judyrecords
search tips
750 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

SECURITY DOORS VS. EICON

Case Information: 36688
Short Caption:SECURITY DOORS VS. EICONCourt:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Washoe Co. - Second Judicial District - CV9606263Classification:Civil Appeal - Family Law - Proper Person
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:09/15/2000How Submitted:On Record

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
09/01/2000Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Echo Penrose (Bank of the West-M.O. #2470958071)
09/01/2000Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. 00-15472
09/11/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Transmit Record and Directing Response. Original record due: 30 days. fn1[The record shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court.] 00-15996
09/15/2000Record on Appeal DocumentsFiled Record on Appeal. 00-16343
09/15/2000Case Status Update Submitted for Decision.
11/15/2000Order/DispositionalFiled Dispositional Order/Appeal. Order Vacating District Court Order. fn1[Although appellant has not been granted leave to file documents in this matter in proper person, we have received and considered appellant's proper person documents.] " . . . we vacate the district courts order and remand to the district court with instructions to dismiss the petition for judicial review." NNP00A-MS/DA/ML 00-20035
11/22/2000Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $100 from Echo Penrose- Money Order No. 02751431448.
12/14/2000Post-Judgment OrderFiled Order/Rehearing Denied. Appellant has submitted a petition for rehearing, which asserts that the petition for judicial review was, in fact, filed on time. We conclude that appellant has misinterpreted NRCP 6(a) and (e). Appellant's petition for judicial review was filed on Wednesday, September 25, 1996, one day too late to vest jurisdiction in the district court. " . . . we deny the petition for rehearing." fn1[Although appellant has not been granted leave to file documents in this matter in proper person, we have received and considered appellant's proper person documents.] 00-21874
01/02/2001RemittiturIssued Remittitur. Returned Record on Appeal this day. 00-22020
01/02/2001Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
01/11/2001RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on January 3, 2001. 00-22020