| Case Information: 40454 | |||
| Short Caption: | HUBBARD VS. EMPLOYMENT SECURITY DIV. | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Lower Court Case(s): | Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A449274 | Classification: | Civil Appeal - Family Law - Proper Person |
| Disqualifications: | Leavitt | Case Status: | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | How Submitted: | ||
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 11/06/2002 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee Waived. | ||
| 11/06/2002 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. | 02-19149 | |
| 11/06/2002 | Other | Disqualification of Justice Leavitt. | ||
| 12/30/2002 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order Dismissing Appeal. "ORDER this appeal DISMISSED." fn2[Although appellant was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, see NRAP 46(b), we have considered the proper person documents received from him.] NNP03Y-CY/RR/DA | 02-22195 | |
| 01/24/2003 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | 03-00576 | |
| 01/24/2003 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
| 01/30/2003 | Other | Returned Unfiled Document. Original Proper Person Request to Submit and Request for Reconsideration. | ||
| 02/06/2003 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on January 27, 2003. | 03-00576 | |
| 04/08/2003 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Denying Motion. Denying Motion to Recall Remittitur. NRS 233B.150 authorizes an aggrieved party to appeal a district court's final order deciding a petition for judicial review of an administrative decision, but because the court granted appellant's petition, appellant was not an aggrieved party. fn4[We note that appellant was not left without recourse. Appellant could seek judicial review of any adverse final decision entered on remand to the administrative agency, and could appeal any adverse final district court judgment.] Accordingly, we deny the motion to recall the remittitur. | 03-05847 | |