Parties and Attorneys
Mokler v. County of Orange et al.
Case Number G036029
| Party | Attorney |
|---|---|
| Pamela Mokler : Plaintiff-appellant-x/respond | Howard Bryan Card 1442 Irvine Blvd., Suite 228 Tustin, CA 92780 Stuart B. Esner Esner & Chang 80 S. Lake Ave., Suite 720 Pasadena, CA 91101 Robert H. Pourvali 3835-R E. Thousand Oaks Blvd., #207 Westlake Village, CA 91362 |
| County of Orange : Defendant-respondent-x/appellant | Norman J. Watkins Lynberg & Watkins 333 City Boulevard West, Suite 640 Orange, CA 92868-5915 Kim Le Nguyen Horvitz & Levy LLP 15760 Ventura Blvd 18FL Encino, CA 91436 |
| Chris Norby : Defendant-respondent-x/appellant | Norman J. Watkins Lynberg & Watkins 333 City Boulevard West Suite 640 Orange, CA 92868-5915 Kim Le Nguyen Horvitz & Levy LLP 15760 Ventura Blvd 18FL Encino, CA 91436 |
Case Summary
Trial Court Case:
04CC02423
Court of Appeal Case:
G036029
Division:
Case Caption:
Mokler v. County of Orange et al.
Case Type:
CV
Filing Date:
09/07/2005
Completion Date:
01/30/2008
Oral Argument Date/Time:
Docket (Register of Actions)
Mokler v. County of Orange et al.
Case Number G036029
| Date | Description | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 09/12/2005 | Notice of appeal lodged/received. | Aplt./ Pamela Mokler |
| 09/21/2005 | Received copy of: | Errata to notice of appeal filed on 09/07/05 by aplt Pamela Mokler.The notice of appeal should read aplt hereby appeals from the ordergranting new trial on or about 08/05/05 (courtesy copy). |
| 09/22/2005 | Civil case information statement filed. | |
| 09/22/2005 | To court. | Civil Case Information Statement and misc folder |
| 09/26/2005 | Received copy of: | Errata to notice of appeal filed on 09/07/05 (filed w/superior crt on09/19/05) |
| 09/26/2005 | Notice per rule 5.1 - with reporter's transcript. | |
| 09/26/2005 | Filed declaration of: | Reporter's transcript on appeal. The parties to this appeal arehereby noticed that the following proceeding cannot be transcribed:02/26/05. |
| 09/27/2005 | Notice of appeal lodged/received. | Cross appeal by County of Orange/Chris Norby.(Respondent to this X-appeal is Pamela M. Mokler) |
| 09/30/2005 | Settlement conference declined. | declined at this time without written notice sent to parties |
| 10/07/2005 | Default letter sent; no case information statement filed. | (for the cross-appeal) |
| 10/11/2005 | Filed declaration of: | re reporter's transcript on appeal (for the x-appeal). The partiesare hereby noticed that the proceedings for the date of 02/21/05,cannot be prepared, as it was a court holiday. |
| 10/11/2005 | Received copy of: | Notice to prepare reporter's transcript and clerk's transcript onappeal (for cross-appeal). |
| 10/13/2005 | Civil case information statement filed. | by cross-aplts County of Orange & Chris Norby |
| 10/28/2005 | Notice to reporter to prepare transcript. | W. Vallarino, L. Rouly (appeal and x-appeal) |
| 11/08/2005 | Court reporter extension requested. | Court reporter Wendi Vallarino's request for ext of time to preparetranscript to 12/28/05. |
| 11/09/2005 | Court reporter extension granted. | Reporter: Vallarino, Wendi (009337).Deadline extended to: 12/28/05. |
| 12/06/2005 | Association of attorneys filed for: | Lynberg & Watkins, counsel of record for resps/x-aplts associates thefirm of Horvitz & Levy, LLP, as co-counsel. |
| 12/08/2005 | Proposed briefing sequence filed by: | stipulation by parties |
| 12/08/2005 | To court. | Stipulation re proposed briefing sequence |
| 12/14/2005 | Briefing sequence order filed. | Aob for defts & aplts due 30days after record is filed. Combined Rb& xaob due 30days thereafter. Combined Arb + xrb due 30 days there-after. X-arb due 20days thereafter. |
| 12/23/2005 | Court reporter extension requested. | Court reporter Wendi Vallarino's request for ext of time to preparetranscript to 01/17/06. |
| 12/30/2005 | Note: | Sent docket re status check of court reporter's request for extensionof time received on 12/23/05. |
| 12/30/2005 | Court reporter extension denied. | Reporter Wendi Vallarino's request for extension DENIED. |
| 01/05/2006 | Reporter's transcript filed. | 21 RT |
| 01/13/2006 | Requested - extension of time | Appellant's appendix and opening brief filed. Requested for By 58 Day(s) Attorney: Watkins, Norman (by stp) (requesting rb/x-aob extension Party: Norby, Chris of 90 days) |
| 01/18/2006 | Stipulation of extension of time filed to: | Appellant's appendix and opening brief filed. Due on 04/05/2006 By 58 Day(s) Attorney: Watkins, Norman (aao extended to 04/05/06; rb/x-aob due Party: Norby, Chris 90 days thereafter) |
| 03/22/2006 | Requested - extension of time | Appellant's appendix and opening brief filed. Requested for By 30 Day(s) Attorney: Watkins, Norman Party: Norby, ChrisAttorney: Watkins, Norman Party: County of OrangeAttorney: Card, Howard Party: Mokler, Pamela |
| 03/23/2006 | Granted - extension of time. | Appellant's appendix and opening brief filed. Due on 05/05/2006 By 30 Day(s) Attorney: Watkins, Norman 2nd ext. for aao to 05/05/06 Party: Norby, ChrisAttorney: Watkins, Norman Party: County of OrangeAttorney: Card, Howard Party: Mokler, Pamela |
| 05/08/2006 | Appellant notified pursuant to rule 17(a)(1). | |
| 05/23/2006 | Appellant's appendix and opening brief filed. | Attorney: Watkins, Norman (rb/xaob due 90 days thereafter per stp) Party: Norby, Chris **see 12/14/05 briefing schedule for further briefing** (see tab i)8 vols appendix |
| 08/21/2006 | Requested - extension of time | Respondent's brief. Requested for By 31 Day(s) Attorney: Card, Howard Party: Mokler, Pamela |
| 08/21/2006 | Granted - extension of time. | Respondent's brief. Due on 09/21/2006 By 31 Day(s) Attorney: Card, Howard 1st ext - rb/x-aob ext'd to 9/21/06 Party: Mokler, Pamela |
| 09/25/2006 | Requested - extension of time | Respondent's brief. Requested for By 29 Day(s) Attorney: Card, Howard **29 day ext requested Party: Mokler, Pamela |
| 09/26/2006 | Granted - extension of time. | Respondent's brief. Due on 10/20/2006 By 29 Day(s) Attorney: Card, Howard **ext granted to 10/20/06 Party: Mokler, Pamela |
| 10/20/2006 | Order filed. | The court believes that the use of an electronic record and electronicbriefs may be appropriate and beneficial to the parties and the courtin this matter. Therefore, the parties are invited to confer andadvise the court within 45 days of the date of this order as towhether they are willing to participate in the court's e-briefingprogram. The court's rules of procedure for e-briefing are at: http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/courtsofappeal/4thDistrictDiv3/efiling.htm. |
| 10/20/2006 | Requested - extension of time | Respondent's brief. Requested for By 30 Day(s) Attorney: Card, Howard 31 day ext requested. Party: Mokler, Pamela |
| 10/23/2006 | Granted - extension of time. | Respondent's brief. Due on 11/20/2006 By 0 Day Attorney: Card, Howard **ext'd to 11/20/06 Party: Mokler, Pamela |
| 11/22/2006 | Respondent notified pursuant to rule 17(a)(2). | As to combined X-resp's brief & aplt's opening brief |
| 12/05/2006 | Filed letter from: | Law firm of Horvitz & Levy counsel for the County of Orange and ChrisNorby,(respondents and cross appellants) re the matter of electronicbriefing, parties are still determiming whether this can besubmitted via electronic briefing. |
| 12/07/2006 | Respondent's brief. | Attorney: Card, Howard (rb/x-aao) Party: Mokler, PamelaAttorney: Card, Howard Party: Mokler, Pamela |
| 12/07/2006 | Association of attorneys filed for: | Aplt atty H. Bryan Card associates Robert H. Pourvali of the LawOffices of Robert H. Pourvali as co-counsel. |
| 12/18/2006 | Requested - extension of time | Attorney: Watkins, Norman (by stipulation) Party: County of Orange |
| 12/19/2006 | To court. | 12/5/06 letter from counsel re the electronic briefing. |
| 12/19/2006 | Stipulation of extension of time filed to: | Attorney: Watkins, Norman * Ext'd to 2/26/07 Party: County of Orange |
| 12/28/2006 | Filed letter from: | from law firm of Horvitz & Levy for County of Orange and Chris Norby.re the matter of electronic briefing. |
| 02/21/2007 | Requested - extension of time | Attorney: Watkins, Norman Party: County of Orange |
| 02/21/2007 | Granted - extension of time. | Attorney: Watkins, Norman * Ext'd to 3/28/07 Party: County of Orange |
| 04/12/2007 | Respondent notified pursuant to rule 8.220(a)(2). | Defendant-respondent-x/appellant: County of Orange Defendant-respondent-x/appellant: Chris Norby County of Orange and Chris Norby for cross-rb/arb |
| 04/18/2007 | Appellant's reply brief. | Defendant-respondent-x/appellant: County of Orange Defendant-respondent-x/appellant: Chris Norby appellants' reply brief and cross-respondents' brief filed by County of Orange and Chris Norby. |
| 04/18/2007 | Case fully briefed. | |
| 04/18/2007 | Argument letter sent. | |
| 04/30/2007 | Request for oral argument filed by: | Atty Stuart B. Esner counsel for aplt Pamela M. Mokler. Time estimate - 15 min. |
| 05/02/2007 | Request for oral argument filed by: | Atty Kim L. Nguyen counsel for deft and aplts County of Orange et al. |
| 05/08/2007 | Stipulation of extension of time filed to: | Appellant's reply brief. Due on 06/06/2007 By 30 Day(s) Parties stip to extend X-Arb - Granted to 6/9/07. |
| 06/06/2007 | Appellant's reply brief. | Plaintiff-appellant-x/respond: Pamela Mokler Attorney: Howard Bryan Card as to the cross-appeal (x-aplt Mokler). |
| 06/06/2007 | Case fully briefed. | |
| 06/06/2007 | Argument letter sent. | |
| 06/14/2007 | Request for oral argument filed by: | Atty. Kim L. Nguyen for cross-appellants and respondents County of Orange and Chris Norby. Time estimate 20 minutes |
| 06/15/2007 | Request for oral argument filed by: | Stuart Esner attorney for respondent Pamela Mokler. Time estimate 20 minutes. |
| 06/18/2007 | Case briefed and on assignment panel. | August 2007 calendar |
| 06/21/2007 | Filed document entitled: | Letter w/5 CD's containing the electronic record and briefs by resps/x-aplts County of Orange et al. |
| 07/06/2007 | Calendar notice sent. Calendar date: | 8-27-07 at 9:00 a.m. |
| 08/20/2007 | Filed additional cites for oral argument. | By aplt Pamela Mokler |
| 08/27/2007 | Cause argued and submitted. | Atty Stuart Esner argued for aplt and x-resp. Atty Frederic D. Cohen argued for resp and x-aplt. |
| 08/29/2007 | Received document entitled: | letter from resp/x-aplts County of Orange and Chris Norby re:addt'l information requested at o/a |
| 08/29/2007 | Received document entitled: | letter from aplt/x-resp Pamela Mokler re:addt'l information requested at o/a |
| 11/26/2007 | Opinion filed. | (Signed Published) Orders reversed in part and affirmed in part/Aronson/O'Leary/Ikola |
| 01/30/2008 | Remittitur issued. | |
| 01/30/2008 | Case complete. | |
| 01/07/2009 | Record shipped to records center | list # 81 loc # 496401391 loc # 496401392 loc # 496401393 |
| 08/08/2013 | Filed letter from: | Christian Teeter requesting that the opinion in this case be removed from the court's website. Sent a letter to him telling him the matter is of public record and cannot be removed. A copy of both letters placed in file. |
| 09/05/2013 | Filed letter from: | Christian Teeter in reply to my letter re the opinion posted on our website. |
| 04/01/2020 | Record destroyed pursuant to rule 10.1028 | Published case- Sent to State Archives |
Briefs
Mokler v. County of Orange et al.
Case Number G036029
| Brief | Due Date | Date Filed | Party and Attorney | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appellant's appendix and opening brief filed. | 05/23/2006 | Attorney: Watkins, Norman (rb/xaob due 90 days thereafter per stp) Party: Norby, Chris **see 12/14/05 briefing schedule for further briefing** (see tab i) 8 vols appendix | ||
| Respondent's brief. | 12/07/2006 | Attorney: Card, Howard (rb/x-aao) Party: Mokler, Pamela Attorney: Card, Howard Party: Mokler, Pamela | ||
| Appellant's reply brief. | 04/18/2007 | Defendant-respondent-x/appellant: County of Orange Defendant-respondent-x/appellant: Chris Norby | appellants' reply brief and cross-respondents' brief filed by County of Orange and Chris Norby. | |
| Appellant's reply brief. | 06/06/2007 | Plaintiff-appellant-x/respond: Pamela Mokler Attorney: Howard Bryan Card | as to the cross-appeal (x-aplt Mokler). |
Future Scheduled Actions
Mokler v. County of Orange et al.
Case Number G036029
No information found.
Disposition
Mokler v. County of Orange et al.
Case Number G036029
Description:
Affirmed in part and reversed in part
Date:
11/26/2007
Disposition Type:
Final
Orders reversed in part and affirmed in part/Aronson/O'Leary/Ikola
Orders reversed in part and affirmed in part/Aronson/O'Leary/Ikola
Publication Status:
Signed Published
Author:
Aronson, Richard M.
Participants:
Ikola, Raymond J. (Concur)
O'Leary, Kathleen E. (Concur)
O'Leary, Kathleen E. (Concur)
Case Citation:
157 Cal App 4th 121
Trial Court
Mokler v. County of Orange et al.
Case Number G036029
Trial Court Name:
Orange County Superior Court - Central
County:
Orange
Trial Court Case Number:
04CC02423
Trial Court Judge:
Hayes, W.
Trial Court Judgment Date:
08/05/2005