judyrecords
search tips
760 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

CO. OF WASHOE VS. TRUCKEE MEADOWS REG'L PLANNING AGENCY

Case Information: 38749
Short Caption:CO. OF WASHOE VS. TRUCKEE MEADOWS REG'L PLANNING AGENCYCourt:Supreme Court
Related Case(s): 38317
Lower Court Case(s):Washoe Co. - Second Judicial District - CV0103867Classification:Civil Appeal - General - Other
Disqualifications:Case Status:Disposition Filed/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: En Banc
To SP/Judge:11/15/2001 / Worrell, CarolynSP Status:Completed
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:How Submitted:

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
11/07/2001Filing Fee Filing Fee Waived.
11/07/2001Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal/Settlement. Notice re: settlement conference program/suspension of rules mailed to all counsel. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) 01-18612
11/15/2001Settlement NoticeIssued Notice: Assignment to Settlement Program. Settlement Judge: Carolyn Worrell. (Briefing and preparation of transcripts suspended pending further order of this court.)
11/19/2001Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement. 01-19354
11/27/2001Notice/Outgoing Letter. Carolyn Worrell.
12/04/2001Filing Fee Filing Fee Waived. (Cross-appeal)
12/04/2001Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Cross-Appeal. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for cross-appellant.) 01-20272
12/07/2001Notice/Outgoing Letter. Carolyn Worrell.
12/18/2001Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement. Respondent/Cross-Appellant. (Copy of docketing statement mailed to settlement judge.) 01-21343
01/04/2002MotionFiled Motion. Application for Extension of District Court Stay and Order for Expedited Briefing Schedule. 02-00296
01/11/2002MotionFiled Response to Motion. Response in Opposition to Appellant's Application for Extension of District Court Stay. 02-00845
01/14/2002Settlement Program ReportFiled Interim Settlement Program Report. The settlement judge recommends that this case be removed from the settlement conference program. 02-00902
01/14/2002Notice/IncomingFiled Notice. Statement of Non-Position on Appellant's Application for Extension of District Court Stay. 02-00944
01/16/2002Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion. Order Granting Motion for a Stay and for Expedited Briefing. We grant appellant's motion and we extend the district court's stay in District Court Case Number CV0103867 for the duration of this appeal. We also conclude that an expedited briefing schedule is warranted. To the extent this court's docket permits, we will also expedite oral argument if, upon further review of this case, we determine that oral argument is necessary. Pursuant to the written recommendation of the settlement judge, we remove this case from the settlement conference program. Appellant: 10 days from the date of this order to file a transcript request form or a certificate of no transcript request under NRAP 9; 70 days from the date of this order to file the opening brief and appendix. Briefing shall then proceed in accordance with NRAP 31(a)(1) and NRAP 28(h). No extensions of time will be granted absent extreme and unforeseeable circumstances. 02-01124
01/25/2002MotionFiled Stipulation. Stipulation to extend time to respond to any filings during January 22, 2002 through February 15, 2002. 02-01770
01/28/2002Transcript RequestFiled Certificate of No Transcript Request. 02-01881
02/20/2002Order/Clerk'sFiled Clerk's Order. On January 25, 2002, the parties filed a stipulation pursuant to which respondent/cross-respondent City of Reno "shall have a period of time after February 15, 2002, to respond to any filings that occur during the period of January 22, 2002 through February 15, 2002, which is equal to the period the City would have had under the briefing schedule established by this Court." A review of the court's docket indicates that there is currently no document due from the City of Reno in response to any document filed between January 22, 2002, and February 15, 2002. Accordingly, the stipulation is denied as moot. 02-03201
03/27/2002BriefFiled Opening Brief. Appellant/Cross-Respondent. Mailed on: 03/26/02. Signed by: Madelyn Shipman. 02-05407
03/27/2002AppendixFiled Appendix to Opening Brief. Appellant/Cross-Respondent. 02-05408
04/25/2002BriefFiled Answering Brief. Respondent City of Reno's Answering Brief. Mailed on: Hand delivered 04/25/02. Signed by: Marilyn D. Craig. 02-07351
04/25/2002AppendixFiled Appendix to Answering Brief. Respondents City of Reno and Property Owners' Joint Appendix. Vols. 1 and 2. 02-07355
04/25/2002BriefFiled Answering Brief. Respondent Property Owners' Answering Brief and Respondent Boomtown. Mailed on: Hand delivered 04/25/02. Signed by: R. Shawn Oliphant and Stephen C. Mollath. 02-07359
04/29/2002BriefFiled Answering Brief. Respondent/Cross-Appellant Truckee Meadows Regional Planning Agency. Mailed on: Hand delivered 04/29/02. Signed by: Norman J. Azevedo. 02-07560
05/28/2002BriefFiled Reply Brief. Appellant Washoe County's Reply Brief to City of Reno and Property Owners' Answering Brief. Mailed on: 05/24/02. 02-09294
05/28/2002BriefFiled Answering Brief. Appellant Washoe County's Answering Brief to Cross-Appellant's Opening Brief. Mailed on: 05/24/02. 02-09295
05/28/2002MotionFiled Motion. City of Reno'sand Property Owners' Joint Motion to Permit the City and the Property Owners to File a Joint Reply Brief to Cross-Appellant's Brief. 02-09301
06/07/2002MotionFiled Response to Motion. Opposition to the City of Reno'sand Property Owners' Joint Motion to Permit the City and the Property Owners to File a Joint Reply Brief to Cross-Appellant's Brief. 02-09998
06/17/2002Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion. On May 28, 2002, cross-respondents City and Property Owners filed a motion requesting leave to file a 'joint reply brief to cross-appellant's brief.' fn1[We note that this request to file a 'joint reply brief' is a typographical error. Pursuant to NRAP 28, a cross-respondent is only permitted to file an answering brief.] Cross-appellant RPA opposes the motion. Cause appearing, we grant the motion. Because we grant the motion, we direct the clerk of this court to separate the brief attached to the motion and to file the brief. We remind counsel that documents submitted provisionally should be submitted individually under separate cover, and not attached to a motion. We further direct the clerk to correct the title of the brief to reflect 'CITY OF RENO'S AND PROPERTY OWNERS' JOINT ANSWERING BRIEF ON CROSS-APPEAL TO THE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY'S OPENING BRIEF ON CROSS-APPEAL.' Cross-appellant RPA shall have 30 days from the date of this order to file a reply brief on cross-appeal, if deemed necessary, to cross-respondents City and Property Owners' joint answering brief on cross-appeal. NRAP 31(a)(1) and NRAP 28(c). 02-10440
06/17/2002BriefFiled Answering Brief. City of Reno's and Property Owners' Joint Answering Brief on Cross-Appeal to the Regional Planning Agency's Opening Brief on Cross-Appeal. 02-10441
07/17/2002BriefFiled Reply Brief. Cross-Appellant's (Cross-Respondent's) Reply to City of Reno's and Property Owners' Joint Answering Brief on Cross-Appeal to the Regional Planning Agency's Opening Brief on Cross-Appeal. Mailed on: Hand delivered 07/17/02. 02-12270
07/25/2002Notice/IncomingFiled Notice of Change of Address. Civil Division of Washoe County District Attorney's Office. (P.O. box remains the same.) 02-12781
08/28/2002Case Status Update Briefing Completed. No reply brief on cross-appeal filed.
10/17/2002MotionFiled Stipulation. Lift Stay. 02-18091
10/17/2002Order/IncomingFiled District Court Order. Certified copy of order filed in district court on October 15, 2002. 02-18092
11/15/2002MotionFiled Stipulation/Dismiss Appeal. 02-19713
12/13/2002Order/ProceduralFiled Order/Stipulation Approved. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties filed November 15, 2002, we approve the stipulation and " . . . dismiss the appeal of appellant County of Washoe." We vacate our order entered January 16, 2002, staying all proceedings in Second Judicial District Court Case No. CV0103867. fn1[We disapprove, as moot, the stipulation filed October 17, 2002, which provides that the supreme court may enter an order lifting stay.] Cross-appellant Regional Planning Agency shall, within 10 days from the date of this order, inform this court in writing whether it wishes to pursue its cross-appeal. In the event Regional Planning Agency does not desire to pursue its cross-appeal, it shall, within this same time period, file a stipulation to dismiss its cross-appeal or a motion for voluntary dismissal of its cross-appeal. 02-22247
12/26/2002Other Other. Filed Request for Dismissal of Cross-Appeal. 02-22059
01/03/2003Notice/IncomingFiled Proof of Service. (Request for Dismissal of Cross-Appeal). 03-00161
04/14/2003Order/DispositionalFiled Voluntary Dismissal. Dismissing Cross-Appeal. On December 13, 2002, this court entered an order directing cross-appellant Regional Planning Agency to inform this court in writing whether it wishes to pursue its cross-appeal. Regional Planning Agency has filed a motion for dismissal of its cross-appeal. Cause appearing, we grant the motion. "The cross-appeal of Regional Planning Agency is dismissed." EN BANC 03-06253
04/14/2003Case Status Update Case Closed. No remittitur issued.