| Docket Entries |
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 10/20/2000 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee due. | | |
| 10/20/2000 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Settlement. Notice re: settlement conference program/suspension of rules mailed to all counsel. | | 00-18605
|
| 10/20/2000 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee. Due Date: 10 days | | |
| 10/20/2000 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice to File Case Appeal Statement. Due Date: 10 days | | |
| 10/25/2000 | Settlement Notice | Issued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: David K. Robinson. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts and docketing statement suspended pending further order of this court.) | | |
| 11/03/2000 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Law Offices of Hamilton D. Moore--check no. 8264. | | |
| 11/03/2000 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Case Appeal Statement. Filed in district court on: October 25, 2000. | | 00-19344
|
| 01/11/2001 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Substitution of Attorneys. Salvatore Geraci and Carmen Geraci hereby substitute John R. Lusk at their attorney in place of Hamilton D. Moore. | | 01-00683
|
| 01/16/2001 | Notice/Outgoing | Letter. David K. Robinson. | | |
| 01/19/2001 | Settlement Program Report | Filed Interim Settlement Program Report. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. | | 01-01269
|
| 01/19/2001 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice to File Docketing Statement. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) Due Date: 15 days | | |
| 01/26/2001 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Substitution of Attorneys. Hamilton Moore substitutes for John R. Lusk as counsel for appellants. | | 01-01736
|
| 02/20/2001 | Docketing Statement | Filed Docketing Statement. | | 01-03145
|
| 03/07/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Briefing Schedule. We consolidate the above-entitled appeals for all appellate purposes. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of these matters. This court shall conduct a preliminary jurisdictional review of these appeals. Appellants: 15 days to comply with NRAP 9(a); 120 days to file and serve opening brief and appendix. Briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1). Nos. 36895/36896. (01-04126) | | |
| 03/26/2001 | Transcript Request | Filed Request for Transcript of Proceedings. Transcripts requested: 1/6/99; 1/27/99; 3/3/99; 3/10/99; 10/18/99; 11/18/99; 2/7/00; 2/10/00; 2/14/00; 3/10/00; 3/30/00; 3/31/00; 5/19/00; 5/24/00; 5/31/00; 8/9/00; 8/23/00 (2); 9/6/00; 9/13/00; 10/18/00; 11/18/00; 11/22/00; 1/17/01; 2/7/01; and 3/14/01. To Court Reporter: Transcript Services. Nos. 36895/36896 (01-05275). | | |
| 06/11/2001 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Proof of Service. for Request for Transcript of Proceedings. Nos. 36895/36896 (01-09727) | | |
| 06/11/2001 | Motion | Filed Motion to Extend Time. Filed Motion for Extension of Time to Prepare Transcript. Nos. 36895/36896 [01-09735] | | |
| 06/11/2001 | Motion | Filed Stipulation and Order. Brief due: August 6, 2001. Nos. 36895/36896 [01-09736] | | |
| 06/13/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Extending Time. Court Reporter Deborah Casper shall have to and including August 6, 2001, to prepare and file the transcripts. We elect to extend the due date for the filing of the opening brief and appendix to and including September 5, 2001. Thereafter, briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1). Nos. 36895/36896 [01-09835] | | |
| 06/13/2001 | Transcript Request | Filed Request for Transcript of Proceedings. (Amended.) Transcripts requested: 9/30/98; 1/6/99; 1/27/99; 3/3/99; 3/10/99; 10/18/99; 11/18/99; 2/7/00; 2/10/00; 2/14/00; 3/10/00; 3/30/00; 3/31/00; 5/19/00; 5/24/00; 5/31/00; 8/9/00; 8/23/00; 9/6/00; 9/13/00; 10/18/00; 11/18/00; 11/22/00; 1/17/01; 2/7/01; and 3/14/01. To Court Reporter: Transcript Services. Nos. 36895/36896. [01-09891] | | |
| 07/26/2001 | Transcript | Filed Transcript. Proceedings: 1/6/99; 1/27/99; 3/3/99; 3/10/99; 9/30/99; 10/18/99; 11/18/99; 5/19/00; 5/24/00; 5/31/00; 8/9/00; 9/6/00; 9/13/00; 10/18/00; 11/22/00; 1/17/01; 2/7/01; and 3/14/01: Court Reporters: Shelly A. Ajoub and Cline Transcription Services. Nos. 36895/36896 (01-12670). | | |
| 08/30/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Show Cause. These are consolidated appeals. Response due from the Geracis: 30 days from the date of this order. The briefing schedule in these appeals is suspended pending further order of this court. Nos. 36895/36896. | | |
| 10/02/2001 | Motion | Filed Response to Order to Show Cause. Points and Authorities re: Order to Show Cause filed August 30, 2001. Nos. 36895/36896. (01-16579) | | |
| 10/03/2001 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Proof of Service. Response to Order to Show Cause. Nos. 36895/36896 (01-16646). | | |
| 11/01/2001 | Motion | Filed Motion. Motion for Leave to Amend a Judgment Due to Clerical Error of the District Court of Clark County Nevada. Nos. 36895/36896 (01-18305) | | |
| 11/13/2001 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Notice of Change of Address. Law Offices of Hamilton D. Moore. Nos. 36895/36896 (01-18875). | | |
| 11/19/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. On June 13, 2001, appellants filed an amended transcript request form requesting the preparation of transcripts by Transcript Video Services. Among the transcripts requested were transcripts for proceedings conducted on February 7, 2000; February 10, 2000; February 14, 2000; March 30, 2000; March 31, 2000; August 23, 2000; and November 18, 2000. Our review of the district court records indicates that no proceedings were held on those dates. Accordingly, we conclude that Transcript Video Services need not produce transcripts for those dates. We further conclude that all requested transcripts have been filed with this court. We admonish appellant's counsel for including in the transcript request form dates upon which no district court proceedings were held. (01-19362), Nos. 36895/38696. | | |
| 02/07/2002 | Motion | Filed Motion. Appellant Geracis' Motion to Substitute Real Party in Interest. Nos. 36895/36896 [02-02498] | | |
| 02/15/2002 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order Dismissing Appeal. These are consolidated appeals. fn4[On November 1, 2001, respondent filed a motion requesting leave of this court to correct a clerical error in the order concerning the amount owed to Ronald. In light of our order dismissing these appeals for lack of jurisdiction, we deny the motion as moot. We also deny the February 7, 2002 motion to substitute parties as moot.] fn8[Our decision does not preclude the Geracis from filing a petition for extraordinary relief challenging the district court's order.] "ORDER these appeals DISMISSED." Nos. 36895/36896. | | 02-03036
|
| 02/15/2002 | Motion | Filed Motion. Second Motion for Leave to Amend a Judgment Due to a Newly Discovered Clerical Error of the District Court of Clark County, Nevada pursuant to NRCP 60(a). Nos. 36895/36896 (02-03087) | | |
| 03/12/2002 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. | | 02-03237
|
| 03/12/2002 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | | |
| 03/29/2002 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Denying Motion. On February 15, 2002, this court dismissed these appeals for lack of jurisdiction. On the same day, respondent filed a motion for leave to correct a clerical error in the report and recommendation adopted by the district court. In light of this court's order dismissing these appeals on jurisdictional grounds, respondent's motion is denied as moot. Nos. 36895/36896. (02-05633) | | |
| 04/01/2002 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on March 20, 2002. | | 02-03237
|