| Case Information: 38985 | |||
| Short Caption: | WYGNANSKI (DANIEL) VS. STATE | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Lower Court Case(s): | Washoe Co. - Second Judicial District - CR00P0902 | Classification: | Criminal Appeal - Fast Track - Post-Conviction |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | How Submitted: | ||
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 12/26/2001 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee Waived. | ||
| 12/26/2001 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Fast Track. Fast track appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Fast Track Notice mailed to all counsel.) | 01-21694 | |
| 01/25/2002 | Fast Track Brief | Filed Fast Track Statement. | 02-01763 | |
| 01/25/2002 | Appendix | Filed Joint Appendix. | 02-01764 | |
| 02/07/2002 | Transcript | Filed Rough Draft Transcript of Proceedings. Proceedings: October 31, 2001. Court Reporter: Gail West-Willsey. | 02-02503 | |
| 02/21/2002 | Fast Track Brief | Filed Fast Track Response. | 02-03300 | |
| 03/14/2002 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order of Affirmance. For the reasons stated in the attached order of the district court, we "ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED." fn3[We have considered all proper person documents filed or received in this matter, and we conclude that the relief requested is not warranted.] SNP02-CY/DA/ML | 02-04605 | |
| 04/09/2002 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | 02-04880 | |
| 04/09/2002 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
| 04/15/2002 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on April 11, 2002. | 02-04880 | |
| 02/05/2003 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. On March 14, 2002, this court affirmed the district court's order, and on April 9, 2002, the remittitur issued. On March 26, 2002, this court received a proper person document. Although appellant has not been granted leave to file documents in proper person, this court has considered the proper person document received and concluded that the relief requested is not warranted. | 03-01929 | |