judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

TANSEY VS. BLAKE

Case Information: 36987
Short Caption:TANSEY VS. BLAKECourt:Supreme Court
Related Case(s): 37236
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A385642Classification:Civil Appeal - General - Other
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:11/17/2000 / Berkson, LesterSP Status:Completed
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:How Submitted:

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
11/13/2000Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Victor Lee Miller--check no. 10894.
11/13/2000Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Settlement. Notice re: settlement conference program/suspension of rules mailed to all counsel. 00-19813
11/17/2000Settlement NoticeIssued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Lester H. Berkson. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts and docketing statement suspended pending further order of this court.)
06/01/2001Settlement Program ReportFiled Interim Settlement Program Report. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. 01-09172
06/01/2001Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice to File Docketing Statement. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) Due Date: 15 days
07/17/2001Order/ProceduralFiled Order. To date appellant has failed to file the docketing statement. Appellant shall, within 10 days of the date of this order, file and serve the docketing statement. Failure to file a complete and accurate docketing statement in a timely manner may result in the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal of this appeal. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) 01-12137
10/17/2001Settlement Order/ProceduralFiled Order: No Settlement/Briefing Reinstated. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. To date, appellant has failed to comply with the notice issued on June 1, 2001, or the order entered on July 17, 2001. Appellant shall have 7 days from the date of this order to file and serve the docketing statement. Upon the filing of the docketing statement, this court shall conduct a preliminary jurisdictional review of this appeal. Appellant: 15 days to comply with NRAP 9(a); 120 days to file and serve opening brief and appendix. Briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1). (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) 01-17508
01/02/2002Order/DispositionalFiled Order Dismissing Appeal. To date, appellant has failed to file the docketing statement or otherwise respond to this courts June 1, 2001, notice or July 17, 2001, and October 17, 2001, orders. ' . . . we dismiss this appeal.' SNP02-CY/DA/ML 02-00035
01/25/2002Other Returned Unfiled Document. Returned, with letter: original and four copies of the Petition for Rehearing.
01/25/2002Filing Fee Returned Filing Fee. Check No. 2204 returned to Victor Lee Miller.
01/29/2002RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 02-00600
01/29/2002Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
02/04/2002Letter/IncomingFiled Letter. from attorney Victor Lee Miller regarding timely filing of the Petition for Rehearing. 02-02287
02/04/2002Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $100 from Victor Lee Miller-check no. 2204.
02/13/2002RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on February 1, 2002. 04/17/02 ORDER: REMITTITUR RECALLED. 02-00600
04/17/2002Order/ProceduralFiled Order. On January 25, 2002, appellant submitted a petition for rehearing. On that same date, the petition and the filing fee were returned to appellant's counsel, Victor Lee Miller, along with a letter noting that the petition was untimely. On January 29, 2002, the clerk of this court issued the remittitur. On February 4, 2002, Mr. Miller re-submitted the petition and the filing fee along with a letter disputing the timeliness of the petition that was originally submitted on January 25, 2002. We conclude that the petition for rehearing originally submitted on January 25, 2002, was not untimely. We direct the clerk of this court to file the petition for rehearing that was re-submitted on February 4, 2002. We recall the remittitur issued on January 29, 2002, and we stay issuance of the remittitur pending the resolution of the petition for rehearing. 02-06881
04/17/2002Post-Judgment PetitionFiled Petition for Rehearing. Mailed on: 2/1/02. 02-02288
05/20/2002Post-Judgment OrderFiled Order/Rehearing Denied. "Rehearing denied." NRAP 49( c). SNP02-CY/DA/ML 02-08805
06/04/2002RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 02-09056
06/04/2002Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
06/17/2002RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on June 11, 2002. 02-09056