judyrecords
search tips
760 million+
United States Court Cases

District Of Columbia Court Of Appeals Record

CONFEDERATE MEMORIAL ASSOC., INC. V ROBERT E. LEE, CHAPTER

Case Information: 92-CV-0053
Short Caption:CONFEDERATE MEMORIAL ASSOC., INC. V ROBERT E. LEE, CHAPTERClassification:Appeals - Civil - Other Civil
Superior Court or Agency Case Number:CA5211-88Filed Date:01/15/1992

Opening Event Date:01/15/1992Case Status:Closed
Record Completed:03/17/1992Post-Decision Matter Pending:
Briefs Completed:10/27/1992
Argued/Submitted:05/19/1993
Disposition:Next Scheduled Action:
Mandate Issued:11/22/1993

Party Information
Appellate RoleParty NameIFPAttorney(s)Arguing AttorneyE-Filer
AppellantConfederate Memorial Association, Inc.N
David J. Bartone YN
AppelleeRobert E. Lee Chapter United Daughters of the ConN
Herbert N. Harmon YN

Events
Event DateStatusDescriptionResult
01/15/1992NOTICE OF APPEAL
01/27/1992DESIGNATION OF RECORD
01/27/1992APPELLANT'S DOCKETING STATEMENT
01/27/1992$50.00 DOCKETING FEE
03/05/1992COPY OF SUPERIOR COURT LETTER
03/17/1992RECORD ON APPEAL
03/17/1992RECORD COMPLETED
08/19/1992ORDER: The brief of appellant shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order and the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days thereafter. Any requests for an extension of time will be looked upon with disfavor and granted only in extraordinary circumstances. (By JAC)
09/28/1992APPELLANT'S BRIEF
10/27/1992APPELLEE'S BRIEF
10/27/1992BRIEFS COMPLETED
10/29/1992SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD #1 (28 pgs. - boston) (12/5/90 proc.)
11/12/1992APPELLANT'S REPLY BRIEF
01/26/1993FINAL SCREENING - REGULAR CALENDAR
05/19/1993FiledACTION - Argued / Submitted
05/19/1993ARGUED (TE,FA,MA) David J. Bartone, Esquire, for appellant. Nicholas G. Karambelas, Esquire, for appellee.
08/12/1993AFFIRMED Opinion
08/26/1993APLT'S PETITION FOR REHEARING/REHEARING EN BANC
10/29/1993ORD DENY APPELLANT'S PETITION FOR REH/REH EN BANC (EB)
11/17/1993MOTION(S) FEE PAID for mems.
11/17/1993APPELLEE'S MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION for damages under DCCA Rule 38.
11/22/1993MANDATE ISSUED
12/03/1993APPELLANT'S OPPOSITION to motion for damages under DCCA Rule 38.
12/07/1993TMC - Appellee's motion for damages - Appellant's opposition
12/07/1993APPELLEE'S REPLY- to the opposition of aplts to the motion of the aples for damages under D.C.C.A. rule 38
03/17/1994ORDER DENY APLE MISCELLANEOUS SUBSTANTIVE MOTION for damages. (by: TEFAMK)