judyrecords
search tips
770 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

ROWELL (LAMARR) VS. DISTRICT COURT

Case Information: 36998
Short Caption:ROWELL (LAMARR) VS. DISTRICT COURTCourt:Supreme Court
Related Case(s): 36601 , 36658 , 37023 , 37635 , 37749 , 37766 , 37767 , 37835 , 42909 , 43059 , 44665
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - C158223Classification:Original Proceeding - Criminal - Proper Person Writ Petition
Disqualifications:Case Status:Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:How Submitted:

Party Information
RoleParty NameRepresented By
PetitionerLamarr Rowell In Proper Person
Real Party in InterestAttorney General/Carson City
Real Party in InterestClark County District Attorney
Real Party in InterestThe State of NevadaAttorney General/Carson City
Clark County District Attorney
RespondentThe Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada, in and for the County of Clark
RespondentThe Honorable Mark W. Gibbons, District Judge

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
11/13/2000Filing Fee Filing Fee Waived.
11/13/2000Petition/WritFiled Proper Person Petition for Writ. Petition for Writ of Mandamus Peremptory: N.R.S. 34.150-34.310. 00-19885
01/12/2001Order/DispositionalFiled Order Denying Petition. Order Denying Petition for Writ of Mandamus. " . . . we deny the petition." fn1[We have considered all proper person documents filed or received in this matter, and we conclude that the relief requested is not warranted.] NNP00A-MS/DA/ML 01-00716
02/01/2001Post-Judgment OrderFiled Order/Rehearing Denied. "Rehearing denied." fn1[We have considerd all proper person documents filed or received in this matter, and we conclude that the relief requested is not warranted.] NNP00A-MS/DA/ML 01-02168
02/20/2001RemittiturIssued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur. 01-00801
02/20/2001Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
05/09/2001Post-Judgment OrderFiled Order Denying En Banc Reconsideration. We have reviewed appellant's petition and conclude that en banc reconsideration of the panel's decision are not warranted. " . . . we deny the petition." EN BANC-WM/CY/MS/DA/RR/ML/NB 01-07754