judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

FRANCHISE TAX BD OF CALIFORNIA VS. DIST. CT. C/W 36390

Case Information: 35549
Short Caption:FRANCHISE TAX BD OF CALIFORNIA VS. DIST. CT. C/W 36390Court:Supreme Court
Consolidated:35549*, 36390 Related Case(s): 36390 , 39274 , 39312 , 47141, 53264 , 80884
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A382999Classification:Original Proceeding - Civil - Mandamus/Prohibition
Disqualifications:BeckerCase Status:Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: En Banc
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:02/09/2001 at 8:30 AMOral Argument Location:Carson City
Submission Date:02/09/2001How Submitted:After Oral Argument

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
01/27/2000Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from McDonald Carano Wilson McCune Bergin Frankovich & Hicks--check no. 05977.
01/27/2000Petition/WritFiled Petition for Writ of Mandamus or Prohibition. Franchise Tax Board of the State of California's Petition for Writ of Mandamus, or in the Alternative, for Writ of Prohibition. (Exhibits have been detached and sealed.) 00-01395
04/13/2000MotionFiled Motion for Stay. Franchise Tax Board of the State of California's Motion for Stay Pending Adjudiciation of Petition for Writ of Mandamus, or in the Alternative, for Writ of Prohibition. (Exhibits have been detached and sealed.) 00-05936
04/18/2000MotionFiled Response to Motion. Gilbert P. Hyatt's Opposition to the FTB's Motion for Stay Pending Adjudication of Petition for Writ of Mandamus, or in the Alternative, for Writ of Prohibition. (Exhibits have been detached and sealed.) 00-06203
04/18/2000Notice/IncomingFiled Proof of Service. Receipt of Copy. 00-06204
04/21/2000OtherDisqualification of Justice Becker.
06/07/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Answer Writ Petition. Order Directing Answer, Temporarily Staying District Court Proceedings and Directing Clarification of Documents. The real party in interest, on behalf of respondents, shall have 30 days from the date of this order to file an answer. We conclude that a temporary stay is warranted and therefore grant petitioner's motion for stay, filed on April 13, 2000. The district court's orders imposing a protective order and compelling petitioner to release certain documents, as well as the proceedings in District Court Case No. A382999, are hereby stayed pending our receipt and consideration of the real party in interest's answer. Petitoner is directed to provide unredacted copies of documents FTB 100139, FTB 100218 and FTB 100401 (in a sealed envelope, with a description on the outside of the envelope describing the documents contained therein), and indicate which portions of these documents it contends should be protected from discovery pursuant to the attorney-client privilege. 00-09604
06/15/2000MotionFiled Motion. Gilbert P. Hyatt's Motion for Clarification of Stay Order of June 7, 2000. 00-10171
06/21/2000MotionFiled Response to Order to Show Cause. Franchise Tax Board of the State of California's Response to the Supreme Court's Order Dated June 7, 2000 (Franchise Tax Board of the State of California's Unredacted Documents - FTB 100139, FTB 100218, FTB 100401. - IN SEALED ENVELOPE). 00-10630
06/23/2000MotionFiled Response to Motion. Franchise Tax Board of the State of California's Opposition to Motion for Clarification of Stay Order of June 7, 2000. (IN SEALED ENVELOPE.) 00-10778
07/03/2000MotionFiled Motion. Motion for Leave to file Reply in Support of Motion for Clarification of Stay Order of June 7, 2000. 00-11349
07/03/2000Other Other. Received Proposed Reply in Support of Motion for Clarification of Stay Order of June 7, 2000. RETURNED UNFILED 09/13/00. 00-11350
07/07/2000MotionFiled Motion to Consolidate. (nos. 35549/36390). 00-11576
07/10/2000Petition/WritFiled Answer to Petition for Writ. Real Party in Interest Gilbert P. Hyatt's Answer to the FTB's Petition for a Writ of Mandamus, or in the alternative, for a writ of Prohibition (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION TO BE FILED UNDER SEAL). 00-11684
07/10/2000Notice/IncomingFiled Notice. Index to Appendix of Exhibits (Vols. I through IX) filed with the Supreme Court in Support of Real Party in Interest Gilbert P. Hyatt's Answer to the FTB's Petition for a Writ of Mandamus, or in the Alternative, for Writ of Prohibition (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION TO BE FILED UNDER SEAL). Note: This document is a copy of the index for Vols. I through IX of the Appendix to the Petition and is being submitted as a separate document--the Appendix also contains an Index in each volume. 00-11692
07/10/2000AppendixFiled Appendix. Appendix of Exhibits (Vols. I through IX) filed with the Supreme Court in Support of Real Party in Interest Gilbert P. Hyatt's Answer to the FTB's Petition for a Writ of Mandamus, or in the Alternative, for Writ of Prohibition (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION TO BE FILED UNDER SEAL). 00-11699
07/14/2000MotionFiled Response to Motion. Real Party in Interest Gilbert P. Hyatt's Opposition to Motion to Consolidate Writ (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION TO BE FILED UNDER SEAL). 00-12179
08/08/2000MotionFiled Motion for Permission to File Document. Franchise Tax Board of the State of California's Request to file Reply in Support of its Motion to Consolidate Petitions for Writ of Mandamus, or in the Alternative, Writ of Prohibition. (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION FILED UNDER SEAL). (Nos. 35549 and 36390). 00-13793
08/08/2000MotionFiled Motion for Permission to File Document. Franchise Tax Board of the State of California's Request to file Reply in Support of its Petition for Writ of Mandamus, or in the Alternative, Writ of Prohibition. (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION FILED UNDER SEAL). 00-13795
08/08/2000MotionReceived Reply to Response. Franchise Tax Board of the State of California's Reply in Support of its Petition for Writ of Mandamus, or in the Alternative, Writ of Prohibition. (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION FILED UNDER SEAL). 00-13796
08/08/2000AppendixReceived Appendix. Appendix of Exhibits to Franchise Tax Board of the State of California's Reply in Support of its Petition for Writ of Mandamus, or in the Alternative, Writ of Prohibition. (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION FILED UNDER SEAL). 00-13797
08/09/2000Notice/IncomingFiled Affidavit. Affidavit of Mailing. 00-13856
08/21/2000MotionFiled Response to Motion. Real Party in Interest Gilbert P. Hyatt's Opposition to FTB's Request to File Reply in Support of Motion to Consolidate and Motion to Strike Proposed Reply (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION TO BE FILED UNDER SEAL). 00-14648
08/21/2000MotionFiled Motion to Strike. Real Party in Interest Gilbert P. Hyatt's Motion to Strike Proposed Reply or, in the Alternative, Opposition to FTB's Request to File Reply in Support of Writ (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION TO BE FILED UNDER SEAL). 00-14652
09/13/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Order Consolidating Petitions in Docket Nos. 35549 and 36390, Directing an Answer in Docket No. 36390 and Clarifying Order Granting Temporary Stay in Docket No. 35549. On July 7, 2000, petitioner filed a motion to consolidate. We hereby consolidate docket No. 35549 and docket No. 36390 for disposition. fn1[In light of our order consolidating, we deny as moot petitioner's August 8, 2000, request to file a reply in support of its motion to consolidate these two petitions. We grant petitioner's request to file a reply in support of its petition for writ of mandamus or prohibition in Docket No. 35549. The clerk shall file the reply and appendix provisionally received on August 8, 2000. We deny the real party in interest's motions to strike proposed replies filed on August 21, 2000.] The real party in interest, on behalf of respondents, shall have 30 days from the date of this order to file an answer in Docket No. 36290. On June 15, 2000, the real party in interest filed a motion for clarification of our June 7, 2000, stay order entered in Docket No. 35549. fn2[In light of our order, we deny as moot the real party in interest's request to file a reply in support of its motion for clarification.] In our June 7, 2000, order we temporarily stayed the district court's orders imposing a protective order and compelling petitioner to release certain documents, as well as the proceedings in District Court Case No. A382999. Our June 7, 2000, order was intended to stay all proceedings in the district court. The stay of the district court proceedings will remain in effect until further order of this court. Nos. 35549, 36390. 00-16084
09/13/2000MotionFiled Reply to Response. Franchise Tax Board of the State of California's Reply in Support of its Petition for Writ of Mandamus, or in the Alternative, Writ of Prohibition. (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION FILED UNDER SEAL). Nos. 35549, 36390. 00-13796
09/13/2000AppendixFiled Appendix. Appendix of Exhibits to Franchise Tax Board of the State of California's Reply in Support of its Petition for Writ of Mandamus, or in the Alternative, Writ of Prohibition. (CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION FILED UNDER SEAL). Nos. 35549, 36390. 00-13797
09/13/2000Notice/OutgoingIssued Letter. to attorney Mark A. Hutchison: returned unfiled, original Proposed Reply in Support of Motion for Clarification of Stay Order of June 7, 2000, received July 3, 2000.
09/13/2000Notice/OutgoingIssued Letter. to attorney Thomas R. C. Wilson: returned unfiled, original and two copies of Franchise Tax Board of the State of California's Repy in Support of its Motion to Consolidate Petitions for Writ of Mandamus, or in the Alternative, Writ of Prohibition. (Confidential Informantion filed Under Seal.) Nos. 35549, 36390.
10/17/2000Petition/WritFiled Answer to Petition for Writ. Real Party in Interest Gilbert P. Hyatt's Answer to the FTB's Petition for Writ of Mandamus Ordering Dismissal, or Alternatively for a Writ of Prohibition and Mandamus Limiting the Scope of the Case (filed in no. 36390 --- nos. 35549/36390). CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION FILED UNDER SEAL.
10/17/2000ExhibitFiled Exhibits (copies). Exhibits to Answer: Volume X - Exhibits 28 and 29; Volume XI - Exhibits 30-32; Volume XII - Exhibits 33-37; Exhibits XIII - 38-48; and Volume XIV Exhibit 49 (filed in no. 36390 --- nos. 35549/36390). CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION FILED UNDER SEAL.
12/20/2000Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice Scheduling Oral Argument. Oral Argument is scheduled for 30 minutes in Carson City on February 9, 2001 at 8:30 a.m. (Nos. 35549 and 36390) (En Banc)
12/26/2000MotionFiled Motion. Franchise Tax Board of the State of California's Request to File a Reply in Support of its Petition for a Writ of Mandamus Ordering Dismissal, or Alternatively for a Writ of Prohibition and Mandamus Limiting the Scope of this Case. Nos. 35549/36390 00-22491
12/26/2000Other Other. Received Franchise Tax Board of the State of California's Reply in Support of its Petition for a Writ of Mandamus Ordering Dismissal, or Alternatively for a Writ of Prohibition and Mandamus Limiting the Scope of this Case--"Confidential Information Filed under Seal." Nos. 35549/36390 00-22492
12/26/2000Other Other. Received Appendix of Exhibits to Franchise Tax Board of the State of California's Reply in Support of its Petition for a Writ of Mandamus Ordering Dismissal, or Alternatively for a Writ of Prohibition and Mandamus Limiting the Scope of this Case--"Confidential Information Filed under Seal." Nos. 35549/36390 00-22494
12/28/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion. On December 26, 2000, petitioner filed a motion to file a reply in support of its writ petition. We grant petitioner's motion. The clerk of this court shall file, without delay, the reply and appendix received provisionally on December 26, 2000. Nos. 35549, 36390. 00-22654
12/28/2000Petition/WritFiled Reply to Answer to Petition. Franchise Tax Board of the State of California's Reply in Support of its Petition for a Writ of Mandamus Ordering Dismissal, or Alternatively for a Writ of Prohibition and Mandamus Limiting the Scope of this Case--"Confidential Information Filed under Seal." Nos. 35549/36390 00-22492
12/28/2000AppendixFiled Appendix. Appendix of Exhibits to Franchise Tax Board of the State of California's Reply in Support of its Petition for a Writ of Mandamus Ordering Dismissal, or Alternatively for a Writ of Prohibition and Mandamus Limiting the Scope of this Case--"Confidential Information Filed under Seal." Nos. 35549/36390 00-22494
01/02/2001MotionFiled Response to Motion. Real Party in Interest Gilbert P. Hyatt's Opposition to Franchise Tax Board of the State of California's Request to File a Reply in Support of its Petition or, in the Alternitive , Motion file Surreply (Confidential Information to be filed Under Seal) Nos. 35549/36390. 01-00026
01/04/2001Order/ProceduralFiled Order Denying Motion. On January 2, 2001, the real party in interest filed an opposition to petitioner's motion and, in the alternative, a motion to file a 'surreply.' We elect to treat the real party in interest's opposition as a motion for reconsideration of our December 28, 2000, order granting petitioner's motion. No good cause appearing, we deny the real party in interest's motion for reconsideration and, in the alternative, motion to file a 'surreply.' No. 35549 c/w 36390. 01-00217
01/24/2001Notice/OutgoingIssued Oral Argument Reminder Notice. Nos. 35549 and 36390.
02/02/2001MotionFiled Motion. Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief pursuant to NRAP 29 and for Leave to File Late Brief. (filed via fax) Nos. 35549/36390 01-02258
02/05/2001MotionFiled Motion. Motion for Leave to file Amicus Curiae Brief pursuant to N.R.A.P. 29 and for Leave to file Late Brief. Nos. 35549 and 36390. 01-02289
02/05/2001MotionFiled Response to Motion. Real Party in Interest Gilbert P. Hyatt's Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief Pursuant to NRAP 29 and for Leave to File Late Brief. Filed via FAX. Nos. 35549/36390 01-02353
02/06/2001MotionFiled Response to Motion. Real Party In Interest Gilbert P. Hyatt's Opposition to Motion for Leave to File Amicus Curiae Brief Pursuant to N.R.A.P. 29 and for Leave to File Late Brief (nos. 35549/36390). 01-02395
02/06/2001Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion. We have reviewed the motion and the opposition and we grant the motion. The clerk of this court shall file the amicus curiae brief of the Multistate Tax Commission received on February 2, 2001. Nos. 35549/36390. 01-02421
02/06/2001BriefFiled Amicus Brief. Multistate Tax Commission's Brief of Amicus Curiae. Nos. 35549/36390. (01-02260 faxed copies and 01-02292 original copies). 01-02260
02/09/2001Case Status Update Submitted for Decision. EN BANC-WM/CY/MS/DA/RR/ML. Nos. 35549/36390.
02/22/2001Notice/IncomingFiled Notice. Real Party in Interest Gilbert P. Hyatt's Notice of Recent Authority. Nos. 35549/36390 01-03349
02/27/2001Other Other. Filed Franchise Tax Board of the State of California's Response to Notice of Recent Authority Submitted by Real Party in Interest Gilbert P. Hyatt. Nos. 35549/36390 01-03657
03/02/2001Order/ProceduralFiled Order. These consolidated writ petitions were argued before the en banc court on February 9, 2001. On February 22, 2001, real party in interest Hyatt filed a "Notice of Recent Authority." On February 27, 2001, petitioner filed a response to Hyatt's notice of recent authority. Petitioner notes that Hyatt has failed to obtain leave of this court to file a late supplemental authority and, consequently, requests this court to strike the notice as an unauthorized document. We admonish real party in interest Hyatt for filing a supplemental authority after oral argument without first having obtained leave to file such an authority. Nevertheless, we decline to strike the notice and will consider the supplemental authority and petitioner's response thereto in resolving these matters. We caution counsel for Hyatt that failure to comply with the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure in the future may result in the imposition of sanctions. Nos. 35549/36390 (01-03897). 01-03897
06/13/2001Order/DispositionalFiled Order Dismissing Petition. Order Granting Petition (Docket No. 36390) and Dismissing Petition (Docket No. 35549). Consistent with our discussion above, we 'DISMISS AS MOOT the petition in Docket No. 35549.' fn16[The Honorable Nancy Becker, Justice, voluntarily recused herself from participation in the decision of this matter.] EN BANC-WM/CY/MS/DA/RR/ML. Nos. 35549/36390. NOTE: THIS DISPOSITION WAS VACATED BY ORDER FILED 4/4/02 01-09897
06/20/2001MotionFiled Motion. Real Party in Interest Gilbert P. Hyatt's Motion to Enlarge Time and Exceed Page Limitation of Petition for Rehearing. Nos. 35549/36390. 01-10365
06/21/2001MotionFiled Response to Motion. Opposition to Motion of Real Party in Interest Gilbert P. Hyatt's Motion to Enlarge Time and Exceed Page Limitation of Petition for Rehearing. Nos. 35549/36390 01-10500
06/25/2001MotionFiled Motion for Permission to File Document. Real Party in Interest Gilbert P. Hyatt's Request to File Reply in Support of Motion to Enlarge Time and Exceed Page Limitation of Petition for Rehearing. Nos. 35549/36390. 01-10643
06/25/2001MotionReceived Reply to Response. Real Party in Interest Gilbert P. Hyatt's Reply in Support of Motion to Enlarge Time and Exceed Page Limitation of Petition for Rehearing. Nos. 35549/36390. 01-10648
07/03/2001Other Other. Memorandum of Nev. R. App. Rule 39(c) Costs and Disbursements. Nos. 35549/36390. 01-11252
07/05/2001Other Other. Petition for Rehearing filed in case no. 36390 only - see docket entry in 36390. Okay per A.H.
07/13/2001Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Motion Granted in Part. Order Granting Motion in Part, and Directing Answer. On June 13, 2001, this court entered an order dismissing the petition in Docket No. 35549 and granting the petition in Docket No. 36390 in these consolidated writ proceedings. On June 25, 2001, Mr. Hyatt filed a motion for permission to file a reply in support of his motion for an extension of time. We grant that motion. The clerk shall file Mr. Hyatt's reply received on June 25, 2001. On July 5, 2001, Mr. Hyatt filed, in Docket No. 36390 only, a timely ten page petition for rehearing. Mr. Hyatt may file a 15 page supplement to the petition for rehearing that was filed in Docket No. 36390 on July 5, 2001. That supplement shall be filed and served within 10 days from the date of this order. The Tax Board shall have 15 days from the date of service of Mr. Hyatt's supplement to the petition for rehearing to file a 25 page answer to the petition and supplement. Failure to meet any of the filing deadlines set forth in this order may be deemed as a waiver of the right to file either the supplement or the answer, respectively. Nos. 35549/36390. (01-11919) 01-11919
07/13/2001MotionFiled Reply to Response. Real Party in Interest Gilbert P. Hyatt's Reply in Support of Motion to Enlarge Time and Exceed Page Limitation of Petition for Rehearing. Nos. 35549/36390. (01-10648) 01-10648
08/07/2001Post-Judgment PetitionFiled Answer to Petition for Rehearing. Answer to Hyatt's Petition for Rehearing and Supplemental Petition for Rehearing. (No. 36390 only--35549 was dismissed as moot.) Nos. 35549/36390 (01-13349)
08/07/2001AppendixFiled Appendix. Appendix to Answer to Hyatt's Petition for Rehearing and Supplemental Petition for Rehearing, Volumes 1 and 2. (No. 36390 only--35549 was dismissed as moot.) Nos. 35549/36390 (01-13350)
08/14/2001Notice/IncomingFiled Errata. Errata to Real Party In Interest Gilbert P. Hyatt's 15 Page Supplement to His Petition for Rehearing Re The Court's June 13, 2001, Order Granting Petition for Writ of Mandamus. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION TO BE FILED UNDER SEAL. Filed in no. 36390 only - case no. 35549 was dismissed as moot. Nos. 35549/36390.
08/22/2001Other Other. Response to Errata. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION TO BE FILED UNDER SEAL. Filed in Case no. 36390 only - case no. 35549 dismissed at moot. Nos. 35549/36390.
04/04/2002Order/DispositionalFiled Order Granting Petition. Order Granting Petition for Rehearing, Vacating Previous Order, Granting Petition for a Writ of Mandamus in Part in Docket No. 36390, and Granting Petition for a Writ of Prohibition in Part in Docket No. 35549. We grant Hyatt's petition for rehearing, vacate our June 13, 2001 order and issue this order in its place. We conclude that the district court should have declined to exercise jurisdiction over the negligence claim as a matter of comity. Accordingly, we grant the petition in Docket No. 36390 in part; the clerk of this court shall issue a writ of mandamus directing the district court to grant Franchise Tax Board's motion for summary judgment as to the negligence claim. We deny the petition in Docket No. 36390 with respect to the intentional tort claims, and we deny the alternative petition to limit the scope of trial. We conclude that the district court exceeded its jurisdiction by ordering the release of one privileged document, but that Franchise Tax Board has not demonstrated that the district court exceeded its jurisdiction by ordering it to release any of the other discovery documents at issue. Accordingly, we grant the petition in Docket No. 35549 in part; the clerk of this court shall issue a writ of prohibition prohibiting the district court from requiring Franchise Tax Board to release document FTB No. 07381. We deny the writ petition in Docket No. 35549 with respect to all other documents. We vacate our stay of the district court proceedings. fn28 [The Honorable Nancy Becker, Justice, voluntarily recused herself from participation in the decision of this matter.] EN BANC-WM/CY/MS/DA/ML. Rose, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part. Nos. 35549/36390 02-05954
04/04/2002WritIssued Writ. Original and one copy of writ and copy of order mailed to Bryan R. Clark for service upon Judge Nancy M. Saitta. 02-06028
04/16/2002WritFiled Writ. Served on Judge Nancy M. Saitta on April 11, 2002. 02-06028
04/30/2002RemittiturIssued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur. 02-06513
04/30/2002Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
07/15/2002Notice/IncomingFiled Notice from U.S. Supreme Court\Certiorari Denied. A petition for a writ of certiorari was filed July 2, 2002 and placed on the docket as Case No. 02-42. Nos. 35549/36390. 02-12063
08/09/2002Order/ProceduralFiled Order. On July 3, 2001, petitioner in the above consolidated matters filed a memorandum of costs pursuant to NRAP 39(c) for costs incurred in Docket No. 36390 based on our decision entered on June 13, 2001, granting the petition in Docket No. 36390. On April 4, 2002, this court entered an order on rehearing that, among other things, vacated our June 13, 2001, order. We disapprove the cost memorandum. fn1[On April 30, 2002, a notice in Lieu of Remittitur was issued and these consolidated cases were closed. Nos. 35549/36390. (02-13659) 02-13659
10/30/2002Letter/IncomingFiled Letter. from attorney Thomas R.C. Wilson. The U.S. Supreme Court has granted FTB's Petition for a Writ of Certiorari. He requests a complete copy of all files in nos. 35549, 36390, 39274 and 39312. 02-18691
11/07/2002Letter/IncomingFiled Letter. (via fax) from law firm of Bernhard, Bradley & Johnson, Chtd. They are requesting copies of all documents in 35549, 36390, 39274 and 39312. 02-19212
11/15/2002Other Other. Provided copies of all documents from docket numbers 35549, 36390, 39274 and 39312 to McDonald Carano law firm and Bernhard, Bradley & Johnson law firm. Nos. 35549/36390/ 39274/39312
11/18/2002Notice/IncomingFiled Notice from U.S. Supreme Court\Certiorari Granted. The petition for a writ of ceritorari to the Supreme Court of Nevada is granted (filed October 15, 2002). Nos. 35549/36390/39274/39312 02-19798
01/07/2003Letter/IncomingFiled Letter. from U.S. Supreme Court requesting transmission of certified copies of the entire record to their office. Nos. 35549/36390/39274/39312
01/09/2003Other Other. Transmitted to United States Supreme Court (via Federal Express) certified copies of entire record of proceedings in Nos. 35549, 36390, 39274, 39312 (Volumes 1 through 13 and nine white binders containing exhibits).
04/28/2003Letter/IncomingFiled Letter. and copy of Opinion filed in the United States Supreme Court (no action required). Nos. 35549/36390. 03-07218
05/19/2003Notice/OutgoingIssued Letter. to Bryan Murray (Bernhard & Bradley) regarding the status of these consolidated cases. Nos. 35549/36390.