judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

VRANESH VS. MUSHKIN

Case Information: 35156
Short Caption:VRANESH VS. MUSHKINCourt:Supreme Court
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A258029Classification:Civil Appeal - General - Other
Disqualifications:Leavitt, Maupin, Rose, ShearingCase Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Justice Agosti for Justice Rose
Senior Justice Young for Senior Justice Shearing
Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:11/24/1999 / Cohen, LarrySP Status:Completed
Oral Argument:12/10/2001 at 10:30 AMOral Argument Location:Carson City
Submission Date:12/10/2001How Submitted:After Oral Argument

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
11/19/1999Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Frank J. Cremen--check no. 13862.
11/19/1999Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. 99-11553
11/19/1999OtherDisqualification of Justice Leavitt.
11/24/1999Settlement NoticeIssued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Larry J. Cohen. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts and docketing statement suspended pending further order of this court.)
12/07/1999OtherDisqualification of Justice Shearing. Sat in district court proceedings.
12/15/1999OtherDisqualification of Justice Maupin. Sat in district court proceedings.
06/08/2000Settlement Program ReportFiled Interim Settlement Program Report. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this matter. 00-09680
06/08/2000Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice to File Docketing Statement. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) Due Date: 15 days
06/19/2000Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement. 00-10483
06/20/2000Settlement Order/ProceduralFiled Order: No Settlement/Briefing Reinstated. The parties were unable to agree to a settlement of this appeal. Upon the filing of the docketing statement, this court shall conduct a preliminary jurisdictional review of this appeal. Appellant: 15 days to comply with NRAP 9(a); 120 days to file and serve opening brief and appendix. Briefing shall proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1). 00-10506
06/29/2000Transcript RequestFiled Certificate of No Transcript Request. 00-11131
10/16/2000BriefFiled Opening Brief. Mailed on: 10/13/00. 00-18307
10/16/2000AppendixFiled Appendix to Opening Brief. 00-18308
10/26/2000Notice/IncomingFiled Errata. To Appellant's Opening Brief. Attached to back of Opening Brief. 00-18956
10/30/2000Notice/IncomingFiled Notice of Change of Address. 00-19122
11/08/2000MotionFiled Motion and Order Extending Time. Brief due: December 15, 2000. 00-19672
12/11/2000MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. (Second Request). 00-21618
12/13/2000Order/Clerk'sFiled Clerk's Order Granting Motion. Respondents' answering brief shall be served and filed on or before January 16, 2001. 00-21813
01/16/2001BriefFiled Answering Brief. Mailed on: Fed Ex 01/12/01. 01-00848
01/16/2001AppendixFiled Appendix to Answering Brief. 01-00850
02/09/2001MotionFiled Stipulation. 01-02685
02/09/2001Order/Clerk'sFiled Clerk's Order Approving Stipulation. Appellant's reply brief shall be served and filed on or before March 14, 2001. 01-02712
03/14/2001BriefFiled Reply Brief. Mailed on: Fed Ex 03/13/01. 01-04561
07/17/2001Order/ProceduralFiled Order. On January 16, 2001, respondents filed an answering brief and appendix. Our review of respondents' appendix indicates that four documents included in the appendix are not part of the district court record below. The documents entitled 'Substitution of Attorney' filed on March 27, 2001, in district court case no. A 213278; 'ORDER' filed on June 5, 1989 in district court case no. CV-S-89-34-PMP; and 'Answer to Amended Complaint' filed on March 21, 1998 in district court case no. A357937; and the unpublished opinion filed on July 23, 1990, in the United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, were filed in separate proceedings and were not considered by the district court below. Accordingly, this court will disregard any references or citations to the above documents that may be present in the briefs filed in this appeal. 01-12153
07/23/2001MotionFiled Motion. Motion for Amendment to Order of July 17, 2001. 01-12470
07/30/2001MotionFiled Response to Motion. Opposition to Motion for Amendment to Order of July 17, 2001. 01-12869
08/14/2001Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion. filed July 23, 2001. We amend our July 17, 2001, order. This court will only disregard the documents entitled "Substitution of Attorney" filed on March 27, 2001, in district court case number A213278 and "ORDER" filed on June 5, 1989, in district court case number CV-S-89-34-PMP when taking this matter under consideration. 01-13870
08/23/2001OtherDisqualification of Justice Rose.
10/30/2001Notice/OutgoingIssued Notice Scheduling Oral Argument. Oral Argument is scheduled for 30 minutes on December 10, 2001, at 10:30 a.m. in Carson City. (NNP02-CY/DA/NB)
11/26/2001Notice/OutgoingIssued Oral Argument Reminder Notice.
12/10/2001Case Status Update Submitted for Decision. Before the Northern Nevada Panel. NNP02-MS/RR/NB.
03/06/2002Order/DispositionalFiled Order of Affirmance. "ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED." fn15[We have considered Vranesh's claims related to issues of res judicata, due process violations and judicial delay in addition to both party's assertions regarding the necessity of sanctions pursuant to NRAP 28(a)(3) and (e). We conclude that these claims lack merit and do not warrant further discussion.] NNP02-CY/DA/NB 02-04085
04/02/2002RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 02-04162
04/02/2002Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
04/15/2002RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on April 4, 2002. 02-04162