judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

BAILEY & DUTTON VS. JUSTUS

Case Information: 42744
Short Caption:BAILEY & DUTTON VS. JUSTUSCourt:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Washoe Co. - Second Judicial District - CV0304564Classification:Civil Appeal - General - Other
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:02/11/2004 / King, PatrickSP Status:Completed
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:How Submitted:

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
02/04/2004Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $250.00 from Law Offices of James Shields Beasley, Esq.--check no. 4499.
02/04/2004Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Settlement. Notice re: settlement conference program/suspension of rules mailed to all counsel. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) 04-02213
02/11/2004Settlement NoticeIssued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Patrick O. King. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts suspended pending further order of this court.)
02/19/2004Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement. 04-03257
02/25/2004Notice/Outgoing Letter. Patrick O. King. (docketing statement)
03/09/2004MotionFiled Motion for Stay. Appellants Bailey & Dutton, Bailey & McGah, Bailey, Inc., Dutton Enterprises, Ltd., S & V, Inc., and Pacheco Company, Inc.'s Motion to Stay the District Court's Order Granting a Corrective Notice Pending Appeal. 04-04459
03/09/2004MotionFiled Motion to Dismiss Appeal. 04-04494
03/10/2004Order/ProceduralFiled Order Denying Motion. Presently before the court is appellants' motion to stay the notice instruction. Four factors guide our consideration of a motion for a stay: (1) whether the object of the appeal will be defeated if the stay is denied; (2) whether appellants will suffer irreparable or serious injury if the stay is denied; (3) whether respondents will suffer irreparable or serious injury if the stay is granted; and (4) whether appellants are likely to prevail on the merits. We have considered these factors and have determined that they weigh against granting a stay. Accordingly, we deny the motion. [fn 2 We defer fuling on respondents' March 9, 2004 motion to dismiss, pending our receipt and consideration of any opposition to the motion.] 04-04548
03/19/2004MotionFiled Response to Motion. Appellants Bailey & Dutton, Bailey & McGah, Bailey, Inc., Dutton Enterprises, Ltd., S&V, Inc. and Pacheco Company, Inc.'s Opposition to Respondents Motion to Dismiss Appeal. 04-05285
03/19/2004Notice/IncomingFiled Proof of Service. (Opposition). 04-05286
03/29/2004MotionFiled Motion for Permission to File Document. Respondents' Motion for Leave to File a Reply. 04-05825
07/06/2004Settlement Program ReportFiled Interim Settlement Program Report. The Settlement Judge recommends this matter be removed from the Settlement Conference program. 04-12309
07/22/2004Settlement Order/Procedural Order Removing From Settlement Program/Briefing Reinstated. Pursuant to the written request of the settlement judge and good cause appearing, this appeal is removed from the settlement conference program. Briefing and the requesting of transcripts shall remain suspended, however, pending resolution of respondents' motion to dismiss this appeal. 04-13282
11/02/2004Order/DispositionalFiled Order Dismissing Appeal. Presently before the court is respondents' motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Appellants have filed an opposition. As this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal, we grant respondents' motion, and we "ORDER this appeal DISMISSED." fn4[Respondents' motion for leave to file a reply is denied as moot. Respondents' request for sanctions is denied. NNP04-NB/DA/MG 04-20204
11/30/2004RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 04-20502
11/30/2004Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
12/09/2004RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on December 1, 2004. 04-20502