judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

FRIEDMUTTER VS. CROWE

Case Information: 36847
Short Caption:FRIEDMUTTER VS. CROWECourt:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A374278Classification:Civil Appeal - General - Other
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:10/13/2000 / Davidson, MichaelSP Status:Completed
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:How Submitted:

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
10/09/2000Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Jason A. Awad, Ltd.--check no. 021039
10/09/2000Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Settlement. Notice re: settlement conference program/suspension of rules mailed to all counsel. 00-17780
10/13/2000Settlement NoticeIssued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Michael D. Davidson. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts and docketing statement suspended pending further order of this court.)
03/07/2001Settlement Program ReportFiled Interim Settlement Program Report. Plaintiff is in Chapter 7 Bankruptcy. 01-04148
06/13/2001Settlement Program ReportFiled Interim Settlement Program Report. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. 01-09931
06/13/2001Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice to File Docketing Statement. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) Due Date: 15 days
06/25/2001MotionFiled Stipulation/Dismiss Appeal. 01-10673
10/22/2001MotionFiled Motion to Dismiss Appeal. Request for Immediate Dismissal. 01-17743
12/07/2001Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Stipulation Disapproved. On June 25, 2001, respondent filed a stipulation to dismiss this appeal signed by respondent's counsel and appellant's bankruptcy trustee. We cannot determine whether the bankruptcy court ordered that this appeal may not ever be pursued and should be dismissed, or that this appeal is subject to the automatic bankruptcy stay under 111U.S.C. sec. 362(a)(1) and may not be pursued until the bankruptcy proceedings are resolved. Thus, if this matter is automatically stayed, we cannot dismiss this appeal at this time. We disapprove the stipulation. fn1[On October 22, 2001, respondent filed a 'Request for Immediate Dismissal.' In support of the request, respondent cites to the June 25, 2001 stipulation. For the reasons noted above, we deny this request.] Appellants counsel shall have 30 days from the date of this order to file a report informing this court whether this matter is automatically stayed under federal bankruptcy law. 01-20518
12/27/2001MotionFiled Motion to Dismiss Appeal. (filed by Marquis & Aurbach firm). 01-21752
01/11/2002MotionFiled Motion to Dismiss Appeal. (filed by Edwards, Hale, firm). 02-00852
03/20/2002Order/ProceduralFiled Order. On December 27, 2001, and January 11, 2002, respondent filed motion to dismiss this appeal. As we noted in our December 7, 2001 order, a nonbankruptcy court may not dismiss, but may only stay an action subject to the automatic bankruptcy stay. If this matter is automatically stayed, we cannot dismiss this appeal at this time. Based on review of the bankruptcy court's June 5, 2001 order, it appears that this appeal is subject to the automatic bankruptcy stay. The order does not lift the stay for the purpose of allowing this appeal to be dismissed and does not appear to prohibit appellant from pursing this appeal after the bankruptcy proceedings have concluded. We deny respondent's motions to dismiss, and we order this appeal stayed pursuant to the mandatory provisions of federal bankruptcy law. Fn2[Without a bankruptcy court order lifting the automatic stay or containing a directive that this appeal should be dismissed, this court is unable to grant any further requests to dismiss this appeal.] Appellant shall have 90 days from the date of this order to file a report informing this court of the status of the bankruptcy proceedings. 02-04998
06/20/2002MotionFiled Motion to Dismiss Appeal. Third Unopposed Motion to Dismiss. 02-10689
06/24/2002Other Other. Filed Edwards, Hale, Sturman, Atkin & Cushing, Ltd.'s Joinder in Respondent Cecile Crowe's Third Unopposed Motion to Dismiss. 02-10882
08/14/2002Order/DispositionalFiled Order Dismissing Appeal. We grant respondent's unopposed motion, and " . . . we dismiss this appeal." SNP02-CY/DA/ML 02-13907
09/10/2002RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 02-14167
09/10/2002Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
09/24/2002RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on September 13, 2002. 02-14167