| Case Information: 42821 | |||
| Short Caption: | TRAVELERS VS. WOODWARD | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Lower Court Case(s): | Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A472670 | Classification: | Civil Appeal - Administrative Agency - General |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | 03/16/2004 / Osko, Eugene | SP Status: | Completed |
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | 06/09/2005 | How Submitted: | On Briefs |
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 02/20/2004 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $250.00 from The Law Office of David H. Benavidez--check no. 2917. | ||
| 02/20/2004 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Settlement. Notice re: settlement conference program/suspension of rules mailed to all counsel. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) | 04-03312 | |
| 03/01/2004 | Docketing Statement | Filed Docketing Statement. | 04-03827 | |
| 03/05/2004 | Settlement Notice | Issued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Carolyn Worrell. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts suspended pending further order of this court.) | ||
| 03/16/2004 | Settlement Notice | Issued Notice: Settlement Judge Reassignment. New Settlement Judge: Eugene Osko. | ||
| 03/22/2004 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Amended/Supplemental. | 04-05338 | |
| 03/23/2004 | Notice/Outgoing | Letter. Eugene Osko. (amended notice of appeal) | ||
| 04/07/2004 | Motion | Filed Motion for Stay. | 04-06436 | |
| 04/15/2004 | Motion | Filed Response to Motion. | 04-06926 | |
| 04/19/2004 | Settlement Program Report | Filed Interim Settlement Program Report. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. (Judge Osko recommends the imposition of sanctions on both the Appellant and Appellants counsel.) | 04-07149 | |
| 04/23/2004 | Other | Returned Unfiled Document. Returned, with letter (pursuant to NRAP 27(a)), "Reply to Opposition to Stay." | ||
| 04/29/2004 | Motion | Filed Motion for Permission to File Document. Appellant's Request to File Reply to Opposition for Stay. | 04-07899 | |
| 05/10/2004 | Settlement Order/Procedural | Filed Order: No Settlement/Briefing Reinstated. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement. We reinstate the deadlines for requesting transcripts and filing briefs. Appellant: 15 days to comply with NRAP 9(a); 120 days to file and serve opening brief and appendix. Briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1). | 04-08657 | |
| 05/11/2004 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Granting Motion. filed April 29, 2004. Appellant shall have 5 days from the date of this order to file and serve its reply to respondent's response to appellant's motion for stay. | 04-08693 | |
| 05/13/2004 | Motion | Filed Reply to Response. Reply to Opposition to Stay. | 04-08946 | |
| 05/17/2004 | Transcript Request | Filed Certificate of No Transcript Request. | 04-09152 | |
| 05/20/2004 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. the settlement judge has recommended that sanctions be imposed against appellant and appellant's counsel for "failure to come to the Settlement Conference in good faith, intending to attempt to settle the matter." Accordingly, counsel for appellant shall, within 20 days from the date of this order, file a response to the settlement judge's recommendation. Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions. | 04-09359 | |
| 06/01/2004 | Motion | Filed Response to Order to Show Cause. Response to the Order for Recommended Sanctions. | 04-09982 | |
| 06/02/2004 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Denying Motion. for Stay. We have considered appellant's motion for a stay, and we are not persuaded that a stay is warranted at this time. Accordingly, we deny appellant's motion. | 04-10136 | |
| 09/01/2004 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. This court entered an order directing counsel for appellant to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed pursuant to the recommendation of the settlement judge. Counsel for appellant has filed a response to that order. In that response counsel represents that he and appellant participated in the settlement conference in good faith. Counsel explains that his client wished this court to resolve the appeal on the merits as the case presents an issue of first impression that 'clearly requires precedent from Nevada's highest state court.' Additionally, we note that appellant filed a settlement conference statement and attended the settlement conference proceedings with authority to settle as required by NRAP 16. Accordingly, we conclude that the imposition of sanctions is not proper under these circumstances. | 04-15899 | |
| 09/07/2004 | Brief | Filed Opening Brief. | 04-16224 | |
| 09/07/2004 | Appendix | Filed Joint Appendix. | 04-16225 | |
| 10/01/2004 | Brief | Filed Answering Brief. | 04-18181 | |
| 10/06/2004 | Brief | Filed Answering Brief. Original Copy of Answering Brief. | 04-18181 | |
| 11/01/2004 | Brief | Filed Reply Brief. | 04-20032 | |
| 06/09/2005 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Submit on Briefs. Cause appearing, oral argument will not be scheduled and this appeal shall stand submitted for decision to the Northern Nevada Panel as of the date of this order on the briefs filed herein. | 05-11388 | |
| 06/09/2005 | Case Status Update | Submitted for Decision. NNP05-WM/MD/RP | ||
| 07/28/2005 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order of Affirmance. "ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED." NNP05-WM/MD/RP | 05-14993 | |
| 08/23/2005 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | 05-15066 | |
| 08/23/2005 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
| 09/08/2005 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on August 29, 2005. | 05-15066 | |