judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

SOUTHWORTH VS. DISTRICT COURT

Case Information: 35419
Short Caption:SOUTHWORTH VS. DISTRICT COURTCourt:Supreme Court
Related Case(s): 34427
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A394245Classification:Original Proceeding - Civil - Prohibition
Disqualifications:Case Status:Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:How Submitted:

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
12/30/1999Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Barker Brown Busby Crisman & Thomas--check no. 2013.
12/30/1999Petition/WritFiled Petition for Writ of Prohibition. 99-13418
12/30/1999MotionFiled Motion for Stay. 99-13420
12/30/1999Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice of Procedural Deficiency. Affidavit of party beneficially interested. Due Date: 10 days 99-13451
01/10/2000Petition/WritFiled Petition for Writ. Verification of Petitioner. 00-00394
01/10/2000MotionFiled Response to Motion. Statement of No Opposition to Motion for Stay. 00-00395
01/21/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Answer Writ Petition. Answer due from the real party in interest: 20 days from the date of this order. 00-00978
01/21/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Order Granting Stay. The proceedings in District Court Case No. A394245 are hereby stayed until further order of this court. 00-01024
02/10/2000Petition/WritFiled Answer to Petition for Writ. Sherry Feibish's Response to Petitioner's Stephen Southworth's Petition for Writ of Prohibition. 00-02113
03/10/2000Order/DispositionalFiled Order Denying Petition. " . . . we deny the petition." fn1[We disapprove of the district court's decision in this case to permit the real party in interest to file an amended complaint, rather than extending the time for service under NRCP 6(b). We construe that order as one extending the time for service, and conclude that the district court did not manifestly abuse its discretion in entering it. In light of this order, we vacate the stay of proceedings entered on January 21, 2000.] SNP99B-WM/MS/NB 00-03773
04/05/2000RemittiturIssued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur. 00-05467
04/05/2000Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.