| Florida Fourth District Court of Appeal Docket |
| Case Docket |
| Case Number: 4D21-2292 |
| Final Criminal 3.850 Notice from Palm Beach County |
| CHARLES ABEL vs. STATE OF FLORIDA |
| Lower Tribunal Case(s):502015CF006456AXXXMB |
| | |
| Date Docketed | Description | Filed By | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/03/2021 | Notice of Appeal Filed | Charles Abel | |
| 08/03/2021 | Received Summary Record | ||
| 08/03/2021 | Notice of Appeal Filed | *Amended | |
| 08/03/2021 | Acknowledgment Letter | ||
| 08/03/2021 | Notice of Appeal treated as an Amended Appeal | ORDERED that the Notice of Appeal filed with the clerk of the lower tribunal on July 27, 2021 is treated as an amended Notice of Appeal in the above-styled case. | |
| 08/23/2021 | Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief | Charles Abel | |
| 08/23/2021 | Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief | ORDERED that appellant’s August 23, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant may serve the initial brief on or before October 22, 2021. | |
| 10/12/2021 | Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief | Charles Abel | |
| 10/13/2021 | Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief | ORDERED that appellant's October 12, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief on or before November 20, 2021. | |
| 11/22/2021 | Initial Brief on Merits | Charles Abel | |
| 01/13/2022 | Affirmed - Per Curiam Affirmed | ||
| 02/11/2022 | Mandate | ||
| 02/11/2022 | West Publishing | ||
| 03/01/2022 | Order Per Section 16(b)(10)b., Fla. Const. - Time Expired | Article I, section 16(b)(10)b. of the Florida Constitution provides that all state-level appeals and collateral attacks on any judgment must be complete within two years of the date of appeal in non-capital cases and five years from the date of appeal in capital cases unless a court enters an order with specific findings as to why the court was unable to comply and the circumstances causing the delay. Pursuant to the administrative procedures and definitions set forth in Supreme Court of Florida Administrative Order No. AOSC19-76, this case was not completed within the time frame required by Article I, section 16(b)(10)b. because the applicable time frame had already expired by the time this case was filed. Therefore, the Court is required to issue this order. The parties to this case are advised that no further action is necessary, and this case is completed and no further filings will be entertained. |
| |