| Case Information: 31980 | |||
| Short Caption: | DEUTSCH (SCOTT) VS. WARDEN | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Lower Court Case(s): | Washoe Co. - Second Judicial District - CR95P1441 | Classification: | Criminal Appeal - Other - Post-Conviction |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | 11/06/1998 | How Submitted: | |
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 03/17/1998 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee Waived. | ||
| 03/17/1998 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant). | ||
| 04/01/1998 | Docketing Statement | Filed Docketing Statement. | ||
| 04/14/1998 | Other | Returned Unfiled Document. (not a fast track appeal). | ||
| 07/21/1998 | Motion | Filed Motion to Extend Time. | ||
| 07/21/1998 | Brief | Received Opening Brief. Mailed on: Reno/Carson Messenger 7/21/98-two copies returned). | ||
| 07/21/1998 | Appendix | Received Appendix to Opening Brief. Mailed on: Reno/Carson Messenger 7/21/98-three copies returned. | ||
| 07/23/1998 | Order/Clerk's | Filed Clerk's Order Granting Motion. The opening brief and appendix provisionally submitted on July 21, 1998, shall be filed, forthwith. | ||
| 07/23/1998 | Brief | Filed Opening Brief. | ||
| 07/23/1998 | Appendix | Filed Appendix to Opening Brief. | ||
| 08/25/1998 | Motion | Filed Stipulation and Order. Brief due: September 24, 1998. | ||
| 09/15/1998 | Brief | Filed Answering Brief. Mailed on: 9/14/98. | ||
| 11/06/1998 | Case Status Update | Submitted for Decision. | ||
| 05/03/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. To date, neither the appellant nor respondent has submitted a copy of the transcript of the evidentiary hearing conducted by the district court on June 7, 1997, and August 1, 1997, as required by NRAP 10(b). Both parties reply on and cite to this transcript in their briefs. Therefore, appellant shall, within 20 days of the date of this order, file a supplemental appendix including the evidentiary hearing transcript. | ||
| 05/18/2000 | Appendix | Filed Appendix. Supplemental Appendix to Appellant's Opening Brief. | ||
| 01/05/2001 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order of Affirmance. We order counsel for appellant to show, within 20 days, why sanctions for his flagrant disregard of the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure should not be imposed. Having considered appellant's contention, " . . . we affirm the district court order denying appellant's petition for a writ of habeas corpus." NNP00A-MS/DA/ML | 01-00273 | |
| 01/31/2001 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | 01-00649 | |
| 01/31/2001 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
| 01/31/2001 | Motion | Filed Response to Order to Show Cause. | 01-02111 | |
| 02/20/2001 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on February 1, 2001. | 01-00649 | |
| 03/07/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. On January 5, 2001, this court directed counsel for appellant to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed for counsel's failure to adhere to the nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure. Counsel has now responded to this court's order. In light of counsel's explanation, we decline to impose sanctions at this time. In the future this court expects counsel to pursue his obligations " in a manner meeting high standards of diligence, professionalism, and competence." | 01-04111 | |