judyrecords
search tips
740 million+
United States Court Cases

Nevada Supreme/Appellate Court Record

VANNOZZI VS. VANNOZZI C/W 35918

Case Information: 35227
Short Caption:VANNOZZI VS. VANNOZZI C/W 35918Court:Supreme Court
Consolidated:35227*, 35918 Related Case(s): 35918
Lower Court Case(s):Clark Co. - Eighth Judicial District - D202252Classification:Civil Appeal - Family Law - Child Custody
Disqualifications:Case Status:Remittitur Issued/Case Closed
Replacement:Panel Assigned: Panel
To SP/Judge:SP Status:
Oral Argument:Oral Argument Location:
Submission Date:04/23/2001How Submitted:

+ Party Information

Docket Entries
DateTypeDescriptionPending?Document
12/03/1999Filing FeeReceived Filing Fee Paid on Filing. $200.00 from Bruce I. Shapiro Ltd.--check no. 5980.
12/03/1999Notice of Appeal DocumentsFiled Certified Copy of Notice of Appeal. Appeal docketed in the Supreme Court this day. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel for appellant.) 99-12076
01/10/2000MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. Motion for Extension of Time to File Transcript Request Form and Docketing Statement. 00-00356
01/13/2000Order/Clerk'sFiled Clerk's Order. The docketing statement and transcript request form provisionally submitted on January 10, 2000, shall be filed, forthwith. 00-00558
01/13/2000Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement. 00-00357
01/13/2000Transcript RequestFiled Request for Transcript of Proceedings. Transcripts requested: April 26, 1999, 11:00 a.m.; June 2, 1999, 3:00 p.m.; June 30, 1999, 2:00 p.m.; July 1, 1999, 2:00 p.m. To Court Reporter: Deborah Casper. 00-00358
01/24/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order. The appellant's motion for an extension of time to file a transcript request form and docketing statement was granted by a clerk's order dated January 13, 2000. Respondent has not been granted, nor has she formally requested, leave to file documents in proper person with this court. In the interest of justice, we direct the clerk of this court to file the response submitted by respondent in proper person on January 18, 2000. We have considered respondent's response as a motion to reconsider the order granting appellant's motion for an extension of time to file a transcript request form and docketing statement. We deny respondent's motion for reconsideration of that order. 00-01147
01/24/2000MotionFiled Proper Person Response. Response to Motion for Extension of Time to File Transcript Request Form and Docketing Statement. 00-00728
02/10/2000MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. 00-02120
02/14/2000MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. 00-02288
02/16/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order Granting Motion. Court reporter Deborah S. Casper shall have to and including March 5, 2000, to file and serve the transcripts requested in this matter. 00-02479
02/23/2000Order/Clerk'sFiled Clerk's Order. fn1[On February 16, 2000, this court granted the court reporter until March 5, 2000, to file the transcripts.] The opening brief and appendix shall be served and filed on or before May 4, 2000. 00-02836
03/06/2000TranscriptFiled Transcript. Proceedings: 04/26/99; 06/02/99; 06/30/99; and 07/01/99. Court Reporter: Deborah S. Casper. 00-03480
04/25/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order. Attorney Fred Kennedy shall have 20 days from the date of this order within which to inform this court whether he also represents respondent in docket no. 35227. We suspend the briefing schedule in both appeals, the time for filing a request for transcript in docket no. 35918, and the time for filing the docketing statement in docket no. 35918, pending attorney Kennedy's response to this order (nos. 35227/35918). 00-06715
05/10/2000MotionFiled Motion to Consolidate. Nos. 35227 & 35918 00-07746
05/11/2000MotionFiled Response to Order to Show Cause. Fred W. Kennedy, Esq., is not representing respondent for any Supreme Court matters. Nos. 35227, 35918. 00-07822
06/21/2000Order/ProceduralFiled Order. We grant appellant's motion to consolidate these appeals, and we hereby consolidate the above-entitled matters for all appellate purposes. On April 25, 2000, we entered an order directing respondent's counsel of record in Docket No. 35918, Fred W. Kennedy, to inform this court whether he also represnets respondent in Docket No. 35227. On May 11, 2000, Kennedy filed a response to our order, indicating that he does not represent respondent in either matter. It therefore appears that respondent intends to proceed without counsel in these appeals. Due from appellant in Docket No. 35918: 15 days to comply with NRAP 9(a) and to file the docketing statement. Upon the filing of the docketing statement, this court shall conduct a preliminary jurisdictional review of these appeals. Appellant: 120 days from the date of this order to file a single opening brief and appendix, addressing the issues raised in both appeals. Thereafter, these consolidated appeals shall stand submitted for decision on the opening brief and appendix. (Docketing statement mailed to counsel in Docket No. 35918). Nos. 35277, 35918. 00-10641
06/30/2000Docketing StatementFiled Docketing Statement. Filed in 35918. (Nos. 35227 and 35918.)
07/18/2000Transcript RequestFiled Request for Transcript of Proceedings. Transcripts requested: 1/24/00. To Court Reporter: Deborah Casper. Nos. 35227/35918. 00-12415
08/07/2000TranscriptFiled Transcript. Proceedings: January 24, 2000. Court Reporter: Deborah Casper (case nos. 35227/35918). 00-13641
10/02/2000Notice/IncomingFiled Notice of Change of Address. (Bruce I. Shapiro, Esq.) (Nos. 35227 and 35918). 00-17331
10/19/2000MotionFiled Motion to Extend Time. Motion for Permission to File Opening Brief in Excess of Thirty Pages and to Extend Time to File Opening Brief. Nos. 35227/35918. 00-18587
10/30/2000MotionFiled Stipulation. Nos. 35227/35918. 00-19121
04/04/2001Order/ProceduralFiled Order. On June 21, 2000, this court entered an order granting appellant's motion to consolidate these appeals. On October 19, 2000, appellant filed a motion for leave to file a brief in excess of thirty pages and for a thirty day extension of time to file and serve the opening brief. On October 30, 2000, the parties filed a stipulation to extend the filing date of the opening brief appendix by the same time period and requested permission to file a brief of up to fifty pages. Appellant may file an opening brief of up to fifty pages. The time requested for an extension having passed, we deny the motion and disapprove the parties' stipulation as moot. In the interest of judicial economy we direct appellant to file and serve the opening brief and appendix within 15 days from the date of this order. We do not expect any further delay in the briefing of this appeal. Failure to timely file an opening brief and appendix or to fully comply with orders of this court may result in the imposition of sanctions including the dismissal of these appeals as abandoned. Nos. 35227/35918. (01-05765) 01-05765
04/23/2001BriefFiled Opening Brief. Mailed on: 04/19/01. Nos. 35227/35918. 01-06844
04/23/2001AppendixFiled Appendix to Opening Brief. Vols. 1 through 6. Nos. 35227/35918. 01-06845
04/23/2001Case Status Update Submitted for Decision. Submitted on the Opening Brief and Appendix. Nos. 35227/35918.
12/05/2001Order/DispositionalFiled Order of Affirmance. These are consolidated appeals. Having considered all of appellant's contentions and concluded that they lack merit, we "ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED." SNP02-CY/DA/ML. Nos. 35227/35918. 01-20308
01/02/2002RemittiturIssued Remittitur. 01-20402
01/02/2002Case Status Update Remittitur Issued/Case Closed.
01/18/2002RemittiturFiled Remittitur. Received by County Clerk on January 7, 2002. 01-20402