search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record


Case Information: 42776
Short Caption:SCHROEDER VS. STATE (CIVIL)Court:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Washoe Co. - Second Judicial District - CV0305490Classification:Civil Appeal - General - Other
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:How Submitted:

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
02/11/2004Filing Fee Filing Fee Waived.
02/11/2004Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Settlement. Notice re: settlement conference program/suspension of rules mailed to all counsel. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) 04-02734
02/24/2004Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement. 04-03542
03/09/2004Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice to File Documents. It has been determined that this appeal willl not be scheduled for settlement conference. Transcript request form due: 15 days. Opening Brief due: 120 days.
03/16/2004Transcript RequestFiled Certificate of No Transcript Request. 04-04988
05/11/2004Notice/IncomingFiled Notice of Change of Address. 04-08804
05/14/2004Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Show Cause. Appellant shall have 30 days from the date of this order within which to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. We caution appellant that failure to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction may result in this court's dismissal of the appeal. The briefing schedule in this appeal shall be suspended pending further order from this court. Respondents may file any reply within ten days from the date that appellant's response is served. 04-08988
06/15/2004MotionFiled Motion. Motion to Substitute Parties (w/attached Consent to Substitution of Appellant). 04-10982
06/15/2004MotionFiled Response to Order to Show Cause. 04-10984
07/27/2004Order/DispositionalFiled Order Dismissing Appeal. Appellant timely filed a response to our show cause order and a corresponding motion under NRAP 43 to substitute Stewart Handte, the district court real party in interest, as appellant in this appeal. Although it appears that Handte, an original party to the district court proceedings, may have standing to appeal the district court's order, he may not do so through NRAP 43 substitution. Therefore, we deny appellant's motion to substitute parties. "ORDER this appeal DISMISSED." fn7[As it appears that no notice of the district court order's entry has been served, we note that Handte may still be able to perfect an appeal in this case. See NRAP 4.] NNP04-NB/DA/MG 04-13593
08/24/2004RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 04-13887
08/24/2004Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
08/31/2004RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on August 26, 2004. 04-13887