| Case Information: 36688 | |||
| Short Caption: | SECURITY DOORS VS. EICON | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Lower Court Case(s): | Washoe Co. - Second Judicial District - CV9606263 | Classification: | Civil Appeal - Family Law - Proper Person |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | 09/15/2000 | How Submitted: | On Record |
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 09/01/2000 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Echo Penrose (Bank of the West-M.O. #2470958071) | ||
| 09/01/2000 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. | 00-15472 | |
| 09/11/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Transmit Record and Directing Response. Original record due: 30 days. fn1[The record shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court.] | 00-15996 | |
| 09/15/2000 | Record on Appeal Documents | Filed Record on Appeal. | 00-16343 | |
| 09/15/2000 | Case Status Update | Submitted for Decision. | ||
| 11/15/2000 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Dispositional Order/Appeal. Order Vacating District Court Order. fn1[Although appellant has not been granted leave to file documents in this matter in proper person, we have received and considered appellant's proper person documents.] " . . . we vacate the district courts order and remand to the district court with instructions to dismiss the petition for judicial review." NNP00A-MS/DA/ML | 00-20035 | |
| 11/22/2000 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $100 from Echo Penrose- Money Order No. 02751431448. | ||
| 12/14/2000 | Post-Judgment Order | Filed Order/Rehearing Denied. Appellant has submitted a petition for rehearing, which asserts that the petition for judicial review was, in fact, filed on time. We conclude that appellant has misinterpreted NRCP 6(a) and (e). Appellant's petition for judicial review was filed on Wednesday, September 25, 1996, one day too late to vest jurisdiction in the district court. " . . . we deny the petition for rehearing." fn1[Although appellant has not been granted leave to file documents in this matter in proper person, we have received and considered appellant's proper person documents.] | 00-21874 | |
| 01/02/2001 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. Returned Record on Appeal this day. | 00-22020 | |
| 01/02/2001 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
| 01/11/2001 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on January 3, 2001. | 00-22020 | |