| Case Information: 42764 | |||
| Short Caption: | CROM VS. MOMENTUM DEVELOPMENT C/W 42432 | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Consolidated: | 42432 *, 42764 | Related Case(s): | 39783 , 42432 |
| Lower Court Case(s): | Washoe Co. - Second Judicial District - CV0200453 | Classification: | Civil Appeal - General - Other |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Disposition Filed/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | 02/19/2004 / Allison, George | SP Status: | Completed |
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | How Submitted: | ||
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 02/06/2004 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee due. | ||
| 02/06/2004 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Settlement. Notice re: settlement conference program/suspension of rules mailed to all counsel. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) | 04-02408 | |
| 02/06/2004 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee. Due Date: 10 days. | ||
| 02/13/2004 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $250.00 from McDonald Carano Wilson LLP--check no. 46964. | ||
| 02/13/2004 | Letter/Incoming | Filed Letter. from attorney Paul Georgeson re: two case numbers for this appeal. Nos. 42432 and 42764 (not consolidated). | 04-02848 | |
| 02/19/2004 | Settlement Notice | Issued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: George V. Allison. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts suspended pending further order of this court.) | ||
| 02/24/2004 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Letter. to attorney Paul Georgeson in response to his correspondence dated February 11, 2004. Nos. 42432 and 42764 (not consolidated). | 04-03572 | |
| 03/02/2004 | Motion | Filed Motion to Consolidate. Stipulation to Consolidate Appeals. Nos. 42432 and 42764. | 04-03926 | |
| 03/10/2004 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. Granting Motions and Consolidating Appeals. In No. 42432, appellants have moved for leave to amend the district court judgment on grounds of clerical mistake. Respondents oppose the motion, but still request that the judgment be amended. Appellants have also moved for leave to file a reply to respondents' opposition. Cause appearing, we grant appellants leave to file a reply to respondents' opposition. The clerk shall detach and file the reply appended to appellants' motion as Exhibit A. Cause appearing, we grant the parties leave to pursue, in the district court, correction of any clerical mistakes that may exist in the district court's judgment. Because it is the within the district court's discretion as to whether to correct its judgment, we deny the parties' request for this court to make such decisions. No leave of this court is necessary for the district court to consider the merits of a proper NRCP 60(b) motion. In the event the district court is inclined to grant relief under NRCP 60(b), the parties must comply with the procedures for remand set forth in Huneycutt. The parties must provide this court with an order of the district certifying its inclination to grant the parties' requested relief. Cause appearing, we approve the stipulation to consolidate these appeals. These appeals are consolidated for all appellate purposes. Nos. 42432/42764 [04-04500] | ||
| 03/11/2004 | Motion | Filed Response to Motion. Respondents' Opposition to Appellants' Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Points and Authorities. (Filed in 42432 only.) Nos. 42432/42764 | ||
| 04/07/2004 | Settlement Program Report | Filed Interim Settlement Program Report. The settlement conference is continued to the following date: June 21, 2004. Nos. 42432/42764. (04-06410) | ||
| 04/19/2004 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Denying Motion. for Reconsideration. On March 10, 2004, this court entered an order that granted, in part, appellants' motion for leave to amend the district court judgment on grounds of clerical mistake. The order also granted appellants' motion for leave to file a reply to respondents' opposition. On March 11, 2004, respondents filed an opposition to appellants' motion for leave to file a reply. We elect to treat respondents' opposition as a motion for reconsideration of our order of March 10, 2004, to the extent that order granted appellants' motion for leave to file a reply. No good cause appearing, we deny respondents' motion for reconsideration. Nos. 42432/42764. (04-07100) | ||
| 06/21/2004 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Amended/Supplemental. | 04-11260 | |
| 06/22/2004 | Notice/Outgoing | Letter. George V. Allison. (Amended Notice of Appeal) | ||
| 06/23/2004 | Settlement Program Report | Filed Interim Settlement Program Report. The parties have agreed to a settlement of this matter. Nos. 42432/42764. (04-11395) | ||
| 07/23/2004 | Motion | Filed Stipulation/Dismiss Appeal. Nos. 42432/42764 [04-13388] | ||
| 07/27/2004 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Stipulated Dismissal. Pursuant to the settlement conference, the stipulation of the parties and cause appearing, " . . . these consolidated appeals are dismissed." The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. NRAP 42(b). NNP/CLK. Nos. 42432/42764 | 04-13649 | |
| 07/27/2004 | Case Status Update | Case Closed. No remittitur issued. | ||