| Date Docketed | Description | Filed By | Notes |
| 08/02/2021 | Notice of Appeal Filed | Daniel Manyari 1026037 | |
| 08/02/2021 | Misc. LT pleadings | | *Civil Cover Sheet |
| 08/02/2021 | Acknowledgment Letter | | |
| 08/02/2021 | ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal | | The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee required by the applicable rule of procedure and Section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes, is due and payable REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY. ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection. **NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status is filed. |
| 08/09/2021 | Case Filing Fee Paid Through Portal | | |
| 08/17/2021 | Notice of Appearance | Adrianna Christine De La Cruz-Muñoz 1024647 | |
| 08/20/2021 | Show Cause Lack of Prosecution, Initial Brief/Apdx | | ORDERED that appellant in the above-styled case is directed to show cause in writing, if any there be, on or before August 30, 2021, why the above-styled case should not be dismissed for lack of timely prosecution, in that appellant's initial brief and appendix have not been filed with this court as of this date, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(e). Failure to respond to this order will result in a sua sponte dismissal without further notice. If the initial brief and appendix are filed within this time, the order to show cause will be considered automatically discharged without further order. |
| 08/30/2021 | Notice of Appearance | Chad A. Barr 0055365 | |
| 08/30/2021 | Motion For Attorney's Fees | Chad A. Barr 0055365 | **RESPONSE FILED 9/14/21** |
| 08/30/2021 | Initial Brief on Merits | Chad A. Barr 0055365 | |
| 08/30/2021 | Appendix to Brief | Chad A. Barr 0055365 | |
| 09/14/2021 | Response | Adrianna Christine De La Cruz-Muñoz 1024647 | TO MOTION FOR ATTY. FEES. |
| 09/28/2021 | Stipulation for Substitution of Counsel | | |
| 09/28/2021 | Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief | Drew Krieger 117800 | |
| 09/28/2021 | ORD-Grant Substitution of Counsel | | ORDERED that pursuant to the stipulation for substitution of counsel filed September 28, 2021, the law firm of Gambrell & Russell, LLP is substituted for the law firm of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A. as counsel for appellee in the above-styled cause. |
| 09/28/2021 | Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief | | ORDERED that appellee's September 28, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellee shall serve the answer brief on or before November 29, 2021. In addition, appellee is notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein may foreclose appellee's right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal. |
| 06/22/2022 | Reversed - Per Curiam Opinion | | |
| 06/22/2022 | Order Granting Attorney Fees-Prevailing | | ORDERED that appellant’s August 30, 2021 motion for appellate fees is granted conditioned on the trial court determining that the moving party is the prevailing party. The request for costs in the motion is stricken as unauthorized. See Superior Prot., Inc. v. Martinez, 930 So. 2d 859, 860 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). |
| 07/08/2022 | Mandate | | |
| 07/08/2022 | West Publishing | | |