judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

MATHEWS (JULIAN) VS. STATE

Case Information: 42388
Short Caption:MATHEWS (JULIAN) VS. STATECourt:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - C63203Classification:Criminal Appeal - Other - Post-Conviction/Proper Person
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:04/01/2004How Submitted:On Record

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
11/21/2003OtherDisqualification of Justice Leavitt.
11/21/2003Filing Fee Filing Fee Waived.
11/21/2003Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. 03-19408
12/19/2003Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Transmit Record. Record due in each of the above-identified appeals: 120 days. See NRAP 11(a)(2) (the complete record shall contain each and every paper, pleading and other document filed, or submitted for filing, in the district court, as well as any previously prepared transcripts of the district court proceedings.) fn1[The record shall not include any physical, non-documentary exhibits or the original documentary exhibits filed in the district court, but copies of documentary exhibits submitted in the district court proceedings shall be transmitted as part of the record on appeal. The record shall also include any presentence investigation reports submitted in this matter. The clerk of the district court shall transmit the reports to this court in a sealed envelope identifying the contents and marked confidential.] Nos. 42388/ 42440/ 42476/ 42477 – cases are not consolidated. 03-21119
04/01/2004Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Copy. Volumes 1 and 2. 04-06054
04/01/2004Case Status Update Submitted for Decision.
10/08/2004Order/DispositionalFiled Order of Affirmance. We conclude that Matthews is not entitled to relief and that briefing and oral argument are unwarranted. "ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED." fn10[We have reviewed all documents that Mathews has submitted in proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent that Mathews has attempted to present claims or facts in those submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance.] NNP04-NB/DA/MG 04-18678
11/03/2004RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 04-18796
11/03/2004Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
12/01/2004RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on November 8, 2004. 04-18796