| Case Information: 37123 | |||
| Short Caption: | KRIEG VS. FRIEDMAN | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Lower Court Case(s): | Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A3688619 | Classification: | Civil Appeal - Family Law - Proper Person |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | 05/11/2001 | How Submitted: | On Record |
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 12/07/2000 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee due. 03/01/01--Order granting in forma pauperis status filed in district court on 2/27/01. | ||
| 12/07/2000 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. | 00-21381 | |
| 12/13/2000 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee. Due Date: 10 days | ||
| 02/23/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. We direct the district court to enter an order in compliance with NRAP 24 within 30 days from the date of this order, and to provide a copy of the order to this court. fn2[Although appellant has not been granted leave to appear in proper person, we have nevertheless considered the proper person documents submitted by appellant. We defer ruling on any motions and requests contained therein.] | 01-03466 | |
| 03/01/2001 | Order/Incoming | Filed District Court Order. Order granting in forma pauperis status filed in district court on 2/27/01 (submitted by Judge Douglas). | 01-03807 | |
| 03/01/2001 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee Waived. | ||
| 04/06/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Transmit Record and Directing Response. Original record due: 30 days. fn1[The record shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court.] | 01-05989 | |
| 05/11/2001 | Record on Appeal Documents | Filed Record on Appeal. Volumes 1 and 2. | 01-07909 | |
| 05/11/2001 | Case Status Update | Submitted for Decision. | ||
| 11/13/2002 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. Directing Response. Respondent shall have 30 days from the date of this order to file a response, including authorities, addressing why the district court's order should not be reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings. fn3[Although appellant has not been granted leave to appear in proper person, see NRAP 46(b), we have nevertheless considered the proper person documents submitted by appellant. We defer ruling on any requests contained therein.] | 02-19528 | |
| 12/02/2002 | Motion | Filed Response to Order to Show Cause. Respondent Friedman's Response to this Court's 11/13/02 Order Directing Response. | 02-20513 | |
| 06/03/2003 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order of Affirmance. "ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED." fn2[The other arguments advanced by Krieg in his proper person documents are without merit. Although appellant was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, see NRAP 46(b), we have considered the proper person documents received from appellant.] SNP03-MS/ML/NB | 03-09283 | |
| 07/01/2003 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. Returned Record on Appeal, Vols 1 and 2 this day. | 03-09311 | |
| 07/01/2003 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
| 07/21/2003 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Notice from U.S. Supreme Court\Certiorari Denied. A petition for a writ of certiorari was filed June 3, 2003, and placed on the docket as Case No. 03-5319. | 03-12234 | |
| 07/31/2003 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on July 3, 2003. | 03-09311 | |
| 10/16/2003 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Notice from U.S. Supreme Court\Certiorari Granted. The petition for a writ of ceritorari is denied. | 03-17210 | |
| 12/05/2003 | Post-Judgment Order | Filed Order/Rehearing Denied. Order Denying Rehearing (Docket No. 37123) and Order Denying Petition (Docket No. 42199). On October 20, 2003, appellant/petitioner Harold Krieg submitted a document entitled 'Petition for Review.' Because this court could not determine if Krieg sought rehearing of his appeal in docket No. 37123, or if he sought to invoke this court's original jurisdiction through a petition for a writ of mandamus, prohibition, or certiorari, Krieg's document was docketed as a petition for rehearing in docket No. 37123, and as an original petition for writ relief under a new docket number (42199). To the extent that Krieg seeks rehearing of his appeal in Docket No. 37123, his request is untimely. 'We deny his petition for rehearing.' This court has previously considered and rejected in Krieg's appeal the arguments Krieg raises in his 'Petition for Review.' 'We deny the petition.' Nos. 37123/42199 – cases are not consolidated. | 03-20231 | |
| 01/26/2004 | Post-Judgment Order | Filed Order Denying En Banc Reconsideration. Having considered the petition on file herein, we have concluded that en banc reconsideration is not warranted. fn1[NRAP 40A.] Accordingly, we "ORDER the petition DENIED." fn2[Justice Leavitt participated in the decision of this case and died in office n January 9, 2004. Consequently, this matter was decided by a six-justice en banc court.] EN BANC | 04-01487 | |