judyrecords
search tips
770 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

LAS VEGAS DEMOLITION VS. ORTIZ FAMILY TRUST

Case Information: 34006
Short Caption:LAS VEGAS DEMOLITION VS. ORTIZ FAMILY TRUSTCourt:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A386853Classification:Civil Appeal - General - Other
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:04/15/1999 / Christensen, ThomasSP Status:Completed
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:06/06/2000How Submitted:On Briefs

Party Information
RoleParty NameRepresented By
AppellantLas Vegas DemolitionAlthea Gilkey
RespondentLydia O. OrtizJoseph F. Dempsey (Dempsey Roberts & Smith, Ltd.)
RespondentOrtiz Family TrustJoseph F. Dempsey (Dempsey Roberts & Smith, Ltd.)
RespondentReynaldo G. OrtizJoseph F. Dempsey (Dempsey Roberts & Smith, Ltd.)

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
04/07/1999Filing Fee Filing Fee due.
04/07/1999MotionFiled Motion for Stay. Emergency Motion for Stay of Order Pending Appeal. 99-02594
04/08/1999Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Althea Gilkey--Western Union M.O. #026-33470720.
04/08/1999Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) 99-02647
04/15/1999Settlement NoticeIssued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Thomas F. Christensen. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts suspended pending further order of this court.)
04/26/1999Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement. 99-03255
05/04/1999Order/ProceduralFiled Order Denying Motion. This is a motion for a stay pending appeal from an order denying a motion for relief from judgment. Appellant has not demonstrated that these factors militate in favor of a stay. We deny appellant's motion. 99-03566
05/13/1999Settlement Program ReportFiled Interim Settlement Program Report. The settlement conference is continued to the following date: May 27, 1999. 99-03920
07/06/1999Settlement Program ReportFiled Interim Settlement Program Report. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. 99-05932
07/26/1999Order/ProceduralFiled Order. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. Nevertheless, the briefing and request for transcripts shall remain suspended pending a jurisdictional review and further order of this court. 99-06711
08/25/1999Settlement Order/ProceduralFiled Order: No Settlement/Briefing Reinstated. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this appeal. Appellant: 15 days to comply with provisions of NRAP 9(a); 120 days to file opening brief and appendix. Thereafter, briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1). 99-07951
09/13/1999Transcript RequestFiled Request for Transcript of Proceedings. Proceedings: dated March 29, 1999. To Court Reporter: Roger D. Calabrese. 99-08604
12/27/1999BriefFiled Opening Brief. Mailed on: 12/23/99. 99-13218
12/27/1999AppendixFiled Appendix to Opening Brief. 99-13219
02/24/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Respondents shall, within 20 days of the date of this order, file and serve the answering brief or show cause why their failure should not be treated as a confession of error. On September 13, 1999, appellant filed a transcript request form. To date, no transcripts have been filed. Court reporter Calabrese shall, within 10 days of the date of this order, fully comply with NRAP 9(b), explain his failure to comply with NRAP 9(b) or show cause why sanctions should not be imposed upon him. 00-02950
03/16/2000TranscriptFiled Transcript. Proceedings: March 29, 1999. Court Reporter: Roger D. Calabrese. 00-04166
03/16/2000MotionFiled Response to Order to Show Cause. Letter from Court Reporter Roger D. Calabrese regarding Order to Show Cause. 00-04167
03/16/2000BriefFiled Answering Brief. Mailed on: 3/14/00. 00-04220
03/22/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order. On March 16, 2000, attorney Joseph F. Dempsey filed an answer brief on behalf of respondents. The court's docket reflects that counsel of record for respondents is the law firm of Marquis & Aurbach. Attorney Dempsey shall have 10 days from the date of this order to file and serve a notice appearance in this appeal as co-counsel for respondents. 00-04533
03/24/2000Notice/OutgoingIssued Letter. to court reporter Roger Calabrese in response to letter received 3/16/00 re: filing of transcripts.
03/30/2000MotionFiled Motion. Dempsey, Roberts & Smith in place and stead of Marquis & Aurbach as counsel for respondents. 00-05144
04/05/2000Notice/IncomingFiled Notice of Appearance. Joseph F. Dempsey of the law firm of Dempsey, Roberts & Smith, Ltd. files his Notice of Appearance herein as attorney of record for Oritz Family Trust, Reynaldo G. Ortiz and Lydia O. Ortiz, as Trustees (no action required). 00-05468
04/17/2000BriefFiled Reply Brief. Mailed on: Fed Ex 4/15/00. 00-06096
06/06/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Oral argument will not be scheduled and this appeal shall stand submitted as of the date of this order, on the record and briefs filed herein. 00-09468
06/06/2000Case Status Update Submitted for Decision.
07/13/2000Order/DispositionalFiled Order Dismissing Appeal. "ORDER this appeal dismissed." fn1[In the reply brief, appellant requested that sanctions be imposed against respondents. Generally, a request for sanctions must be raised by motion pursuant to NRAP 27. Appellant has not done so here. Thus, we decline to impose sanctions. We caution respondents that future briefs must comply with NRAP 28.] NNP99B-CY/DA/ML 00-12044
08/08/2000RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 00-13777
08/08/2000Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
09/20/2000RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on Septmber 1, 2000. 00-13777