| Docket Entries |
| Date | Type | Description | Pending? | Document |
| 09/19/2000 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Elayne E. Terryberry--check no. 790. | | |
| 09/19/2000 | Petition/Writ | Filed Proper Person Petition for Writ. Motion for Leave of Court to File Application for Writ of Mandamus and numerous other motions (attached). | | 00-16546
|
| 01/10/2001 | Other | Other. Receipt of courtesy copy of Motion for Leave of Court to Revive a Dormant Judgment from Lapse of Time filed in district court. | | |
| 01/24/2001 | Other Incoming Document | Received Proper Person Document. Received from petitioner Elaine Terryberry numerous documents sent to Judge, Thomas A. Ritchie, Jr. and James S. Kent counsel for Calvin Fedders. | | |
| 01/26/2001 | Other Incoming Document | Received Proper Person Document. Received from petitioner Elaine Terryberry numerous documents sent to Judge, Thomas A. Ritchie, Jr. and James S. Kent counsel for Calvin Fedders. | | |
| 03/08/2001 | Other Incoming Document | Received Proper Person Document. Received from petitioner Elaine Terryberry numerous documents sent to Judge, Thomas A. Ritchie, Jr. and James S. Kent, counsel for Calvin Fedders. | | |
| 04/03/2001 | Other Incoming Document | Received Proper Person Document. Received from petitioner Elaine Terryberry a Motion for Leave of Court for Notification of Change of Address and Telephone Number sent to Judge Thomas A. Ritchie, Jr., James S. Kent and Supreme Court Clerk. | | |
| 04/09/2001 | Other Incoming Document | Received Proper Person Document. Received from petitioner Elaine Terryberry a Notification of Change of Address and Telephone Number sent to James S. Kent, Judge Thomas A. Ritchie, Jr., and Supreme Court Clerk. | | |
| 08/08/2001 | Order/Dispositional | Filed Order Denying Petition. Denying Petition for Writ of Mandamus. " . . . denying petition for writ of mandamus." fn2[Although petitioner was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, we have considered the proper person documents received from petitioner. We conclude that the relief requested is not warranted.] SNP01A-CY/ML/NB | | 01-13355
|
| 09/05/2001 | Remittitur | Issued Notice in Lieu of Remittitur. | | 01-13448
|
| 09/05/2001 | Case Status Update | Remittitur Issued/Case Closed. | | |
| 09/25/2001 | Other | Returned Unfiled Document. Returned, with letter, Addendum Exhibits for Evidence against Respondent, Granting Leave of Court to Issue Exhibits under Dormant Judgment by Mandamus | | |
| 10/10/2001 | Other | Returned Unfiled Document. Returned with letter, Receipt of Document w/numerous documents attached. | | |
| 11/14/2002 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Denying Motion. Denying Motion to Recall Notice in Lieu of Remittitur. "We deny petitioner's motion to recall the (notice in lieu of ) remittitur and for leave to file an untimely petition for rehearing." fn4[Although petitioner was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, see NRAP 46(b), we have considered the proper person documents received from her. We note that petitioner contends that there is a "conflict of interest" by Justice Becker's participation in the proceedings, since Justice Becker signed the amended divorce decree in 1994. We conclude that petitioner has failed to meet her burden of establishing sufficient factual grounds that would warrant Justice Becker's disqualification.] | | 02-19594
|
| 10/23/2003 | Notice/Outgoing | Issued Letter. to Elaine Terryberry, returning check no. 1420 in the amount of $100 which she submitted as a rehearing fee. No rehearing is pending in this case and no fee is due. | | |
| 11/07/2003 | Filing Fee | Received Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $150 from Elaine Terryberry-Money Order No. 06327046664. | | |
| 04/27/2004 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order. On August 8, 2001, this court entered an order denying petitioner's proper person petition for a writ of mandamus. Petitioner did not file a petition for rehearing, and on September 5, 2001, the clerk of this court issued a notice in lieu of remittitur. On November 6, 2001, this court received a proper person motion to recall the notice in lieu of remittitur and a rehearing. The motion was denied on November 14, 2002. On December 5, 2002, this court received a renewed proper person motion to recall notice in lieu of remittitur. Petitioner's request for relief is untimely. Therefore, this court denies the relief requested. fn1[Although petitioner was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, see NRAP 46(b), we have considered the proper person documents received from her. On November 7, 2003, petitioner submitted a $150 money order as payment for the proposed December 2002 rehearing petition. In light of this order we direct the clerk of this court to return the filing fee to petitioner.] | | 04-07697
|
| 01/06/2005 | Order/Procedural | Filed Order Denying Motion. On August 8, 2001, we entered an order that denied this proper person petition for a writ of mandamus. Petitioner did not file a petition for rehearing, and on September 5, 2001, the clerk of this court issued a notice in lieu of remittitur. On November 6, 2001, we received petitioner's proper person motion to recall the notice in lieu of remittitur and for rehearing. The motion was denied on November 14, 2002. On December 5, 2002, we received petitioner's renewed proper person motion to recall the notice in lieu of remittitur. On April 27, 2004, that motion was denied. On May 10, 2004, we received a proper person motion to show cause and to reverse the April 27 order. We conclude that petitioner has failed to demonstrate that relief is warranted. fn2[Although petitioner was not granted leave to file papers in proper person, see NRP 46(b), we have considered the proper person documents received from her.] Accordingly, we deny her motion. | | 05-00339
|