Docket Entries |
Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
03/08/2005 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee Waived. | | |
03/08/2005 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Fast Track. Fast track appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Fast Track Notice mailed to all counsel.) | | 05-04627 |
03/08/2005 | Transcript Request | Filed Request for Rough Draft Transcript(s). Transcripts requested: 11/1/04, 11/3/04, 11/4/04, 11/5/04 and 1/18/05. Court Reporters: Joe D'Amato and Maureen Schorn. Filed in district court on: March 2, 2005. | | 05-04628 |
03/18/2005 | Transcript | Filed Rough Draft Transcript of Proceedings. Proceedings: 11/03/04. Court Reporter: Maureen Schorn. | | 05-05379 |
04/14/2005 | Motion | Filed Motion to Extend Time. | | 05-07367 |
04/27/2005 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Granting Motion. filed April 14, 2005. Court reporter or recorder Joe D'Amato shall file the requested transcripts within 10 days of this order. The motion for an extension of time is granted. Appellant shall have 20 days from the filing of the transcripts within which to file and serve the fast track statement and appendix. | | 05-08273 |
05/13/2005 | Transcript | Filed Rough Draft Transcript of Proceedings. Proceedings: 11/2/04, 11/4/05, 11/5/05 and 1/18/05. Court Reporter: J.A. D'Amato. | | 05-09420 |
06/28/2005 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. Court reporter Joe D'Amato shall have 10 days from the date of this order to file the transcript from November 1, 2004, or show cause why D'Amato should not be sanctioned. | | 05-12708 |
08/25/2005 | Order/Counsel | Filed Order/Sanctions. To date, no transcript has been provided to this court and there has been no attempt to show cause for the failure to comply with NRAP 3C(d)(3)(iii). Cause appearing, we order court reporter Joe D'Amato to pay sanctions in the amount of one hundred dollars ($100.00) to the Nevada Supreme Court Law Library within 15 days from the date of this order. Moreover, court reporter Joe D'Amato shall provide the requested transcript to this court within 10 days from the date of this order or show cause why he should not be sanctioned further. | | 05-16853 |
09/08/2005 | Transcript | Filed Rough Draft Transcript of Proceedings. Proceedings: November 1, 2004. Court Reporter: Joseph A. D'Amato. | | 05-17741 |
09/13/2005 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Proof of Payment of Sanction. Notice from Supreme Court Law Library that sanction in the amount of $100 has been paid. | | |
10/05/2005 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. All transcripts have been filed. Fast track statement and appendix due: 20 days. | | 05-19770 |
11/10/2005 | Motion | Filed Motion to Extend Time. | | 05-22200 |
12/06/2005 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Denying Motion. Appellant has not demonstrated extreme need or merit, and the motion for a 30-day extension is denied. Fast track statement and appendix due: 10 days. | | 05-23826 |
12/27/2005 | Motion | Filed Motion for Excess Pages. Appellant Alcaraz's Motion for Leave to File 22-Page Fast Track Statement. | | 05-25206 |
12/27/2005 | Motion | Filed Motion to Extend Time. Motion for Extension of Time. | | 05-25207 |
12/27/2005 | Fast Track Brief | Received Fast Track Statement. | | 05-25208 |
01/13/2006 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Granting Motion. The clerk shall file the fast track statement and appendix provisionally submitted on December 27, 2005. | | 06-00937 |
01/13/2006 | Fast Track Brief | Filed Fast Track Statement. | | 05-25208 |
01/13/2006 | Appendix | Filed Appendix to Fast Track Statement. | | 05-25209 |
02/06/2006 | Fast Track Brief | Filed Fast Track Response. | | 06-02620 |
04/14/2006 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. this court has concluded that full briefing is warranted. fn1-[Counsel need not file a new appendix and may utilize the fast track appendix previously filed in this court.] Appellant's counsel shall have 30 days from the date of this order within which to file and serve the opening brief. Additionally, we invite the Nevada Attorneys for Criminal Justice "NACJ" to submit an amicus brief in this appeal respecting the use of photographic and computer-generated re-enactment evidence in criminal trials. Should the NACJ elect to participate in this matter as amicus curiae, we request that it file and serve its amicus brief within 45 days of the date of this order. Thereafter, the State shall have 30 days from the date of service of the amicus brief within which to submit an answering brief responding to appellant's brief, as well as the amicus brief. The reply brief, if any, shall be shall be filed within 30 days of service of the State's answering brief. Upon the completion of briefing, this appeal shall proceed before the en banc court, and the full court will determine in due course whether oral argument is warranted. | | 06-07866 |
05/18/2006 | Motion | Filed Stipulation and Order. Brief due: June 15, 2006. | | 06-10498 |
05/26/2006 | Motion | Filed Stipulation. - To Extend the Time to File Amicus Brief. | | 06-11169 |
06/13/2006 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Stipulation Approved. The NACJ shall have until June 28, 2006, to file and serve its amicus curiae brief. | | 06-12366 |
06/19/2006 | Motion | Filed Motion to Extend Time. | | 06-12775 |
06/23/2006 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Granting Motion. Opening brief due: June 29, 2006. No further extensions of time shall be permitted absent demonstration of extreme and unforeseeable circumstances. | | 06-13019 |
06/27/2006 | Motion | Filed Motion to Extend Time. Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to file Amicus Brief. | | 06-13229 |
07/03/2006 | Brief | Filed Opening Brief. | | 06-13708 |
08/22/2006 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Granting Motion. Order Filing Amicus Curiae Brief. The clerk shall file the amicus curiae brief received from the NACJ on July 14, 2006. Answering brief due: 30 days. | | 06-17414 |
08/22/2006 | Brief | Filed Amicus Brief. Amicus Brief of Nevada Attorneys for Criminal Justice. | | 06-14614 |
08/28/2006 | Brief | Filed Answering Brief. | | 06-17865 |
09/28/2006 | Motion | Filed Stipulation and Order. Brief due: October 25, 2006. | | 06-19924 |
10/26/2006 | Brief | Filed Reply Brief. | | 06-21989 |
02/15/2007 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice Scheduling Oral Argument. Oral Argument is scheduled for 30 minutes in Las Vegas on April 3, 2007, at 11:00 a.m. (En Banc) | | 07-03770 |
03/20/2007 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Oral Argument Reminder Notice. | | 07-06311 |
04/03/2007 | Letter/Incoming | Filed Letter. from Patrick C. McDonnell, Assistant City Editor Las Vegas Review-Journal, requesting permission to photograph the oral argument in Alcaraz v. State, No. 44830, scheduled for April 3, 2007 at 11:00 a.m. | | 07-07367 |
04/03/2007 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. Permission is granted for photographic coverage of the oral argument to be held on April 3, 2007, at 11:00 a.m., in the above-matter. All persons participating in such photographic coverage shall observe the standards set forth in the Supreme Court Rules in all respects, and Patrick C. McDonnell of the Las Vegas Review Journal is designated as pool coordinator for purposes of organizing and coordinating the orderly coverage of such proceedings by all participants. All equipment shall be placed in the court room before commencement of the oral argument. | | 07-07384 |
04/03/2007 | Case Status Update | Submitted for Decision. Before the En Banc Court. EN BANC. | | |
11/21/2007 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Dispositional Order/Appeal. "We remand this matter to the district court with instructions to vacate the conviction for attempted murder. The conviction for carrying a concealed weapon is affirmed." Fn5 [We note the judgment of conviction incorrectly states that Alcaraz was convicted pursuant to a guilty plea. In fact, Alcaraz was convicted pursuant to a jury verdict. Upon remand, the district court shall correct this error in the judgment of conviction.] EN BANC-WM/MG/JH/RP/MD/MC/NS. | | 07-25493 |
12/07/2007 | Post-Judgment Petition | Filed Petition for Rehearing. | | 07-26575 |
02/20/2008 | Post-Judgment Order | Filed Order/Rehearing Denied. Order Denying Rehearing and Issuing a Corrected Order Affirming in Part and Reversing in Part. "We conclude that rehearing is not warranted." Because the original order was missing two signatures, we issue a corrected Order Affirming in Part and Reversing in Part to be filed contemporaneously with this order. | | 08-04033 |
02/20/2008 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Dispositional Order/Appeal. "We remand this matter to the district court with instructions to vacate the conviction for attempted murder. The conviction for carrying a concealed weapon is affirmed." Fn5 [We note the judgment of conviction incorrectly states that Alcaraz was convicted pursuant to a guilty plea. In fact, Alcaraz was convicted pursuant to a jury verdict. Upon remand, the district court shall correct this error in the judgment of conviction.] EN BANC-WM/MG/JH/RP/MD/MC/NS. | | 08-04035 |
03/18/2008 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | | 08-05108 |
03/18/2008 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | | |
03/21/2008 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on March 18, 2008. | | 08-05108 |