| Case Information: 42723 | |||
| Short Caption: | TAYLOR WOODROW HOMES VS. DIST. CT. (GRAND LEGACY CMTY. ASSOC.) | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Related Case(s): | 43023 | ||
| Lower Court Case(s): | Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A461086 | Classification: | Original Proceeding - Civil - Mandamus |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | How Submitted: | ||
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 01/30/2004 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $250.00 from Molof & Vohl - check no. 1816. | ||
| 01/30/2004 | Petition/Writ | Filed Petition for Writ of Mandamus. | 04-01996 | |
| 02/03/2004 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice of Procedural Deficiency. Proof of service. Due Date: 10 days | ||
| 02/11/2004 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Proof of Service. (Petition for Writ of Mandamus). | 04-02726 | |
| 02/20/2004 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Answer Writ Petition. The real party in interest, on respondents' behalf, shall have 30 days from this order's date within which to file an answer, including authorities, against issuance of the requested writ. | 04-03259 | |
| 03/11/2004 | Motion | Filed Motion for Stay. Motion for Stay of District Court Proceedings. | 04-04635 | |
| 03/18/2004 | Motion | Filed Motion to Extend Time. Real Party in Interest's Motion for Enlargement of Time to Answer Petitioner's Writ of Mandamus. | 04-05112 | |
| 03/19/2004 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Proof of Service. to Motion for Enlargement of Time to Answer Petitioner's Writ of Mandamus. | 04-05235 | |
| 03/22/2004 | Motion | Filed Response to Motion. Response in Opposition to Petitioners' Motion for Stay of District Court Proceedings. | 04-05318 | |
| 03/29/2004 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Show Cause. Within 20 days of this order's date, petitioners shall show cause why their petition for a writ of mandamus should not be denied on the ground that petitioners seek to compel only a partial dismissal. Pending our receipt and consideration of petitioners' response, we defer ruling on petitioners' stay motion, and we suspend our February 20, 2004 order directing the real party in interest to file an answer. We deny as moot the real party in interest's motion for an extension of time to file an answer. | 04-05831 | |
| 04/19/2004 | Motion | Filed Response to Order to Show Cause. | 04-07160 | |
| 05/06/2004 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order Denying Petition. for Writ of Mandamus. "We deny the petition." fn4[See NRAP 21(b). We deny as moot petitioners' motion for a stay, and we vacate our order directing an answer.] SNP04D-RR/WM/MD | 04-08437 | |
| 06/02/2004 | Remittitur | Issued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur. | 04-08452 | |
| 06/02/2004 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||