 04/04/1996 | | STMT/STATUS REPORT RE PENDING TRIAL COURT MOTION | |
| 07/02/1996 | | error | |
| 07/09/1996 | | ORDERED, sua sponte, that the stay entered by this court on May 13, 1994, in appeals nos. 93-CF-492 and 93-CF-522 are hereby vacated. It is F/O, sua sponte, that appeals nos. 93-CF-492, 93-CF-522 and 96-CO-738 are consolidated for all purposes herein. It is F/O that W. Douglas Wham, Esquire, is appointed to represent appellant in appeal no. 96-CO-738. It is F/O that counsel for appellant shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, file the docketing statement in appeal no. 96-CO-738. | |
| 07/09/1996 | | PROCEED WITH APPEAL, NO LONGER ON HOLD/STAYED | |
| 07/22/1996 | | APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT for 96 CO 738 | |
| 07/25/1996 | | RECORD ON APPEAL for 96 CO 738 | |
| 09/04/1996 | | ORDER: The brief of appellant shall be filed wit hin 40 days from the date of this order, and the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days th ereafter. See D.C. App. R. 31. Any request for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (By: GP) | |
| 09/19/1996 | | RECEIVED stipulation of parties to supplement record on appeal filed in the Superior Court-Felony Division | |
| 10/11/1996 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #10 (stipulation of parties to supplement record) | |
| 10/11/1996 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF for 30 days 11/14/96 no oppo | |
| 10/25/1996 | | ORD GRANT APLT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF and the brief of appellant shall be filed on or before November 14, 1996. Any further request for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (BY: GPJ) | |
| 11/12/1996 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF (Maurice Fields) to 12/16/96 no oppo | |
| 12/16/1996 | | RECEIVED appellant's brief for 93 CF 492, 93 CF 522 & 96 CO 738 (pending maxb) | |
| 12/24/1996 | | ORD GRANT APLT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF and the lodged brief of appellant is filed. It is F/O that the brief of appellee shall be filed on or before January 21, 1997. (BY: JAC for GPJ) | |
| 12/24/1996 | | APPELLANT'S BRIEF (Consolidated) | |
| 01/13/1997 | | APPELLEE'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to and including February 20, 1997. (unopposed) | |
| 01/27/1997 | | ORDER: Grant the motion of appellee for an extension of time, and the brief of appellee shall be filed on or before February 20, 1997_______. Any further request for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (By: GP) (sw) | |
| 02/19/1997 | | APPELLEE'S MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE BRIEF to and including March 24, 1997. (unopposed) | |
| 03/06/1997 | | ORDERED that the unopposed motion is granted, and the brief of appellee shall be filed on or before March 24, 1997. Any further request for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (GP) | |
| 03/24/1997 | | APPELLEE'S BRIEF | |
| 03/24/1997 | | BRIEFS COMPLETED | |
| 04/07/1997 | | APLT MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF to 4/21/ | |
| 04/07/1997 | | FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR | |
| 04/07/1997 | | LETTER TO COUNSEL/PARTY RE FUTURE CALENDARING | |
| 04/14/1997 | | ORD GRANT APLT MO TO EXT TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF and the reply brief of appellant shall be filed on or before April 21, 1997. Any further request for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only upon a showing of good cause. (BY: GPJ) | |
| 04/21/1997 | | APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF | |
| 06/05/1997 | Filed | ACTION - Argued / Submitted | |
| 06/05/1997 | | ARGUED (ST,KG,GA) W. Douglas Wham, Esquire, for appellant. Stuart G. Nash, Esquire, for appeelee. | |
| 08/14/1997 | | AFFIRMED Opinion | |
| 09/05/1997 | | MANDATE ISSUED | |
| 02/12/1998 | | COPY OF PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI DENIED on March 9, 1998. | |