| Events |
| Event Date | Status | Description | Result |
| 10/07/1992 | | NOTICE OF APPEAL | |
| 10/27/1992 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY REVERSAL | |
| 10/27/1992 | | APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY REVERSAL | |
| 10/28/1992 | | SUPPLEMENTAL RECORD - #3 (ord Judge Ryan dtd 9/30/92) | |
| 11/05/1992 | | APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL | |
| 11/05/1992 | | APPELLEE'S OPPOSITION to aplt's motion for summary reversal | |
| 11/05/1992 | | APPELLEE'S MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL | |
| 12/01/1992 | | APPOINTING COUNSEL/CO REFERRAL (CJA) Betty J. Clark, Esq. | |
| 12/01/1992 | | ORDER: The stay issued on October 21, 1992, in appeal no 92-cf-8 is hereby lifted. F/O, sua sponte, that appeal nos 92-cf-8 and 92-co-1217 are consolidated for all purposes herein. F/O that Betty J. Clark, Esquire, is hereby appointed to represent appellant in 92-co-1217. F/O that appellant shall file the docketing statement in appeal no 92-co-1217 within 15 days from the date of this order. F/O that the motion of appellant for summary reversal, the opposition thereto, and the motion of appellee to dismiss this appeal are hereby referred to a motions division of this court for consideration. (BY JWR) | |
| 12/01/1992 | | PROCEED WITH APPEAL, NO LONGER ON HOLD/STAYED | |
| 12/02/1992 | | TMC - 10/27 masrv, 11/5 reop & 11/5 medis | |
| 12/04/1992 | | RECORD ON APPEAL in 92 CO 1217 | |
| 04/20/1993 | | APPELLANT'S BRIEF | |
| 09/01/1993 | | VOTE SHEET masrv, reop, medis | |
| 09/24/1993 | | ORDER DENY APPELLANT MOTION FOR SUMMARY REVERSAL (By ST, PY, MK) | |
| 09/24/1993 | | ORDER DENY APLE MOTION TO DISMISS/WITHDRAW APPEAL F/O that the brief of appellee shall be filed within 30 days from the date of this order. (By ST, PY, MK) | |
| 09/29/1993 | | STATUS REPORT from appellant | |
| 10/07/1993 | | RECEIVED - exhibit A (2nd ex parte motion to appoint counsel for 23-110) | |
| 10/25/1993 | | APPELLEE'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION for clarification of the court's 9/24/93 order and for an extension of time to file the brief to 30 days after court clarifies 9/24/93 order. | |
| 12/10/1993 | | RECEIVED- supplement to aple's motion for clarification and for extension of time for motion for new briefing schedule | |
| 03/11/1994 | | ORDER GRANTING appellee's motion for clarification and for extension of time and appellee shall file brief all issues in appeal nos. 92-CF-8, 92-CO-1217, and 93-CO-1604; 93-CF-654 and 93-CO-1604 are severed and 93-CO-1604 is consolidated with previously consolidated nos. 92-CF-8 and 92-CO-1217; the brief of appellant in 93-CO-1604 shall be filed within 40 days from the date of this order and the consolidated brief of appellee in nos. 92-CF-8, 92-CO-1217, and 93-CO-1604 shall be filed within 30 days thereafter; the appointment of Michael L. Spekter, Esquire, as counsel for appellany in no. 93-CO-1604 is vacated, and Betty J. Clark, Esquire, is appointed for appellant; sua sponte, consolidate 93-CF-1312 and 93-CF-1357 with no. 93-CF-654; the briefs of appellants in nos. 93-CF-654, 93-CF-1312, and 93-CF-1357 shall be filed within 40 days after the complete records on appeal have been filed with this court. (By ST-MK-PY) | |
| 05/04/1994 | | ORDER: Counsel for appellant shall, in no. 93co1604, within 15 days from the date of this order, file the brief, accompanied by a motion for leave to file the brief out of time. The motion should set forth good cause for the failure either to timely file the brief or to request an extension of time within which to do so. Failure to comply may result in counsel's appointment being vacated. (By: WHN) | |
| 05/11/1994 | | MEMORANDUM voucher# 721677 issued by Superior Court was paid this date by DCCA. Attorney was never appointed by the trial court to file the 23-110 motion. Betty Clark was paid $1136.00, she claimed $1136.90 on the voucher. (Ferren) | |
| 07/18/1994 | | COUNSEL'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW (ANDERS) | |
| 09/20/1994 | | APPELLANT'S MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURAL MOTION (consent motion to amend briefing schedule) | |
| 09/22/1994 | | ORDER: Appellant shall file by November 4, 1994, any response showing cause why counsel's motion should not be granted, the appeal dismissed, and the judgment from which the appeal was taken affirmed. Failure to respond shall result in the motion being submitted for decision on the motion and record alone. (By RO) | |
| 09/22/1994 | | In the Above case, your court-appointed counsel has filed a motion to withdraw from this appeal. If you wish, you may file a response to your attorney's motion by the date set forth in the attached order. In your response, you should set out your reasons why your attorney should not be permitted to withdraw. You may also set forth any grounds for appeal you believe you may have. In the event you need additional time within which to respond, you must advise the court in writing using the self addressed stamped envelope provided. After your response has been received or the time for filing has expired, the motion and any response you may make will be submitted to the court for its consideration. The court will also review the record of the trial proceedings including the court reporter's transcript. If the court concludes the appeal lacks merit and grants the motion of your court-appointed counsel to withdraw, the appeal may be dismissed. Therefore, it is important that you file a response to the motion if your believe there are grounds for appeal. (By WHN) | |
| 10/12/1994 | | RECEIVED pro-se motion to produce records. | |
| 11/15/1994 | | TMC - 7/18 Motion for leave to withdraw | |
| 04/06/1995 | | ORDER that appellant shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, show cause why appeal nos. 92-CO-1217 and 93-CO-1604 should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as having been taken from non-final orders. F/O that the motion of counsel for appellant to withdraw is held in abeyance pending compliance with this court order. (by: SCGABE) | |
| 05/30/1995 | | TMC - Cnsl's mot for lv to w/draw. Aplt's ltr to the courts & pro se mot to produce records, construed as aplt's response to counsel's mot to w/draw. Order to show cause. | |
| 06/30/1995 | | ORDER that appeal nos. 92-CO-1217 and 93-CO-1604 are hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as having been taken from non-final orders. (by: SCGABE) | |
| 06/30/1995 | | ORDER DENYING COUNSEL'S MOTION FOR LV TO WITHDRAW from appeal no. 93-CO-1604 AS MOOT F/O that the brief of appellee in appeal no. 92-CF-8 shall be filed within 30 days from the date of this order. (by: SCGABE) | |
| 06/30/1995 | | DISMISSED | |
| 07/24/1995 | | MANDATE ISSUED | |
| 09/26/1995 | | error | |