| Case Information: 42786 | |||
| Short Caption: | FOGGY VS. EMPLOYERS INS. CO. OF NEV. | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Related Case(s): | 39200 | ||
| Lower Court Case(s): | Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A444001 | Classification: | Civil Appeal - Family Law - Proper Person |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | How Submitted: | ||
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 02/13/2004 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee due. | ||
| 02/13/2004 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. | 04-02862 | |
| 02/13/2004 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee. Due Date: 10 days | ||
| 03/19/2004 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order of Affirmance. The district court followed this court's directive on remand, and we must now " . . . affirm the district court's order." fn3[Although appellant was not granted leave to proceed in proper person, see NRAP 46(b), we have received and considered appellant's motion. Appellant has submitted a motion for leave from this court to proceed in forma pauperis, but his motion does not comply with NRAP 24(a). An appellant must fires file a motion in the district court for permission to proceed in forma pauperis. Appellant's failure to pay the supreme court filing fee or to comply with NRAP 24(a) could constitute a basis on which to dismiss this appeal.] NNP04-NB/DA/MG | 04-05207 | |
| 04/13/2004 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | 04-06349 | |
| 04/13/2004 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
| 05/13/2004 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on April 15, 2004. | 04-06349 | |