| Case Information: 36830 | |||
| Short Caption: | KUKES VS. DISTRICT COURT | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Related Case(s): | 35238 , 35972 | ||
| Lower Court Case(s): | Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - A365422 | Classification: | Original Proceeding - Civil - Mandamus/Prohibition |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Notice in Lieu of Remittitur Issued/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | How Submitted: | ||
| Party Information | ||
| Role | Party Name | Represented By |
| Petitioner | Kelly Kukes | Albert D. Massi (Albert D. Massi, Ltd.) |
| Petitioner | Robert Kukes | Albert D. Massi (Albert D. Massi, Ltd.) |
| Real Party in Interest | Arc Materials Corporation | Daniel F. Polsenberg (Beckley Singleton Jemison Cobeaga & List/Las Vegas) |
| Real Party in Interest | CSR America, Inc. | Daniel F. Polsenberg (Beckley Singleton Jemison Cobeaga & List/Las Vegas) |
| Real Party in Interest | WMK Builders Products | Daniel F. Polsenberg (Beckley Singleton Jemison Cobeaga & List/Las Vegas) |
| Respondent | The Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada, in and for the County of Clark | |
| Respondent | The Honorable Gene T. Porter, District Judge | |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 10/03/2000 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Albert D. Massi Ltd.--check no. 27204. | ||
| 10/03/2000 | Petition/Writ | Filed Petition for Writ of Mandamus or Prohibition. | 00-17462 | |
| 10/03/2000 | Petition/Writ | Filed Exhibits to Petition for Writ. | 00-17463 | |
| 11/06/2000 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice of Procedural Deficiency. Proof of service on district judge. Due Date: 10 days | ||
| 11/13/2000 | Notice/Incoming | Filed Proof of Service. (Gene T. Porter). | 00-19823 | |
| 12/04/2000 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order Denying Petition. " . . . we deny the petition." fn1[This is the second petition for extraordinary relief filed by petitioners, in a six-month period, arising out of the same district court proceeding. We admonish counsel for petitioners that duplicative filings waste this court's limited time and resources. We will consider the imposition of monetary sanctions should petitioners file any additional petition, related to the same underlying district court case and issue, that does not present a meritorious argument for extraordinary relief.] NNP00A-MS/DA/ML | 00-21118 | |
| 01/03/2001 | Remittitur | Issued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur. | 00-21233 | |
| 01/03/2001 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||