Case Information: 37044 | |||
Short Caption: | DAVENPORT VS. COMSTOCK HILLS-RENO | Court: | Supreme Court |
Lower Court Case(s): | Washoe Co. - Second Judicial District - CV9906706 | Classification: | Civil Appeal - General - Other |
Disqualifications: | Maupin | Case Status: | Case Closed |
Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
To SP/Judge: | 12/12/2000 / King, Patrick | SP Status: | Completed |
Oral Argument: | 04/08/2002 at 9:00 AM | Oral Argument Location: | Carson City |
Submission Date: | 04/08/2002 | How Submitted: | After Oral Argument |
+ Party Information |
Docket Entries | ||||
Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
11/21/2000 | Other | Disqualification of Justice Maupin. Law firm of Thorndal Armstrong Delk Balkenbush & Eisinger. | ||
11/21/2000 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Goedert & Michaels--check no. 8101. | ||
11/21/2000 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Settlement. Notice re: settlement conference program/suspension of rules mailed to all counsel. | 00-20466 | |
12/12/2000 | Settlement Notice | Issued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Patrick O. King. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts and docketing statement suspended pending further order of this court.) | ||
02/26/2001 | Settlement Order/Procedural | Filed Order: No Settlement/Briefing Reinstated. Pursuant to the written request of the settlement judg, this appeal is removed from the settlement conference program. Appellant shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, file the docketing statement. Upon the filing of the docketing statement, this court shall conduct a preliminary jurisdicitonal review of this appeal. Appellant: 15 days to comply with NRAP 9(a); 120 days to file and serve opening brief and appendix. Briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1). (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) | 01-03503 | |
03/06/2001 | Transcript Request | Filed Certificate of No Transcript Request. | 01-04053 | |
03/06/2001 | Docketing Statement | Filed Docketing Statement. | 01-04054 | |
06/27/2001 | Brief | Filed Opening Brief. Mailed on: No postmark. | 01-10841 | |
06/27/2001 | Appendix | Filed Joint Appendix. | 01-10842 | |
07/26/2001 | Brief | Filed Answering Brief. Mailed on: Hand delivered 07/26/01 (Reno/Carson). | 01-12687 | |
08/23/2001 | Brief | Filed Reply Brief. Mailed on: Hand delivered 08/23/01 (Reno/Carson). | 01-14322 | |
02/25/2002 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice Scheduling Oral Argument. Oral Argument is scheduled for 30 minutes on April 8, 2002, at 9:00 a.m. (NNP02-MS/RR/NB) | ||
03/26/2002 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Oral Argument Reminder Notice. | ||
04/08/2002 | Case Status Update | Submitted for Decision. Argued by: Warren w. Goedert for Appellant and Katherine F. Bobier for Respondents. NNP02-MS/RR/NB. | ||
05/17/2002 | Opinion/Dispositional | Filed Authored Opinion. "Reversed and remanded." Before Shearing, Rose and Becker, JJ. By the Court, Rose, J. I concur: Shearing, J. Becker, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. 118 Nev. Adv. Opn. No. 39. NNP02 | 02-08712 | |
05/31/2002 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee due. | ||
05/31/2002 | Post-Judgment Petition | Filed Petition for Rehearing. | 02-09575 | |
05/31/2002 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee. (Rehearing fee of $100). Due Date: 10 days | ||
06/05/2002 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $100 from from Thorndal Armstrong Delk Balkenbush & Eisinger--check no. 017302. | ||
07/10/2002 | Post-Judgment Order | Filed Order/Rehearing Denied. "Rehearing denied." NNP02-MS/RR/NB | 02-11769 | |
07/22/2002 | Post-Judgment Petition | Filed Petition for En Banc Reconsideration. (Respondent's) Mailed on: July 19, 2002. | 02-12518 | |
07/25/2002 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | 02-12725 | |
07/25/2002 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
08/08/2002 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on July 26, 2002. | 02-12725 | |
09/05/2002 | Post-Judgment Order | Filed Order Denying En Banc Reconsideration. Having considered the petition on file herein, we have concluded that en banc reconsideration is not warranted. NRAP 40A. Accordingly, we "ORDER the petition DENIED." fn1[The Honorable A. William Maupin, Chief Justice, voluntarily recused himself from participation in the decision of this matter.] EN BANC | 02-15312 |