Parties and Attorneys
VAN SMITH v. S.C. (PEOPLE)
Division SF
Division SF
Case Number S234291
| Party | Attorney |
|---|---|
| Theodric Van Smith : Petitioner | Nicole Marie Campbell Los Angeles County Public Defender 320 West Temple Street, Suite 590 Los Angeles, CA 90012 |
| Superior Court Los Angeles County : Respondent 210 West Temple Street Los Angeles, CA 90012 | |
| The People : Real Party in Interest | Attorney General - Los Angeles Office 300 S. Spring Street, Suite 5000 Los Angeles, CA 90013 Los Angeles County District Attorney Appellate Division 320 West Temple Street, Suite 540 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Phyllis Chiemi Asayama Office of the Los Angeles County District Attorney 320 W. Temple Street, Suite 540 Los Angeles, CA 90012-3266 Roberta T. Schwartz Office of the District Attorney/Appellate Division 320 W. Temple Street, Suite 540 Los Angeles, CA 90012-3266 |
Case Summary
Supreme Court Case:
S234291
Court of Appeal Case(s):
Second Appellate District, Div. 7
B271643
B271643
Case Caption:
VAN SMITH v. S.C. (PEOPLE)
Case Category:
Review - Criminal Original (non-H.C.)
Start Date:
05/05/2016
Case Status:
case closed
Issues:
none
Disposition Date:
06/29/2016
Case Citation:
none
Cross Referenced Cases:
No Cross Referenced Cases Found
Docket (Register of Actions)
VAN SMITH v. S.C. (PEOPLE)
Division SF
Division SF
Case Number S234291
| Date | Description | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 05/05/2016 | Petition for review filed | Petitioner: Theodric Van Smith Attorney: Nicole Marie Campbell CRC 8.25(b) |
| 05/05/2016 | Record requested | |
| 05/09/2016 | Received Court of Appeal record | |
| 05/10/2016 | Answer to petition requested | Dear Counsel: The court has directed that I request an answer to the above referenced matter. The petition was served on your office on May 2, 2016. The answer is to be served upon petitioner and filed in this court on or before May 25, 2016. Petitioner will then have ten (10) days in which to serve and file a reply to the answer. The answer should address all issues raised in the petition for review. Please be advised that the instant petition is a petition for review, and a ruling by the court is due on or before July 1, 2016. This request for an answer should be expedited by your office, and no request for extension of time is contemplated. |
| 05/26/2016 | Answer to petition for review filed | Real Party in Interest: The People Attorney: Phyllis Chiemi Asayama Attorney: Roberta T. Schwartz CRC 8.25(b). |
| 06/08/2016 | Reply to answer to petition filed | Petitioner: Theodric Van Smith Attorney: Nicole Marie Campbell CRC 8.25(b) |
| 06/29/2016 | Petition for review denied | Corrigan, J., was absent and did not participate. |
Briefs
VAN SMITH v. S.C. (PEOPLE)
Division SF
Division SF
Case Number S234291
No information found.
Disposition
VAN SMITH v. S.C. (PEOPLE)
Division SF
Division SF
Case Number S234291
Only the following dispositions are displayed below: Orders Denying Petitions, Orders Granting Rehearing and Opinions. Go to the Docket Entries screen for information regarding orders granting review.
Case Citation:
none
| Date | Description |
|---|---|
| 06/29/2016 | Petition for review denied |
Lower Court
VAN SMITH v. S.C. (PEOPLE)
Division SF
Division SF
Case Number S234291
Court of Appeal District/Division:
Second Appellate District , Div. 7
Court of Appeal Case Number:
B271643
Disposition:
Petition summarily denied by order
Disposition Date:
04/20/2016
Click the above Court of Appeal Case Number link for further information.
Trial Court:
Los Angeles County Superior Court
Trial Court Case Number:
ZM016913