| Case Information: 33972 | |||
| Short Caption: | WAL-MART STORES VS. WEIKLE | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Lower Court Case(s): | Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A385546 | Classification: | Civil Appeal - General - Other |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | 04/08/1999 / Berkson, Lester | SP Status: | Completed |
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | 11/07/2000 | How Submitted: | On Briefs |
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 03/31/1999 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Parker Nelson & Arin, Chtd.--check no. 3219. | ||
| 03/31/1999 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) | 99-02363 | |
| 04/08/1999 | Settlement Notice | Issued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Lester H. Berkson. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts suspended pending further order of this court.) | ||
| 05/03/1999 | Docketing Statement | Filed Docketing Statement. | 99-03509 | |
| 05/24/1999 | Motion | Filed Motion. Motion for Leave of the Supreme Court to Allow for a District Court Order Already Filed to be Held to be Properly a Nunc Pro Tunc Order or in the Alternative Motion for Leave of Court to Allow for the Refiling of that Order, from the District Court. | 99-04251 | |
| 05/25/1999 | Settlement Program Report | Filed Interim Settlement Program Report. The settlement conference is continued for further negotiations. | 99-04317 | |
| 06/07/1999 | Motion | Filed Response to Motion. Opposition to Motion for Leave of the Supreme Court to Allow for a District Court Order Already Filed to be Held to be Properly a Nunc Pro Tunc Order or in the Alternative Motion for Leave of Court to Allow for the Refiling of that Order, from the District Court. | 99-04713 | |
| 12/13/1999 | Settlement Program Report | Filed Interim Settlement Program Report. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. | 99-12510 | |
| 01/12/2000 | Settlement Order/Procedural | Filed Order: No Settlement/Briefing Reinstated. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this appeal. Appellant: 15 days to comply with NRAP 9(a); 120 days to file opening brief and appendix. Briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1). fn1[We defer ruling on respondent's motion filed May 24, 1999 and on respondent's opposition to that motion filed June 7, 1999]. | 00-00497 | |
| 01/27/2000 | Transcript Request | Filed Certificate of No Transcript Request. | 00-01359 | |
| 05/12/2000 | Brief | Filed Opening Brief. Mailed on: 5/10/00. | 00-07919 | |
| 05/12/2000 | Appendix | Filed Appendix to Opening Brief. | 00-07920 | |
| 06/05/2000 | Motion | Filed Stipulation and Order. Brief due: July 11, 2000. | 00-09399 | |
| 06/12/2000 | Other | Other. Received page 61A to Appellant's Appendix filed 5/12/00. Place in appendix in chronological order. | ||
| 07/10/2000 | Brief | Filed Answering Brief. Mailed on: 7/7/00. | 00-11710 | |
| 07/31/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. Order Denying Motion and Granting Limited Remand. The motion and opposition indicate that the trail court's failure to make findings and conclusions was not a mistake in writing or copying; rather, it appears it was the result of the court's failure to exercise its judicial function. The nunc pro tunc order cannot serve to remedy this judicial error. It is also evident from the motion and opposition that the district court has made its findings and conclusions and only lack jurisdiction to enter its order. This appeal shall be held in abeyance pending further order of this court, and we remand this matter to the district court for the limited purpose of entry of an amended judgment which includes findings of fact and conclusions of law. The district court shall have 30 days in which to enter such a judgment. Thereafter, appellant shall forthwith file an amended notice of appeal. Upon receipt of the amended notice of appeal, the clerk of this court shall file the amended notice under this docket number. | 00-13205 | |
| 09/01/2000 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Amended/Supplemental. | 00-15461 | |
| 09/11/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Briefing Reinstated. This appeal may now proceed, and the briefing schedule is hereby reinstated. Appellant shall have 30 days from the date of this order to file its reply brief, if any. | 00-15950 | |
| 09/29/2000 | Brief | Filed Reply Brief. Mailed on: 9/26/00. | 00-17225 | |
| 09/29/2000 | Appendix | Filed Appendix to Reply Brief. | 00-17226 | |
| 11/07/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. Oral argument will not be scheduled and this appeal shall stand submitted as of the date of this order, on the record and briefs filed herein. | 00-19584 | |
| 11/07/2000 | Case Status Update | Submitted for Decision. | ||
| 12/04/2000 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Dispositional Order/Appeal. We therefore conclude that the district court erred in striking the request for trial de novo. " . . . the order of the district court is reversed, and this matter is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this order." NNP00A-MS/DA/ML | 00-21107 | |
| 01/03/2001 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | 00-21235 | |
| 01/03/2001 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
| 02/20/2001 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on January 9, 2001. | 00-21235 | |