| Case Information: 36844 | |||
| Short Caption: | VEACH VS. LEAVITT | Court: | Supreme Court |
| Lower Court Case(s): | Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - D209329 | Classification: | Civil Appeal - Family Law - Proper Person |
| Disqualifications: | Case Status: | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed | |
| Replacement: | Panel Assigned: | Panel | |
| To SP/Judge: | SP Status: | ||
| Oral Argument: | Oral Argument Location: | ||
| Submission Date: | 12/14/2000 | How Submitted: | On Record |
| + Party Information |
| Docket Entries | ||||
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 10/06/2000 | Filing Fee | Filing Fee due. | ||
| 10/06/2000 | Notice of Appeal Documents | Filed Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Proper Person. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. | 00-17726 | |
| 10/06/2000 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Notice to Pay Supreme Court Filing Fee. Due Date: 10 days | ||
| 11/07/2000 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order/Transmit Record and Directing Response. Record due: 30 days. fn1--[The record shall not include any exhibits filed in the district court.] | 00-19579 | |
| 12/14/2000 | Record on Appeal Documents | Filed Record on Appeal. Volumes 1 and 2. | 00-21924 | |
| 12/14/2000 | Case Status Update | Submitted for Decision. | ||
| 01/22/2001 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. Order Denying Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and Motion for Stay, and Denying Request for Sanctions. fn1[Although appellant has neither requested nor been granted leave to file papers in proper person, we direct the clerk of this court to file appellant's motion, received on December 11, 2000, and respondent's opposition, received on December 18, 2000.] NRAP 24 (a) provides that an application to proceed in forma pauperis must be filed in the district court in the first instance. Appellant properly filed his application in district court. We deny appellant's request that we rule on his application at this time. Appellant shall have 20 days from the date of this order to give the district the information it requested. The district court shall have 30 days from the date appellant submits this information to enter an order granting or denying appellant's application, and shall submit a copy of the order to this court. We deny appellant's request for a stay. Respondent has requested an award of attorney's fees. We conclude that while we have denined appellant's motion, sanctions are not warranted. We therefore deny respondent's motion. | 01-01314 | |
| 01/22/2001 | Motion | Filed Proper Person Motion. Motion for Relief Pursuant to N.R.A.P. 27(a) for the Supreme Court of Nevada to Grant Forma Pauperis and Appellant's Current Request for a Stay Pursuant to N.R.A.P. 8, rather than the District Court Due Extreme Convulutions and Involvements by a Law Clerk. | 00-21661 | |
| 01/22/2001 | Motion | Filed Response to Motion. Respondent Opposition to Appellant's Motion for Relief Pursuant to N.R.A.P. 27(a) for the Supreme Court of Nevada to Grant Forma Pauperis and Appellant's Current Request for a Stay Pursuant to N.R.A.P. 8, Rather thatn the District Court due Extreme Convolutions and Involvements by a Law Clerk. | 00-22060 | |
| 03/12/2001 | Order/Incoming | Filed District Court Order. Copy of order filed in district court on March 8, 2001, and Notice of Entry filed March 9, 2001, submitted by Judge Moss, denying appellant's request to proceed in forma pauperis. | 01-04391 | |
| 03/04/2003 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Denying Motion. Denying Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. On January 22, 2001, we direct appellant to provide the district court with information it requested to rule on appellant's application to proceed in forma pauperis. On January 23, 2001, before the district court resolved appellant's application to proceed in forma pauperis, appellant submitted in this court a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. fn1[Although appellant was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, see NRAP 46(b), we have considered the proper person documents received from him.] Appellant's motion is improper. Moreover, the documents submitted by appellant to this court fail to demonstrate that in forma pauperis status is warranted. Appellant shall pay the filing fee required by NRS 2.250(1)(a) within ten days of this order's date. Failure to pay the fee may result in the dismissal of this appeal. | 03-03529 | |
| 04/22/2003 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order Dismissing Appeal. Appellant has failed to respond in any way to this court's directive to pay the filing fee. Consequently, we conclude that appellant has abandoned this appeal, and we "ORDER this appeal DISMISSED." NNP03-RR/WM/MG | 03-06834 | |
| 05/20/2003 | Remittitur | Issued Remittitur. Returned Record on Appeal, Vols. 1 and 2 this day. | 03-07604 | |
| 05/20/2003 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | ||
| 06/05/2003 | Remittitur | Filed Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on May 22, 2003. | 03-07604 | |