| Case Information: 33269 | |||
| Short Caption: | PRINT CONSULTANTS VS. WATERPUR INTERNATIONAL | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Lower Court Case(s): | Washoe Co. - Second Judicial District - CV9607158 | Classification: | Civil Appeal - General - Other |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Disposition Filed/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | 11/10/1998 / Berry, Robert | SP Status: | Completed |
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | How Submitted: | ||
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 11/04/1998 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Michael J. Morrison-check no. 10696. | ||
| 11/04/1998 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant) | ||
| 11/05/1998 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 for cross-appeal from Skinner firm-check no. 11166. | ||
| 11/05/1998 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Cross-Appeal. (docketing statement mailed to counsel for cross-appellant). | ||
| 11/10/1998 | Settlement Notice | Issued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Robert G. Berry . (Briefing and preparation of transcripts and docketing statement suspended pending further order of this court.) | ||
| 11/20/1998 | Docketing Statement | Filed Docketing Statement. of Appellant/Cross-Respondent. | ||
| 12/04/1998 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Show Cause. The cross-appellant shall, within 10 days of the date of this order, file and serve the docketing statement or show cause why sanctions should no be imposed against counsel. Response due: 10 days. | ||
| 12/14/1998 | Docketing Statement | Filed Docketing Statement. (cross-appeal). | ||
| 02/04/1999 | Motion | Filed Motion to Dismiss Appeal. Conditional Motion to Dismiss (Appellant-Cross-Respondent Print Consultants). (Mailed on: 2/3/99). | ||
| 02/09/1999 | Settlement Program Report | Filed Interim Settlement Program Report. Determination of a failure to participate in good faith in the settlement conference process (report attached). | ||
| 02/16/1999 | Letter/Incoming | Filed Letter. Settlement Judge Berry re: supplemental report recommending sanctions. | ||
| 04/01/1999 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Show Cause. WaterPur shall, within 15 days from the date of this order, show cause why this court should not act upon settlement judge's determination and recommendation. We defer ruling on appellant/cross-respondent's conditional motion to dismiss its own appeal . Response due: 15 days. | ||
| 04/16/1999 | Motion | Filed Response to Order to Show Cause. | ||
| 04/23/1999 | Motion | Received Reply to Response. Returned unfiled 12/20/99. | ||
| 12/20/1999 | Order/Counsel | Filed Order/Sanctions. We conclude that Respondent/Cross-Appellant WaterPur, and specifically Amyn Dahya, failed to participate in good faith in the settlement conference. We conclude that the imposition of sanctions against Mr. Amyn Dahya is appropriate. Mr. Dahya shall personally pay Print Consultants $1,500.00 for costs incurred by Print Consultants in attending the scheduled settlement conference. In addition, Mr Dahya shall pay $1,000.00 to the Supreme Court Law Library. WaterPur shall separately file with this court, within 30 days from the date of this order, proof of payments of the sanctions. Failure to timely comply with this order will likely result in the imposition of additional sanctions, including dismissal of WaterPur's cross-appeal. We deny WaterPur's request for an additional settlement conference. We defer ruling on Print Consultants' conditional motion to dismiss its own appeal and direct the clerk to return, unfiled, Print Consultants' "Reply to Response to the Order to Show Cause" received on April 23, 1999. This appeal shall forthwith proceed as no settlement has been reached. Appellant/Cross-Respondent shall have 15 days from the date of this order to comply with NRAP 9(a) and 120 days to file and serve the opening brief. Briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31 (a)(1). | ||
| 12/20/1999 | Other | Other. Returned, unfiled, with letter to the Skinner firm: Original Reply to Response to Order to Show Cause. | ||
| 03/31/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Case Processing Order. To date, WaterPur has failed to file proof of payment of the santions in accordance with this court's December 20, 1999 order. Accordingly, cause appearing, we dismiss WaterPur's cross-appeal. | 00-05183 | |
| 12/04/2000 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Voluntary Dismissal. We grant appellant's unopposed conditional motion to dismiss. "We hereby dismiss this appeal." We vacate that portion of our December 20, 1999, order directing appellant to comply with NRAP 9(a) and to file an opening brief and appendix. SNP00A-RR/CY/NB | 00-21098 | |
| 12/04/2000 | Case Status Update | Case Closed. No remittitur issued. | ||