| Docket Entries |
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 01/04/2000 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee Waived. | | |
| 01/04/2000 | Order/Incoming | Filed Order Certifying Question to Nevada Supreme Court. Received from U.S. District Court, Reno, for the District of Nevada. | | 00-00077
|
| 03/03/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. fn1[The clerk shall amend the caption in this matter to conform to the caption appearing in this order.] Appellant (petitioner) shall have 30 days from the date of this order to file and serve an opening brief and appendix. Thereafter, briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1). | | 00-03429
|
| 03/06/2000 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Notice. Copy of Telephonic Status Hearing submitted by U.S. District Court Clerk. | | 00-03456
|
| 03/31/2000 | Motion | Filed Motion to Extend Time. Motion for Order Extending or Suspending Time in which to File Opening Brief. | | 00-05220
|
| 04/03/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. We hereby suspend the briefing schedule in this matter pending further order of this court. Petitioner Little shall, within 30 days from the date of this order, provide this court with a copy of the order of the United States District Court ruling on his request to recall certification and file a written report informing this court of the status of this matter. | | 00-05349
|
| 04/20/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. We deny as moot petitioner's March 31, 2000, motion to extend or suspend the briefing schedule. The motion is moot as we suspended the briefing schedule in this matter in an order entered on April 3, 2000, pursuant to a request by the honorable David W. Hagen, United States District Judge. Judge Hagen made the request by way of letter, requesting the suspension pending his ruling on petitioner's motion to withdraw the certification request. | | 00-06368
|
| 05/03/2000 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Notice. Petitioner's Status Report pursuant to this Court's Order Dated April 3, 2000. | | 00-07208
|
| 06/01/2000 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Notice. Copy of Minutes of U.S. District Court filed May 31, 2000. | | 00-09236
|
| 06/22/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. On April 3, 2000, we suspended briefing in this matter pending resolution of petitioner's motion in federal district court to withdraw the certification request. On June 1, 2000, this court received notice that the federal district court denied petitioner's motion. Petitioner shall have 30 days from the date of this order to file and serve an opening brief and appendix. Thereafter, briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1). | | 00-10684
|
| 07/24/2000 | Brief | Filed Opening Brief. Mailed on: 7/21/00. | | 00-12743
|
| 08/25/2000 | Brief | Filed Answering Brief. Mailed on: LV Drop Box 8/23/00. | | 00-14968
|
| 08/25/2000 | Appendix | Filed Appendix to Answering Brief. Respondents' Appendix of Related Court Appeals. | | 00-14969
|
| 08/25/2000 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Proof of Service. Amended Certificate of Service for Respondent's Answering Brief and Respondents' Appendix of Related Court Records. | | 00-14970
|
| 09/25/2000 | Brief | Filed Reply Brief. Mailed on: 9/22/00. | | 00-16890
|
| 09/26/2000 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Certificate of Compliance. To Appellant's Reply Brief. | | 00-16989
|
| 10/26/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. Oral argument will not be scheduled and this appeal shall stand submitted as of the date of this order, on the record and briefs filed herein. | | 00-18981
|
| 10/26/2000 | Case Status Update | Submitted for Decision. | | |
| 11/03/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. On October 13, 2000, petitioner submitted, in proper person, a motion for leave to file a supplemental brief and submitted the proposed supplemental brief. fn1[Although appellant has not been granted leave to file papers in proper person, we have received and considered appellant's proper person motion.] On October 25, 2000, respondent submitted an opposition to petitioner's motion. In the interest of judicial economy, we direct the clerk of this court to file respondent's opposition. We note that petitioner is represented by John C. Lambrose of the Federal Public Defender's Office who filed the opening brief and the reply brief on petitioner's behalf in this matter. We deny petitioner's motion to file a proper person supplemental brief. The clerk of this court shall return, unfiled, the proper person supplemental brief provisionally received on October 13, 2000. If petitioner's counsel believes supplemental briefing is appropriate, counsel may file a motion for leave to file a supplemental brief prepared by counsel. | | 00-19304
|
| 11/03/2000 | Motion | Filed Response to Motion. Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Proper Person Supplemental Brief by Represented Party. | | 00-18919
|
| 11/03/2000 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Letter. to petitioner Christopher Little: returned unfiled, the original proper person Petitioner's Supplemental Opening Brief received on October 13, 2000. | | |
| 11/13/2000 | Motion | Filed Motion. Request for Oral Argument. | | 00-19847
|
| 10/10/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. On November 3, 2000, this court entered an order in which we declined to grant appellant permission to file a supplemental brief in proper person and directed the clerk of this court to return, unfiled, the supplemental brief submitted on October 13, 2000. On October 25, 2000, respondent submitted an opposition to appellant's motion. After the order resolving the motion was entered, appellant submitted, in proper person, a document entitled, "Petitioner's Rebuttal to Opposition to Motion for Leave to file Proper Person Supplemental Brief." In light our November 3, 2000, order, we direct the clerk of this court to return, unfiled, the proper person rebuttal received on November 8, 2000. | | 01-17040
|
| 10/10/2001 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Letter. to petitioner Christopher Little. Returned unfiled, the original proper person Petitioner's Rebuttal to Opposition to Motion for Leave to file Proper Person Supplemental Brief, received November 8, 2000. | | |
| 11/15/2001 | Opinion/Dispositional | Filed Per Curiam Opinion. "Question answered." fn39[We have considered all proper person documents filed or received in this matter, and we conclude that the relief requested is not warranted. We have also considered Little's motion requesting oral argument, filed November 13, 2000, and conclude that oral argument is not necessary for our resolution of this case.] Before the En Banc Court. Per Curiam. 117 Nev. Adv. Opn. No. 69. En Banc | | 01-19039
|
| 12/12/2001 | Remittitur | Issued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur. | | 01-19644
|
| 12/12/2001 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | | |