| Case Information: 35270 | |||
| Short Caption: | DUKE (ANYA) VS. DISTRICT COURT | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Related Case(s): | 33874 , 35377 , 35389 , 36195 , 36716 , 42820 , 43337 , 46444 , 47144 , 48263 , 53705 , 57570 , 60123 | ||
| Lower Court Case(s): | Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A340508 | Classification: | Original Proceeding - Civil - Proper Person Writ Petition |
| Disqualifications: | Leavitt | Case Status: | Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | How Submitted: | ||
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 12/10/1999 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee due. | ||
| 12/10/1999 | Petition/Writ | Filed Proper Person Petition for Writ. Petition for Writ of Mandamus. | 99-12415 | |
| 12/10/1999 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee. Due Date: 10 days | ||
| 01/12/2000 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order Denying Petition. Order Denying Petition for Writ of Mandamus. " . . . we deny the petition." fn1[We direct the clerk to waive the writ petiton filing fee. We deny petitioner's other motions. Although petitioner was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, we have considered the proper person documents reeived from petitioner]. NNP99B-RR/CY/DA | 00-00554 | |
| 02/15/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Denying Motion. On January 12, 2000, we entered an order denying this proper person petition for a writ of mandamus. On January 18, 2000, the court clerk received counter motions from the petitioner and the real parties in interest. These motions, which do not seek relief from the order denying the writ petition, are denied as moot. On January 24, 2000, the court clerk received from petitioner a request for clarification of the order denying her writ petition, and on January 31, 2000, an opposition from the real parties in interest. We concluded that petitioner did not establish that our intervention by way of extraordinary writ was warrranted. Further clarification is deemed unnecessary. | 00-02360 | |
| 02/15/2000 | Remittitur | Issued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur. | 00-02390 | |
| 02/15/2000 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||