| Date Docketed | Description | Filed By | Notes |
| 07/20/2021 | Notice of Appeal Filed | John F. Schutz 0067210 | |
| 07/21/2021 | Acknowledgment Letter | | |
| 07/21/2021 | ORD-Pay Filing Fee-Civil Appeal | | The jurisdiction of this court was invoked by filing of a Notice of Appeal in the lower tribunal. The $300.00 filing fee required by the applicable rule of procedure and Section 35.22(2)(a), Florida Statutes, is due and payable REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THE APPEAL IS LATER DISMISSED VOLUNTARILY OR ADVERSELY. ORDERED that appellant shall pay the $300.00 filing fee or file the lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The fee may be paid electronically through the Florida Courts E-Filing Portal – see the court’s website for details. Failure to comply within the time prescribed will result in dismissal of this cause and may result in the court sanctioning of any party, or the party's attorney, who has not paid the filing fee. The attorney filing the Notice of Appeal has a duty to tender the filing fee to the appellate court when the appeal is initiated. See In Re Payment of Filing Fees, 744 So. 2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). Failure of the attorney to pay will result in referral to the Department of Financial Services for collection. **NOTE: This order does not toll the time for filing any pleadings necessary to prosecute this appeal and no extensions of time will be entertained. Once the fee is paid, it is not refundable. Except for dismissal, this court will take no action in this appeal until the filing fee is paid or until a lower tribunal clerk's determination of indigent status is filed. |
| 07/22/2021 | AA - File Statement for Basis of Jurisdiction | | ORDERED that, within ten (10) days from the date of this order, appellant shall file in this court a brief statement explaining the basis for this court's subject matter jurisdiction over the order appealed in this case, citing supporting legal authorities. Appellant shall specifically address how the notice of appeal is timely filed, in that the order on appeal was entered on May 3, 2021, and the circuit court docket reflects a May 18, 2021 order on “Petitioner’s Motion for Rehearing” and a July 8, 2021 order on “the Former Wife’s Motion for Rehearing.” Both orders deny rehearing and appear to be directed towards appellant’s May 17, 2021 motion for rehearing pursuant to Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure 12.540 and 12.530. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.020(h)(1), 9.110(b). Further, Appellee may file a response within ten (10) days of service of that statement. |
| 07/28/2021 | Response | John F. Schutz 0067210 | TO ORDER DATED JULY 22, 2021 |
| 07/28/2021 | Response | John F. Schutz 0067210 | TO ORDER DATED JULY 22, 2021 (EXHIBITS ATTACHED) |
| 07/29/2021 | Stricken - Non-Compliance With R. 9.045 | | ORDERED that both of appellant’s July 28, 2021 responses are stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045, which became effective January 1, 2021, in that they are computer-generated documents which do not comply with the font requirements set forth in Rule 9.045(b). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.045(b) (“Computer-generated documents shall be filed in either Arial 14-point font or Bookman Old Style 14-point font.”). Amended documents in compliance with Rule 9.045 shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order. |
| 07/29/2021 | Jurisdictional Brief | John F. Schutz 0067210 | |
| 08/10/2021 | ORD-Sua Sponte Dismiss-No Filing Fee | | **REINSTATED** ORDERED sua sponte that the above-styled appeal is dismissed for non-payment of the $300.00 filing fee. |
| 08/10/2021 | Dismissed - Order by Clerk | | **REINATATED** |
| 08/10/2021 | Case Filing Fee | | |
| 08/11/2021 | Miscellaneous Entry/Document | | Invoice voided |
| 08/11/2021 | Motion For Reinstatement | John F. Schutz 0067210 | |
| 08/11/2021 | ORD-Reinstatement | | ORDERED that appellant's August 11, 2021 motion for reinstatement is granted, and the above-styled appeal is reinstated. |
| 08/27/2021 | Miscellaneous Order | | ORDERED that, upon consideration of the appellant’s August 18, 2021 jurisdictional brief, this appeal shall proceed. |
| 09/10/2021 | Received Records | Clerk Palm Beach CC02 | (2002 PAGES) |
| 09/10/2021 | Transcript Received | Clerk Palm Beach CC02 | (368 PAGES) |
| 09/17/2021 | Motion To File Supplemental Record | Robert M.W. Shalhoub 0255361 | |
| 09/17/2021 | Order Granting Motion to Supplement the Record | | ORDERED that appellee's September 17, 2021 motion to supplement the record is granted. The material requested in the motion shall be included in the record on appeal. The clerk of the lower tribunal shall prepare and file the supplemental material in this court within ten (10) days from the date of this order. Appellee shall monitor the supplementation process. |
| 09/23/2021 | Supplemental Records | Clerk Palm Beach CC02 | (52 PAGES) |
| 10/06/2021 | Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief | John F. Schutz 0067210 | **STRICKEN** |
| 10/07/2021 | Stricken - Non-Compliance With R. 9.045 | | ORDERED that appellant's October 6, 2021 motion is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.045, which became effective January 1, 2021, in that it is a computer-generated document which does not comply with the font requirements set forth in Rule 9.045(b). See Fla. R. App. P. 9.045(b) (“Computer-generated documents shall be filed in either Arial 14-point font or Bookman Old Style 14-point font.”). An amended document in compliance with Rule 9.045 shall be filed within two (2) days from the date of this order. |
| 10/07/2021 | Mot. for Extension of time to file Initial Brief | John F. Schutz 0067210 | |
| 10/08/2021 | Order Granting EOT for Initial Brief | | ORDERED that appellant's October 7, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellant shall serve the initial brief on or before November 4, 2021. In addition, if the initial brief is not served within the time provided for in this order, the above-styled case may be subject to dismissal or the court in its discretion may impose other sanctions. |
| 11/04/2021 | Initial Brief on Merits | John F. Schutz 0067210 | **STRICKEN** |
| 11/05/2021 | ORD-Stricken | | ORDERED that appellant's initial brief is stricken as not in compliance with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.210 in that the table of contents does not list the issues for review. An amended brief in compliance with the rules shall be filed within ten (10) days from the date of this order. The time for any responsive briefing shall be tolled until service of this amended brief. |
| 11/05/2021 | Amended Appellant's Initial Brief | John F. Schutz 0067210 | |
| 11/15/2021 | Mot. for Extension of time to file Answer Brief | | |
| 11/23/2021 | Order Granting EOT for Answer Brief | | ORDERED that appellee’s November 15, 2021 motion for extension of time is granted, and appellee shall serve the answer brief within ninety (90) days from the current due date. In addition, appellee is notified that the failure to serve the brief within the time provided herein may foreclose appellee’s right to file a brief or otherwise participate in this appeal. |
| 01/20/2022 | Appellee's Answer Brief | Robert M.W. Shalhoub 0255361 | |
| 01/24/2022 | Motion For Attorney's Fees | Robert M.W. Shalhoub 0255361 | |
| 02/18/2022 | Appellant's Reply Brief | John F. Schutz 0067210 | |
| 06/08/2022 | Affirmed - Authored Opinion | | IN PART; DISMISSED IN PART |
| 06/08/2022 | Order Granting Attorney's Fees | | ORDERED that the appellee’s January 24, 2022 motion for appellate attorney's fees is granted in part, pursuant to the antenuptial agreement signed by the parties. On remand, the trial court shall set the amount of the attorney's fees to be awarded for this appellate case as to issues 1, 2, 5, and 6 on appeal, as identified in this court's merits opinion in this case. If a motion for rehearing regarding any of the same issues is filed in this court, then services rendered in connection with the filing of the motion, including, but not limited to, preparation of a responsive pleading, shall be taken into account in computing the amount of the fee. The appellee’s motion is denied as to the request for attorney’s fees pursuant to Rosen v. Rosen, 696 So. 2d 697 (Fla. 1997). |
| 06/24/2022 | Mandate | | |
| 06/24/2022 | West Publishing | | |