judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

LV DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT VS. PAPPAS

Case Information: 33812
Short Caption:LV DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT VS. PAPPASCourt:Supreme Court
Related Case(s): 33779 , 39255
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A327519Classification:Civil Appeal - General - Other
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:03/10/1999 / Robinson, DavidSP Status:Completed
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:How Submitted:

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
02/25/1999OtherDisqualification of Justice Young. Law firm of Lionel Sawyer & Collins.
02/25/1999Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Beckley Singleton Jemison Cobeaga & List, Chtd.--check no. 69471.
02/25/1999Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) 99-01285
03/10/1999OtherDisqualification of Justice Becker. Sat in district court proceedings.
03/10/1999OtherDisqualification of Justice Leavitt. Sat in district court proceedings.
03/10/1999Settlement NoticeIssued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: David K. Robinson. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts suspended pending further order of this court.)
03/12/1999Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement. (Mailed on: 3/10/99). 99-01799
04/16/1999Settlement Program ReportFiled Interim Settlement Program Report. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. 99-02969
04/16/1999Notice/IncomingFiled Proof of Service. Certificate of Service by Mail of Settlement Conference Report. 99-02970
04/26/1999Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Pursuant to NRAP 16(g), the settlement judge has filed a report indicating that the parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. Nevertheless, the time deadlines for requesting and preparing transcripts and briefing shall remain suspended pending a jurisdictional review of this appeal and further order of this court. 99-03278
04/29/1999Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Appellant shall have 15 days from the date of this order to comply with the provisions of NRAP 9(a) and 120 days to file and serve the opening brief and appendix. Thereafter, briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1). 99-03423
04/29/1999Notice/OutgoingIssued Letter. Letter to all counsel--Upon further review it has been determined that Justices Leavitt and Becker should not be disqualified from participation in this matter. 99-03440
05/17/1999Transcript RequestFiled Request for Transcript of Proceedings. 12/15/93; 02/16/94; 01/04/95;02/08/95; and 08/21/95 Proceedings: To Court Reporter: Mercer & Associates. 99-03993
05/17/1999Transcript RequestFiled Request for Transcript of Proceedings. 02/01/95 Proceedings: To Court Reporter: Janice Liston. 99-03994
05/17/1999Transcript RequestFiled Request for Transcript of Proceedings. 02/01/99 Proceedings: To Court Reporter: Free Lance Court Reporters. 99-03995
05/17/1999Transcript RequestFiled Request for Transcript of Proceedings. 09/09/96; 09/18/96; 10/27/97; 10/05/98; 11/16/98; and 12/11/98 Proceedings: To Court Reporter: Laurie Webb & Associates. 99-03996
08/16/1999MotionFiled Stipulation and Order. Brief due: September 27, 1999. 99-07593
09/07/1999MotionFiled Motion to Dismiss Appeal. Motion to Dismiss Appeal without Prejudice. 99-08379
09/20/1999MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. Motion for Order Extending Time to Respond to Respondents' Motion to Dismiss Appeal without Prejudice. 99-08899
09/20/1999MotionFiled Motion for Excess Pages. Motion for Leave to Exceed Page Limitation. 99-08901
09/29/1999MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. Motion for Order Extending Time to file Appellant's Opening Brief. 99-09335
09/29/1999MotionReceived Response to Motion. Appellant's Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Appeal or, in the Alternative, Motion to Treat Appeal as a Petition for Extraordinary Writ and Motion to Consolidate Current Appeal with Writ Petition in Case No. 33779. (Nos. 33779 and 33812). 99-09339
09/29/1999AppendixReceived Appendix. Special Appendix to Appellant's Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Appeal or, in the Alternative, Motion to Treat Appeal as a Petition for Extraordinary Writ and Motion to Consolidate Current Appeal with Writ Petition in Case No. 33779. (Nos. 33779 and 33812).
10/13/1999MotionFiled Response to Motion. Opposition to Motion for Order Extending time to file Appellant's Opening Brief. 99-09942
10/27/1999MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. Motion for Order Extending Time to File Appellant's Opening Brief. 99-10522
11/08/1999MotionFiled Response to Motion. Opposition to Motion for Order Extending Time to File Appellant's Opening Brief. 99-11003
11/22/1999Other Returned Unfiled Document. Returned, unfiled, with letter, Appellant's Response to Opposition to Motion for Order Extending Time to File Appellant's Opening Brief Filed on October 30, 1999. Pursuant to NRAP 27(a).
11/24/1999Notice/IncomingFiled Proof of Service. for Appellant's Appendix, Vols. 1 through 23. 99-11765
12/06/1999MotionFiled Motion for Permission to File Document. Proposed response attached to Motion for Leave to File Reply. 99-12199
12/20/1999MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. 99-12900
01/19/2000MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. 00-00870
02/03/2000MotionFiled Motion for Excess Pages. Motion for Leave to File an Over-Length Brief. 00-01749
03/02/2000MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. Motion for Extension of Time to File Fremont Street Experience Limited Liability Co's Reply Brief. 00-03303
03/08/2000MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. City of Las Vegas Downtown Redevelopment Agency. 00-03644
03/29/2000Order/DispositionalFiled Order Dismissing Appeal. We conclude that we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. Appellant has requested that in the event we conclude that a jurisdictional defect exists, its appeal be treated as a petition for extraordinary relief. We decline to do so. "ORDER this appeal dismissed." fn2[ It appears that the Freemont Street Experience Limited Liability Company is not a party to this appeal. We direct the clerk to strike the Freemont Street Experience limited Liability Company from the caption on this court's docket. We deny the Fremont Street Experience's March 2, 2000 motion to extend time to file a repoy brief and direct the clerk of this court to return, unfiled, the opening brief, appendix and reply brief received from the Fremont Street Experience on September 27, 1999, and March 21, 2000. As the Fremont Street Experience has been deleted as a respondent in this appeal, Justice Young is no longer disqualified from participating. We deny as moot the motions concerning briefing filed on September 20, 1999, September 29, 1999, October 27, 1999, December 6, 1999, December 20, 1999, January 19, 2000, February 3, 2000, and March 8, 2000. The clerk of this court shall return, unfiled, the proposed brief and appendix submitted on November 22, 1999, and the proposed brief submitted on February 3, 2000. We grant appellant's September 20, 1999 motion for an extension of time to respond to respondents' motion to dismiss and direct the clerk of this court to file appellant's response to the motion and the appendix, received on September 29, 1999.] NNP99B-CY/DA/ML 00-05092
03/29/2000MotionFiled Response to Motion. Appellant's Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Appeal or, in the Alternative, Motion to Treat Appeal as a Petition for Extraordinary Writ and Motion to Consolidate Current Appeal with Writ Petition in Case No. 33779 (nos. 33779/33812). 99-09339
03/29/2000AppendixFiled Appendix. Special Appendix to Appellant's Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Appeal or, in the Alternative, Motion to Treat Appeal as a Petition for Extraordinary Writ and Motion to Consolidate Current Appeal with Writ Petition in Case No. 33779.
03/29/2000Notice/OutgoingIssued Letter. Returned unfiled with letter to the Lionel firm: original and one copy of the Opening Brief and Appendix received 09/27/99 and the Reply Brief received 03/21/00.
03/29/2000Notice/OutgoingIssued Letter. Returned unfiled with letter to attorney Hall: original and one copy of the Answering Brief received 02/02/00.
03/29/2000Notice/OutgoingIssued Letter. Returned unfiled with letter to the Beckley firm: original and one copy of the opening brief and the Appellant's Appendix, Vols. 1 through 23 received 11/22/00.
04/18/2000MotionFiled Motion to Strike. Counsel's Motion to Strike or Correct Footnote 1 in "Order Dismissing Appeal". 00-06201
04/19/2000MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. 00-06265
04/21/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order. On March 29, 2000, we dismissed the appeal in docket no. 33812 for lack of jurisdiction. Accordingly, we deny as moot appellant's March 29, 2000, motion to consolidate the matters. Nos. 33779 and 33812. Document no. 00-06458.
04/25/2000Notice/IncomingFiled Proof of Service. service of Motion filed 4/19/00 to Crosby & Turner) (via fax - o.k. per A.H.). 00-06703
04/25/2000Order/Clerk'sFiled Clerk's Order Granting Motion. The motion filed April 19, 2000, is granted. Appellant shall have 5 days from the date of this order within which to file a petition for rehearing. 00-06705
04/26/2000Notice/IncomingFiled Proof of Service. Amended Certificate of Service (for Motion for Order Extending Time to File Appellant's Petition for Rehearing) (Original). 00-06749
04/28/2000MotionFiled Response to Motion. Opposition to Counsel's Motion to Strike or Correct Footnote 1 in "Order Dismissing Appeal." 00-06953
05/03/2000MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. (Second Request) 00-07220
05/08/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion. Appellant shall have 3 days from the date of this order to file and serve the petition for rehearing. 00-07521
05/09/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order Denying Motion. On April 18, 2000, appellant filed a motion to strike or correct footnote 1 in our order dismissing appeal. We deny appellant's motion. 00-07649
05/15/2000MotionFiled Motion for Excess Pages. Motion for Leave to File Petition in Excess of Ten Pages. 00-08025
05/15/2000Post-Judgment PetitionReceived Petition for Rehearing. Appellant's Petition for Rehearing of the March 29, 2000 Order Dismissing Appeal. 00-08029
05/15/2000AppendixReceived Appendix. Appendix to Appellant's Petition for Rehearing of the March 29, 2000 Order Dismissing Appeal 00-08032
05/15/2000Filing Fee Filing Fee due.
05/17/2000Order/Clerk'sFiled Clerk's Order. The motion filed May 15, 2000, is granted. The eleven-page petition for rehearing and the appendix provisionally submitted on May 15, 2000, shall be filed, forthwith. 00-08211
05/17/2000Post-Judgment PetitionFiled Petition for Rehearing. Appellant's Petition for Rehearing of the March 29, 2000 Order Dismissing Appeal. 00-08029
05/17/2000AppendixFiled Appendix. Appendix to Appellant's Petition for Rehearing of the March 29, 2000 Order Dismissing Appeal. 00-08032
06/22/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order. On May 17, 2000, appellant filed a petition for rehearing. To date, appellant has failed to submit the filing fee. Appellant shall have 10 days from the date of this order to submit the required filing fee. Failure to comply with this order may result in dismissal of this petition. 00-10718
06/29/2000Filing Fee Returned Filing Fee. $200 check returned to Beckley Singleton law firm with letter. Rehearing fee is $100.
07/03/2000Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $100 from Beckley Singleton Jemison Cobeaga & List--check no. 076473.
07/11/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Petition for Rehearing. Appellant argues that this court erred in concluding that the stipulation to dismiss a counterclaim against it by Ms. Adrienne LoBello, respondents' tenant, was ineffective. "We grant appellant's petition for rehearing with respect to the viability of this stipulation. We deny appellant's petition with respect its challenge concerning respondents' third, fourth, fifth and sixth counterclaims. These counterclaims remain pending and must be resolved prior to an appeal of the district court's order dismissing appellant's eminent domain complaint." NNP99B-CY/DA/ML 00-11792
08/08/2000RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 00-13776
08/08/2000Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
09/20/2000RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on September 1, 2000. 00-13776
08/10/2001MotionFiled Motion. (McDonough firm). 01-13614
10/25/2001Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion. for leave to withdraw from representation of appellant in this appeal, filed August 10, 2001. The clerk of this court shall remove the law firm of McDonough, Holland & Allen from the docket as counsel for appellant in this appeal. 01-17943