judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

MAKI VS. CHONG

Case Information: 39041
Short Caption:MAKI VS. CHONGCourt:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):White Pine Co. - Seventh Judicial District - CV9504089Classification:Civil Appeal - Family Law - Proper Person
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:04/10/2002How Submitted:On Record

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
01/08/2002Filing Fee Filing Fee Waived.
01/08/2002Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. 02-00430
01/16/2002Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Transmit Record and Directing Response. Original record due: 30 days. fn3[The record shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court.] 02-01091
04/10/2002Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Transmit Record and Directing Response. On January 16, 2002, we directed the district court clerk to transmit the original trial court record to this court. To date, we have not received the record. Accordingly, within 20 days from the date of this order the district court clerk shall transmit to this court the original trial court record pertaining to this appeal. fn3--[The record shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court.] 02-06390
04/10/2002Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Copy. 02-06411
04/10/2002Case Status Update Submitted for Decision.
02/24/2003Order/ProceduralFiled Order Denying Motion. Order Denying Stay. Appellant has submitted a proper person motion for a stay of the district court's order. fn1[We grant appellant's request under NRAP 46(b) to appear in proper person for the purpose of filing the motion for stay, and direct the clerk of this court to file the motion received from appellant on October 31, 2002.] In determining whether to grant a stay pending appeal, this court considers four factors. Appellant has not demonstrated that these factors militate in favor of a stay. Accordingly, we deny appellant's motion. 03-02984
02/24/2003MotionFiled Proper Person Motion. Request for Permission to Submit Pursuant to N.R.A.P. 46(b): Motion to Stay Execution of Judgment Pending Appeal. 02-18798
05/29/2003Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Directing Response. After reviewing the record on appeal, it appears our reversal of the district court's order may be warranted. Chong shall have 30 days from this order's date to file a response, including authorities, explaining why the district court's order should not be reversed. 03-09005
06/30/2003MotionFiled Response to Order to Show Cause. 03-11006
08/29/2003Opinion/DispositionalFiled Per Curiam Opinion. "Reversed and remanded with instructions." Before Rose, Maupin and Gibbons, JJ. Author: Per Curiam. 119 Nev. Adv. Opn. No. 46. NNP03. 03-14558
09/23/2003RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 03-14579
09/23/2003Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
10/20/2003RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on October 10, 2003. 03-14579