judyrecords
search tips
750 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

RECKTENWALD (PAUL) VS. STATE

Case Information: 35529
Short Caption:RECKTENWALD (PAUL) VS. STATECourt:Supreme Court
Related Case(s): 32103 , 36659
Lower Court Case(s):Nye Co. - Fifth Judicial District - CR2578Classification:Civil Appeal - Family Law - Proper Person
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:11/07/2000How Submitted:On Record

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
01/24/2000Filing Fee Filing Fee Waived. 04/12/00--Per AH, this has been redesignated as a civil matter, and a notice to pay the filing fee has been issued.
01/24/2000Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. 00-01075
02/17/2000Letter/IncomingReceived Proper Person Letter. Regarding copy work of Petitioner's documents 00-02517
04/12/2000Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee. Due Date: 10 days
05/23/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order Denying Motion. This is a proper perosn appeal from an order denying appellant's request for exoneration of the premium he paid for his bail bond. We deny without prejudice appellant's motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Appellant must first seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court. Appellant is cautioned that his failure to promptly and properly seek leave to proceed informa pauperis or to pay the filing fee may result in the immediate dismissal of his appeal. 00-08618
06/21/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order. The appeal was originally designated as a criminal matter, so that no filing fee pursuant to NRS 2.250 was due. Upon further review, it was determined that this appeal concerned a bail bond issue, which is a civil matter. On April 12, 2000, this court issued a notice to appellant to pay the filing fee. On June 1, 2000, appellant submitted a copy of an appliction to the district curt, file on December 29, 1999. We direct the district court to enter an order in compliance with NRAP 24 within 30 days from the date of this order, and to provide a copy of the order to this court. fn2[Although appellant was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, we have considered the proper person documents received from appellant.] 00-10634
09/18/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order. To date, the district court has not complied with this court's order of June 21, 2000. We therefore again direct the district court to enter an order in compliance with NRAP 24 within 30 days from the date of this order, and to provide a copy of the order to this court. fn1[Although appellant was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, we have considered the proper person documents received from appellant.] 00-16354
09/28/2000Order/IncomingFiled District Court Order. Certified copy of Order Granting Petitioner's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis filed in district court on September 26, 2000. 00-17167
10/09/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Transmit Record and Directing Response. Original record due: 30 days. fn1[The record shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court.] 00-17803
11/07/2000Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal Copy. Volumes 1 through 9. 00-19575
11/07/2000Case Status Update Submitted for Decision.
07/20/2001Notice/OutgoingIssued Letter. to appellant Paul Recktenwald in response to letter dated July 12, 2001.
05/10/2002Order/DispositionalFiled Order of Affirmance. "ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED." fn1[Although appellant was not granted leave to file documents in proper person, see NRAP 46(b), we have received and considered appellant's proper person documents.] NNP02-MS/RR/NB 02-08187
06/04/2002RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 02-08337
06/04/2002Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
06/12/2002RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on June 6, 2002. 02-08337