Case Information: 44342 | |||
Short Caption: | LINDY DENNIS INDUS. VS. DIST. CT. (BRIDGEPORT LLC) | Court: | Supreme Court |
Lower Court Case(s): | Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A453772 | Classification: | Original Proceeding - Civil - Mandamus/Prohibition |
Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Disposition Filed/Case Closed | |
Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
Submission Date: | How Submitted: | ||
+ Party Information |
Docket Entries | ||||
Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
12/06/2004 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $250.00 from Brady, Vorwerck, Ryder & Caspino--check no. 1458. | ||
12/06/2004 | Petition/Writ | Filed Petition for Writ of Mandamus or Prohibition. | 04-22166 | |
12/06/2004 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice of Procedural Deficiency. Affidavit. Due Date: 10 days | ||
01/12/2005 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Show Cause. Petitioners shall have 15 days from the date of this order within which to show cause why this petition should not be denied as moot, or otherwise to inform this court of the underlying district court case's status. A notice of deficiency was issued to petitioners on December 6, 2004, because petitioners did not include the affidavit of the party beneficially interested. The affidavit was due on December 16, 2004. If this petition is not moot, then petitioners shall file the required affidavit within 15 days of the date of this order. | 05-00644 | |
01/27/2005 | Motion | Filed Motion to Dismiss Petition. Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of Writ of Mandamus or, in the Alternative, Writ of Prohibition. | 05-01775 | |
02/17/2005 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order Dismissing Petition. On January 12, 2005, we direct petitioners to show cause why the petition should not be dismissed as moot, because it appeared that the parties had settlement the underlying district court case. Petitioner filed a timely response in the form of a motion for voluntary dismissal of the petition. Petitioners confirm that a settlement has been reached and that the petition is now moot. Accordingly, we grant the motion and " . . . dismiss this petition." NNP05-WM/MD/RP | 05-03178 | |
02/17/2005 | Case Status Update | Case Closed. No notice in lieu of remittitur issued. |